(10-04-2017 07:20 PM)XLance Wrote:  

(10-04-2017 07:10 PM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  

(10-04-2017 02:16 PM)TerryD Wrote:  

(10-04-2017 02:01 PM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  

(10-04-2017 01:51 PM)msm96wolf Wrote:  UCONN and Blumenthal took a gamble and it bombed. Not blaming them for trying but many in the ACC still remember state of CT was the face of the law suit. Too many are still alive in the ACC office that remember. Swofford does not like to be challenged publically. As long as he is alive, he will influence the ACC after he retires. When he does retire, the next commissioner will likely be pro football.

Personally, my money is on this man to be Swofford's replacement when he retires.

I will continue to say this and it doesn't matter what you or JRsec (who's very wrong about the reach of 'Cuse and BC re: UCONN) think and/or say.......The 2003 lawsuit excuse died the day the ACC invited Pitt.

No amount of spin will change that fact. Deal with it.

Deal with what, exactly?

People not accepting the fact that the 2003 lawsuit excuse died the day Pitt was invited to the ACC.

I can assure you, it did not.
UConn screwed the pooch with the lawsuit and will have to live with the consequences.

How exactly can you assure me that the lawsuit excuse is still a valid excuse? I wait for your proof with baited breath.