(10-26-2019 03:49 PM)Frizzy Owl Wrote:  I'm not in favor of firing him. One bad hire compared to the good he's done isn't reason enough.

A) in fairness, there has been more than one at least questionable hire/fire/extension decision/handling.

B) many of the 'good' things that have happened were suggested here on the Parliament long before they were put into action. He gets credit for actually doing it, but I wonder if we would give a ton of credit to someone who was (as an example) hired because he had done downsizing elsewhere who was hired to do a downsizing and he came in and downsized. Even if he has been undeniably successful to this point, the current question is... what's next?

There has certainly been some good and I haven't done a SWOT analysis to determine where we fall, but I just want to be clear that I don't believe there is anyone on here favoring firing him solely based on Bloomgren