(05-24-2021 06:45 AM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  

(05-23-2021 10:32 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(05-23-2021 05:39 PM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  

(05-23-2021 04:47 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(05-23-2021 04:35 PM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  And when did I say something even close to that?

I made it clear that Lightfoot was absolutely wrong when she said “no whites allowed” when it came to keeping white reporters out of the one-on-one interview sessions.

The closest I came was when I said an all black graduation, which would be a supplement to a main graduation ceremony, was OK to me.

You righties don’t want to admit you live in a fairytale world that doesn’t exist, where racism is real and still affects people. You don’t want to admit that your brand of “I don’t see color” is a brand of racism itself.

When pressed into a corner, just yell "RACIST" and "RACISM" at the top of your lil ol lungs. Lolz.

You have preached tirelessly how *you* dont call race neutral issues 'racist'. The above kind of exploded THAT egg all over your face, dont it?

You apparently missed the reason I did that (hint: it was mirroring OO).

See bold.

Lolz.

If you want to charge up the 'not racist equals racist' logic trail, have fun. In that sense, not a very good mirror.

Since the comment went wishing over your head, in response to OO call me a racist, I think I’m fine with ignoring your comment here, too.

Considering your comment came from some dude who is trying to change the phrase and idea 'not dependent on race' to 'dependent on race' that is really gd rich.

Do you understand the real world implications of 'not'? (let alone the philosophical and logical implications). But please, keep flapping those wings, and tap those ruby shoes together three times to erase the word 'not' from the idea of 'not dependent'.

Not surprised you are ignoring me, considering of the more basic concepts you seem to be pretty much ignoring above with your pithy (and rather moronic and continuous) attempt(s) to change 'not dependent' into 'dependent'.