(02-13-2020 05:41 PM)MaddDawgz02 Wrote:  

(02-13-2020 05:38 PM)TXHuskieJA26 Wrote:  

(02-13-2020 05:35 PM)Big Red Wrote:  

(02-13-2020 04:31 PM)calvin12 Wrote:  

(02-13-2020 01:49 PM)Big Red Wrote:  If it's not going to be in Husky Stadium, then yes, I agree that this particular stadium is a great fit. However, the location of the stadium is 100% terrible. There is literally no attraction or draw for any other team to want to come to Bridgeview to play a football game. And why would they? If this stadium was in Gary, IN, it would be no different. A great stadium in a terrible location = don't do it.

Had this been pitched initially to BYU as the original location of the game, there's no way in hell BYU agrees to it. Hell, I'm surprised they didn't back out of the game when the location was changed. I'm sure they weren't stoked about coming to DeKalb, but if its gonna be changed, moving it to Brideview would be a "no deal" for me if I'm the AD at BYU. Wanna move it? Fine, put it somewhere in Chicago not in some collar community surrounded by train tracks. Just think how stoked the BYU players will be on that commute out to Brideview.

Talk about an experience they'll never forget.

commute to bridgeview is much better than the one to DeKalb. Great stadium in a terrible location don't do it, there's a place called green bay that would disagree with you. I don't like moving the game out of Huskie Stadium at all, but its a much better option than Wrigley, Sox, or Soldier fields would be. Its also a much better commute than Washington state to Chicago as you had the game in Husky Stadium

So, you think NIU would draw better at SeatGeek than at Wrigley?

Alright....

Personally, I prefer to play games in locations where you actually have 2 endzones!

And at a place where urinating is not a group activity