The unofficial online home for fans of the University of Cincinnati Bearcats. Part of Collegiate Sports Nation (CSN).

(11-12-2019 04:12 AM)Miggy Wrote:  Shouldn’t grade players on limited stats, when stats are incomplete and not equal. Actually think you should wait to assign grades till each player has a greater body of work.

Moorman had a great first game. No need to mention that his playing time should be limited as he played terrific in Temple’s first game. Also, in 28 minutes of play in Morgan State game, he did a lot of positive things in Morgan State game, including seven rebounds, and no turnovers, and but one foul.

I dealt with Scott’s performance under Morgan State topic. Will say that Scot making two streals, , committing no turnovers, and making one block in only 14 minutes of play, is quality D-1basketball.

These "grades" are done for each game, and are accumulated as the season progresses, as they are with PER and other stats. The productivity stats/"grades" aren't any less fair than PER stats, etc., which all begin to be computed from game 1 onwards.

Regarding assigning "grades," I should make it clear that these grades are only for their productivity (pts, rb, ast, stl, blk).

Like "PER" and other advanced stats, these productivity summaries only tell part of the story. However, they do tell a very important part of the story.

Regarding Moorman, he has put up very disappointing stats thus far, and 9 pts and 5 rebounds was no better than an average performance for JP in 30 minutes of play in game 1, especially compared to his productivity as a freshman. Game 2 was a disastrous performance.

The productivity stats for Perry were much better than for Moorman in the first two games, suggesting that he should be playing more than 14 mpg.