(06-24-2019 12:49 PM)Sideshow2313 Wrote:  

(06-24-2019 12:28 PM)Flat Tire 2 Wrote:  

(06-24-2019 12:29 AM)Sideshow2313 Wrote:  

(06-23-2019 11:37 PM)DustMyBroom Wrote:  

(06-23-2019 10:45 PM)Sideshow2313 Wrote:  

I love flat out ignorant comments like this. You just informed everyone that you don’t know what you are talking about.

(06-23-2019 11:38 PM)Sideshow2313 Wrote:  

(06-23-2019 10:53 PM)rileylives Wrote:  Marshall and academics? Are you talking about grey shirts/props?

I’m of the opinion they have a place, but that’s an entirely too long philosophical discussion...

Yes not allowed in AAC, NCAA minimum is minimum for admission to the university.

As for Marshall, everybody is Carnegie classification school so that means nothing. Most of AAC has been in conference with Marshall and Presidents/Boosters have seen who they get on their team. MU has had a competitive advantage yet people know MU can't pull that in AAC; so that's a huge negative indicator wither MU can be competitive in FB.

Wow, your lack of knowledge regarding the Carnegie classification is appalling.

See list " Doctoral Universities – Very high research activity "

I see most of the candidates on the list, yet Marshall is R2 which is lower than R1.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_re...ted_States

FYI; the wikipedia list is not up to date. I hope you wouldn't use wikipedia for a college research paper. I am not pimping Marshall, I am just trying to help you. For example, USM is listed as an R2 on your reference link, but they are an R1 classification. Here is a more reliable link.

http://carnegieclassifications.iu.edu/