(05-07-2021 08:50 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(05-07-2021 08:43 AM)Rice93 Wrote:  

(05-07-2021 08:34 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(05-07-2021 08:11 AM)Rice93 Wrote:  Also... if the bar for favorable treatment towards women is not having killed one then it is a very low bar indeed.

One which Ted Kennedy, the "lion of the senate," could not pass.

I have not idea where Ted Kennedy factors into this discussion but this is legit the most spectacular whataboutism in the history of the Quad. Congrats, sir. I am in awe!

Let's see, noting that the party that self-describes itself as the champion of women turned a blind eye to the indiscretions of both Ted Kennedy and Bill Clinton because they were on the same team is irrelevant to a discussion of misogyny? Gotcha.

Please enunciate a standard whereby the actions of Donald Trump and/or his staff were/are misogynistic, but the actions of Ted Kennedy and/or Bill Clinton aren't/weren't.

Sure.... the actions of those guys was. I wouldn't dispute that. I've never defened TK or BC. Relevant how?

Does that mean that I should be fine with "Grab 'em by the p****" Don? Well... he didn't kill a woman or have an affair with an intern so I guess he's OK? I don't get it.