(06-24-2021 02:50 PM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  

(06-24-2021 02:39 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(06-24-2021 02:34 PM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  You did the exact same thing to me - you started the "word twisting" by asking what gun is not deadly against unarmed populations.
It was clear that my point wasn't related to AR-15s being the only gun capable of violence against unarmed populations, and you know that.
I'm impressed you responded this way given your initial response to me.
Please resist the urge to twist my words in future posts. Thank you in advance.

Not quite sure how I twisted anything. Sorry you took offense.

In future I will say whatever the f-k I want to say. Thank you.

Sure can dish it out, but not a fan of having the same thing said right back to ya...

My initial point was clear when I respond to Tanq's post - the joke was shallow and didn't make any sense when you actually thought about it.

Gun control advocates who focus on restricting access to AR-15s are focused not on their use against the military, but unarmed populations. So their position is not connected to their opinion on AR-15s' effectiveness against trained military personnel.

Criminy -- the quote on using weapons on the military came from the egg salad sandwich that *you* probably voted for, dude.

So, in his mind --- at the same time useless against a military, *and* a 'military grade weapon' that should be banned. I mean, not my problem the egg salad thinks both things, and both being contradictory to the other --- and the duality of that precisely matches the Schrodinger duality of matter.

Sorry you dont like it. I guess to you it didnt make sense to you since you might have been unaware of President Egg Salad's comments yesterday. Perhaps now it does,