PAC 10

Hello There, Guest! (Login — Register)

Media

Football

Men's Basketball

Women's Basketball

Baseball

Softball

Men's Soccer

Women's Soccer

Volleyball

Open TigerLinks

Threaded Mode \| Linear Mode PAC 10
Author	Message

memtiger1987 Offline

All American

Posts: 4,882
Joined: May 2010
Reputation: 261
I Root For: Memphis
Location:

Post: #17

RE: PAC 10

(07-20-2022 08:22 PM)ncrdbl1 Wrote:
(07-20-2022 01:57 PM)memtiger1987 Wrote:
(07-20-2022 12:06 PM)MemTigers1998 Wrote: No way on Earth do all of the west coast liberal clowns at Stanford & Cal Bezerkley, Oregon, Washington, etc allow BYU into their league. I could see the PAC making a pitch to Houston to get into Texas at which point the geniuses in the Big 12 would offer SMU to keep a “share of the Texas market” or would they be as dumb as Aresco and offer Rice to keep the Houston market like the AAC did?

Not so fast my friend…. Times have drastically changed. The Stanford and Cal’s risk being plunged into complete irrelevancy if the PAC blows up. If the PAC doesn’t do something soon, you might see Utah, Arizona, ASU, ans Colorado bolt for the B12.

The same thing was said about BYU and the B12 until Texas and OU bolted. Sound familiar?

The Big XII has nothing to offer these teams.

All it ever had was the Texas TV market that it no longer controls.

The SEC now owns the Texas TV market and the Big XII doesn't control a single top 20 TV market.

Without counting California the PAC 12 still has complete control of Phoenix, Denver, and Seattle.

No reason to leave PAC for the Big XII.

The teams in the PAC are running scared after USC and UCLA split. It’s a known fact that both Oregon and Wash were lobbying the B1G for a spot. The others obviously know this and also know if both of those teams leave, the conference is trashed. So while Utah, Colorado, Arizona, and ASU would have laughed about joining the B12 a couple of months ago, they’re seriously considering it now. They’ve finally realized there is no loyalty and the top two remaining teams are actively shopping themselves. A more stable spot is, believe it or not, the B12 and the bigger TV contract is almost positively the B12. The PAC is going to get a significantly smaller TV deal. One because the 2 big draws have left, two because the next two are trying to.

Look at the projected TV deals for the B12 and the PAC (now that the LA teams are leaving). The PAC is in a world of hurt, and their new TV contract will reflect losing their best programs and their current instability.

I wouldn’t be surprised at all to see teams bolt for the B12.

(This post was last modified: 07-20-2022 08:36 PM by memtiger1987.)

07-20-2022 08:35 PM

« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Messages In This Thread

PAC 10 - CKMcDan - 07-20-2022, 12:01 PM

RE: PAC 10 - MemTigers1998 - 07-20-2022, 12:06 PM

RE: PAC 10 - memtiger1987 - 07-20-2022, 01:57 PM

RE: PAC 10 - ncrdbl1 - 07-20-2022, 08:22 PM

RE: PAC 10 - memtiger1987 - 07-20-2022 08:35 PM

RE: PAC 10 - hk25 - 07-21-2022, 01:05 AM

RE: PAC 10 - ncrdbl1 - 07-20-2022, 08:08 PM

RE: PAC 10 - tigerfan39 - 07-20-2022, 12:07 PM

RE: PAC 10 - Hernando Hills Tiger - 07-20-2022, 12:57 PM

RE: PAC 10 - EarthBoundMisfit - 07-20-2022, 01:31 PM

RE: PAC 10 - tigerfan39 - 07-20-2022, 01:36 PM

RE: PAC 10 - Tiger87 - 07-20-2022, 01:47 PM

RE: PAC 10 - EarthBoundMisfit - 07-20-2022, 01:52 PM

RE: PAC 10 - EarthBoundMisfit - 07-20-2022, 01:50 PM

RE: PAC 10 - tigerfan39 - 07-20-2022, 03:38 PM

RE: PAC 10 - former guest - 07-20-2022, 01:51 PM

RE: PAC 10 - Atlanta - 07-21-2022, 05:50 AM

RE: PAC 10 - gotigers1 - 07-21-2022, 07:07 PM

RE: PAC 10 - ImaTiger - 07-20-2022, 01:19 PM

RE: PAC 10 - AlonsoWDC - 07-20-2022, 04:44 PM

RE: PAC 10 - UofMemphis - 07-20-2022, 08:40 PM

RE: PAC 10 - former guest - 07-20-2022, 10:56 PM

RE: PAC 10 - CatsClaw1 - 07-21-2022, 08:42 AM

RE: PAC 10 - Tiger87 - 07-21-2022, 09:09 AM

RE: PAC 10 - southpaw1 - 07-21-2022, 10:07 AM

RE: PAC 10 - Crazier - 07-21-2022, 11:00 AM

RE: PAC 10 - memtiger1987 - 07-21-2022, 02:33 PM

RE: PAC 10 - Crazier - 07-21-2022, 03:32 PM

RE: PAC 10 - true_blue_thru_and_thru - 07-21-2022, 03:53 PM

RE: PAC 10 - memtiger1987 - 07-21-2022, 04:10 PM

RE: PAC 10 - ncrdbl1 - 07-21-2022, 05:48 PM

RE: PAC 10 - Browning Hall - 07-21-2022, 08:33 PM

RE: PAC 10 - ncrdbl1 - 07-21-2022, 05:03 PM

RE: PAC 10 - memtiger1987 - 07-21-2022, 06:28 PM

RE: PAC 10 - southpaw1 - 07-21-2022, 07:24 PM

RE: PAC 10 - memtiger1987 - 07-21-2022, 09:53 PM

RE: PAC 10 - ncrdbl1 - 07-22-2022, 02:20 AM

RE: PAC 10 - memtiger1987 - 07-22-2022, 06:17 AM

RE: PAC 10 - RockyMTNTiger - 07-21-2022, 12:02 PM

RE: PAC 10 - hk25 - 07-21-2022, 01:35 PM

RE: PAC 10 - tigerlands - 07-21-2022, 07:02 PM

RE: PAC 10 - CatsClaw1 - 07-21-2022, 08:33 PM

RE: PAC 10 - Browning Hall - 07-21-2022, 09:30 PM

RE: PAC 10 - memtiger1987 - 07-21-2022, 09:56 PM

RE: PAC 10 - MemTigers1998 - 07-22-2022, 08:29 AM

RE: PAC 10 - true_blue_thru_and_thru - 07-22-2022, 08:34 AM

User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Official Links

Unofficial Links