(07-14-2021 10:48 PM)OptimisticOwl Wrote:  

(07-14-2021 10:42 PM)Rice93 Wrote:  

(07-14-2021 10:35 PM)OptimisticOwl Wrote:  

(07-14-2021 10:25 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(07-14-2021 10:12 PM)Rice93 Wrote:  Ding ding ding! There's a Democratic position that you support! I imagine there are more.

No that's not a democrat position. If it's a democrat position, why was it not passed when democrats had the white house and both houses of congress in 2009-2010, or when democrats took over the white house to go with both houses of congress earlier this year?

It's a libertarian position and I am a libertarian.

I support legalizing it because it makes sense.

But Numbers asks a good question. (Bolded). Will we get an answer?

I imagine that that the powers-that-be felt that it wasn't a great time to push this issue (maybe galvanizing the opposition for the upcoming election?). There's tons of issues that don't make the cut even when one party holds the majority.

I bet if one went through Congress and tallied up the "for" and "against" you would find Democrats >>>> Republicans "for". That's why I would consider it a Democratic position.

If it gathers that much support from both parties, I would consider it a bipartisan position.

Huh? "That much support" from Republicans? How many Republicans have come out strongly for legalization of MJ?