(10-09-2018 10:29 AM)thxjoenovak Wrote:  

(10-09-2018 09:56 AM)7 Wrote:  

(10-09-2018 09:31 AM)MaddDawgz02 Wrote:  

(10-08-2018 09:53 PM)Rabid Squirrel Wrote:  

(10-08-2018 05:10 PM)Djud Wrote:  A QB will likely have a low Y/A rating with the offensive scheme, although 7.9 is actually pretty good (currently only 42 NCAA QBs have higher); 4.4 is really bad. The difference between Santa and Childers was the actual vertical threat. Santa would hit receivers on deep routes, in stride with regularity. Most (maybe all) of Childers passes for long yards are on short passes that have significant YAC. I agree with many on this thread that without the deep threat, all other aspects of the offense have to be perfect.

I’d estimate that Childers has left between 200-250 yards on the field by missing some open deep routes that many FBS qbs would make. That would have his Y/A up to around 5.5. Probably just a little shy of where it should be with this offense and these WRs. There really is no big time playmakers at receiver. Not the kind we need. We need quick, elusive guys who can take short passes and do the rest running. We have a few straight line fast guys who need a big arm, accurate qb to hit them deep.

I would estimate in the past 4 years Carey has left 12 wins on the field.

LOL

Wow. I'm no backer of Rod and his in game decision making and play calling but that statement is classic.