(06-13-2021 03:17 PM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  At least spread around your holier than thou drivel.

I love how quickly you jump to the opportunity act morally superior when I respond in kind to the same kind of superficial and insultingly shallow **** is said by OO, Tanq, and even Owl#s.

Hell, Owl#s called 93 and me his enemy, but silent you are in that moment. I guess that's high minded commentary that is worthy of the Quad.

Deflection #7000. "he did it first'. This is apparently a 3rd grade playground to you.

Let's start with this.

I chose to respond to your post in the morning and selected it... I didn't finish writing it until later because I'm working... which means although I had selected and begun responding, it didn't 'post' until after those comments were made. After posting, I didn't return to the forum until this morning... so I never saw number's comment until this morning. Your expectations do not create an obligation on my part. I selected this post at about 730am... its now after 9 and I haven't yet hit send. Any posts after 730 but before 9, I will miss unless I come back to the forum. I won't be changing my means of enjoying this forum to appease your sense of what I need to do.

Next, I am under no obligation to read every post on here, including the fact that I don't read all of yours.... and certainly not to respond to them. When I DO read posts from others, I don't draw the same insane conclusions that you do, so I don't often feel compelled to respond... OR I look at what you said, and their response seems very much 'in kind'... and I'm not going to go back and see 'who started it'... You're an adult, I assume.

Third, while I wouldn't have chosen the word 'enemy', its not that far from words I WOULD have chosen. I mean, UTSA et al are our 'enemies' sometimes... Personally I'd say you personally are the useful tool of power hungry politicians more interested in the argument than in the solution. That's you. You seem vastly more interested in 'team' than country, imo. Is that my enemy?? It certainly is in direct conflict with my goals. I don't see 93 or Big in the same terms as I see you. There are certainly some of those from the right as well... LOTS of them on the Spin room forum...

next.....
#'s made a comment about YOU. That's his opinion, perception of you. He is speaking directly about you and what you said. Where is my dog in that fight?? He didn't say 'liberals'. YOU instead said 'conservatives' in response, which by definition in the usage of the English language, INVITES any other conservative into your conversation. I am conservative, so you invited me.... and now once again you cry like a child when I respond to you?? There are PAGES of back and forth between you, Tanq and OO, and I ignored most of it from both of you. I NOTICED when you made a sweeping and obviously ignorant comment about what 'conservatives' believe... and responded to it. It may have happened earlier as well, Tanq may have done it. Maybe I agree with him?? So what? Am I not allowed to have an opinion that disagrees with yours?? More rules from the left that only apply to others.

Said more simply... not that I think you really care to engage in real discussion... you just want to play victim here...
If you say 'conservatives think this' and I don't think it... I feel highly justified and invested in directly refuting a comment that is directed at ME, TELLING me what I think... and you're surprised when I refute your accusation of me?? I feel vastly less invested in refuting comments that aren't telling ME what I think. To any rational person, that makes perfect sense.