(03-13-2019 03:13 PM)UN-SEA-W Hoops Wrote:  

(03-13-2019 03:09 PM)Seahawkhoops Wrote:  

(03-13-2019 02:51 PM)UN-SEA-W Hoops Wrote:  

(03-13-2019 02:40 PM)dan10 Wrote:  

(03-13-2019 01:09 PM)Gary Miller Wrote:  Agreed. Neither team looked like a tourney team.

You expected them to? You are talking about 2 teams that had 2 Q1 wins combined before today, despite playing a full ACC schedule.

I expect the ACC to be favored every time there is a dollar to be made by the NCAA. For example, see Syracuse (pick from any number of years in recent memory where they were on the bubble).


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I'm a Cuse fan and have questioned there selection a few times, that said, every time i've questioned it, they have went on a run

This is true. But I don’t remember a ‘Cuse team scoring 24 points in a full game on 17% shooting in those seasons either. And I can’t speak on Clemson but in the few games I’ve seen them this year, there are some wholly more deserving mid-majors out there. My main point is, when the selection committee is involved the almighty dollar reigns supreme.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

This right here. NCSU’s entire resume combined with the game that they scored a total of 24 pats in on 17% shooting shouldn’t have them anywhere near selection.

And no, I don’t think anyone expected them to look like a tournament team.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro