(05-09-2021 10:45 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(05-09-2021 10:19 PM)Rice93 Wrote:  

(05-09-2021 08:54 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(05-09-2021 08:27 PM)Rice93 Wrote:  But to say that she's "the most reprehensible person on earth" in light of people who torture and murder children, people who try to carry out genocide, child traffickers, etc. is just silly.

93, I dont agree with his statement. The issue isnt whether I agree with it, like you seem to want to make it, nor with if anyone in particular agrees with it. But you feel the need to jones it in with an ad hom.

I have a client who thinks his plumber is the most reprehensible person in the world. Feel free to substitute your opinion in that snide way there as well, why dont you.

So, you who squawk to high heaven about others' ad hom issues, feel the deep urge to sling an ad hom based solely on an opinion. Stunningly hypocritical, especially over an opinion.

Any other opinions that will engender your urgent need to toss an ad hom, just so you can preclear that air?

I’m confused by your pushing the idea that all opinions are somehow unassailable.

Where have I said they are 'unassailable'? I think I even noted that I dont agree with that particular one.

In short, not 'unassailable' but definitely not worthy of a snide comment such as you put forth.

The issue as I have framed it is your snide as all hell personal comment on #s. So again, My Friend, "Any other opinions that will engender your urgent need to toss an ad hom, just so you can preclear that air?"

Well, since you asked so nicely more than once... sure... I also have a problem with your opinion that it is reasonable for you to go crazy over my “snide, personal comment” while completely turning a blind eye to #’s snide, personal comments that preceded mine. Thank you. That felt good.