(10-20-2021 02:00 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(10-20-2021 01:16 PM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  

(10-20-2021 12:59 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(10-20-2021 12:54 PM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  Sorry that you are so offended by that. I felt OO's response was rather condescending in places and felt it deserved the same in response. Notice the ones I bolded?

But not sorry you said it. That is telling.
This whole conversation has degenerated into minutia and ad hominems. I really don't read every comment fully because of that, but some things just stick out.

No, not really. It was incredibly tongue in cheek, and not meant to be serious, at all.

Do you or do you not agree that, black letters on white paper, it was pompous, arrogant, and condescending?

As I said "I felt OO's response was rather condescending in places and felt it deserved the same in response."

I know what I wrote and how it would come across - it was a comment made with tongue in cheek and meant to come across the way you art interpreting it. It wasn't some sincere and earnest comment. I thought OO was being condescending with his obviously insincere questions about "Sonic season."