The unofficial online home for fans of the University of Cincinnati Bearcats. Part of Collegiate Sports Nation (CSN).

(11-18-2017 11:47 AM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  Claw backs don't have room for interpretation. Binary solution.

Creativity and thinking around corners is what deal makers in corporate law do.

It's not hard. His Nibs and his cronies want everything they want where they want it, and they want $$ to do it. FCC fans are brainwashed into thinking this is the only way because hatbis what they have been told and they eat it up. It's what pro sports fans do. There are so many ways to make this work but exactly zero if the party seeking free money doesn't want to play the game.

If you had a thriving business would you want to go into business with mike brown. Please answer that.

I don’t care what the city politicians say. It’s what the mls says that matters. They hold all of the cards as they have plenty of demand for a product(mls franchises) that they have complete control over. If they don’t want shared stadiums anymore then they don’t have to award franchises to cities that won’t bite. ITS NOT THAT HARD.

To be clear I don’t think it should be in Cincinnati as those taxpayers have been hit with two stadiums already. I’m just saying that to continue to bang the PBS drum seems pointless.

Mls demands aside it would destroy the very enjoyable atmosphere at FCC games. Which is a huge part of the appeal of soccer. People are actually engaged and watching the game.