(12-24-2020 02:23 AM)Rice93 Wrote:  I didn't defend the content of the cartoon. I said that I didn't find it anti-Semitic. That was what I thought OO was implying based on his posting the link to the video. I don't know why I even respond because, as usual, you will ignore what I said so that you can denigrate what you pretend I said. Par for the course.

So you slam me (preemptively, mind you) for 'ignor[ing] what [you] sa[y in your post above]'.

In the post above you said '[you] thought OO was implying [an anti-Semitic] message', yet one can look at OO's posts following the original where he explicitly points out that that is not the message.

I suggest when you preemptively slam me for ignoring your statement, you first look at whom as ignored whom in the chain, my friend. Your a priori attack on me for 'ignoring your comments' is somewhat rich when there seems to be a certain amount of stuff from OO that you, well, ..... to be diplomatic..... 'skipped over' yourself.

Even an uncivil lout as myself can remember at least a couple of times where OO explicitly stated that the point was not anti-Semitism. Nor has this uncivil lout made that point.

The Nazis *did* use the same, exact message in *their* anti-Semitic campaign; but you all seemingly jumped the shark when the word Nazi was invoked and went into a rote repetition of how OO was saying the message was anti-Semitic even when he explicitly said otherwise. Not my problem that you all jumped that shark, and not my problem that you still apparently misconstrue the original point made by OO. Whatever.

Back to my coffee, and back to hauling hay bales.