(05-04-2021 11:23 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(05-04-2021 10:06 AM)Rice93 Wrote:  

(05-04-2021 09:52 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(05-04-2021 09:31 AM)Rice93 Wrote:  

(05-04-2021 09:21 AM)georgewebb Wrote:  All those capitalized Nouns, for Example, and the sometimes rather liberal, use of Commas. :)

Seems to speak against the, Argument that the FF were so well-educated that their Grammar, was infallible.

I didnt say 'infallible' --- but as a general matter of course amazingly precise and on point.

The FF seemed to employ weird grammatical stuff which points to the possibility that a strict interpretation of the grammar in the 2nd Amendment is tricky.

Basically all of the reading that I've done on this topic suggests that experts have labored over the true intentions of the authors of the 2nd Amendment somewhat endlessly. It seems a lot less cut-and-dry than you suggest.

I guess the verbs 'keep' and 'bear', and the noun phrase 'the people', and the verb phrase 'shall not be infringed' seems to be "tricky" going for some. cest le vie.

I guess. You seem to be the ONLY one (even the constitutional law experts that I've read) who seem to feel that this is straightforward. Even the Supreme Court justices who have addressed this issue would not seem to agree with this assessment.