(12-06-2020 10:57 AM)OptimisticOwl Wrote:  

(12-06-2020 10:40 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(12-06-2020 09:47 AM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  

(12-05-2020 10:37 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(12-05-2020 05:46 PM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  Seriously?

Yep.

Quote:We didn't argue about whether or not Trump did any of those?

There are allegations but no evidence.

Your opinion on whether there are merits to the allegations has no bearing on whether we argued about that exact point...

But, even so, it is patently false to say that there is no evidence of illegally paying off a porn star, sexism, racism, committing obstruction of justice, or Trump staying at personally owned properties during his presidency. Just otherworldly stuff to argue that there is no evidence of those acts.

The length y’all will go to literally deny actual facts (like Trump spending any tax payer funds at his golf courses) is astounding. I mean, even the porn star payment denial of evidence existing is bonkers!

Quote: FBI documents unsealed on Thursday suggest that Donald Trump was actively involved in engineering a hush-money payment shortly before the 2016 election to a porn actress who said she had a sexual encounter with him, as his personal lawyer Michael Cohen, campaign team and others scrambled to head off a scandal.

It shows Cohen having multiple interactions with Trump and Trump's campaign staff as Cohen was negotiating the payoff with Daniels' lawyer and executives of American Media Inc, publisher of the National Enquirer tabloid newspaper.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/mobile.reut...SKCN1UD18D

You might disagree that this proves anything illegal happened, but it is clearly evidence.

And that is the thing, regardless of where you stand on what the evidence means, my comment is still relevant. Because I commented about this exact type of back and forth - one where I claim there is evidence of an action, and where y’all claim that the evidence isn’t actually evidence.

Kind of like where you stick your fingers in your ear about that same type and level of evidence re: voter fraud.

Funny that.

Not to mention the evidence of Biden selling influence. More evidence of that than most of the stuff Lad takes as a given.

There is far more evidence of the allegations of Trump than there is of voter fraud - I'm still waiting for hard evidence of voter fraud. Anything outside of these affidavits and wild speculations will do.

I'm glad y'all are tacitly admitting to the evidence against Trump now. We all seem to be on the same page.