(06-22-2021 08:57 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(06-22-2021 07:37 AM)Rice93 Wrote:  

(06-22-2021 07:29 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(06-22-2021 05:08 AM)Rice93 Wrote:  

(06-21-2021 11:14 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  Funny, that isnt what I think at all. Please, stop with the 'histrionics.'

It’s becoming clear that you don’t know what “histrionic” means.

Your exaggerated claim two above seems to check all the boxes, My Friend. If wasnt done to attract attention, then it is probably based on sheer and gross error --- if so in that case then I apologize in advance for the mischaracterization. Or, maybe you dont see the somewhat wildly bright and erroneous exaggeration embedded in your first comment.

But, you seemingly chalk another one up for yourself in the smug and condescending category that I denoted earlier with the response directly above, nonetheless.

I think you have missed out on the key part of "histrionics"... the dramatic aspect.

Here's MW:
Definition of histrionics
1: theatrical performances
2: deliberate display of emotion for effect

My post wasn't histrionic. I recall you freaking out over the word "maybe" as being a "weasel word" so perhaps we simply use different dictionaries.

Then your grossly inaccurate attribution of an extreme position wasnt done for dramatic effect, it is mere ignorance. As I noted before, apologies for that mischaracterization.

Seems extreme and stupid enough to be labeled histrionic without the detailed explanation that it wasnt intended to be so, and is instead rooted in simply denoting an extreme and stupid position of enother out of ignorance.

And yes, since you all are the kings of selective definions, you might note that some define histrionic as 'exaggerated amd done to attract attention'. Again, apologies for identifying your pushing a wildly stupid extreme position onto someone else without trying for a dumb*** dramatic effect as having the intent of having that dramatic effect. This should put it to rest I assume, eh?