(04-03-2026 01:49 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(04-02-2026 03:52 PM)Redbanksdog Wrote:  

(04-02-2026 03:07 PM)bearcat65 Wrote:  

(04-02-2026 01:29 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(04-02-2026 10:38 AM)bearcat65 Wrote:  So you don't think a nuclear armed Iran is a threat to us or our allies? You would be one of the few.

The issue posed prior to your response wasnt the retort to replied with, mind you.

The issue is the imminent threat, sir. Not your broad generalized comment that you think is quite the comeback. Again, note the issue of *imminent* that you simply shelved in your rush to try and post some form of comeback.

To answer your separate question -- a nuclear armed iran *could* be a threat to us or our allies. Which is *not* the issue posed, that is 'is a necear armed Iran a viability in the urgency to smack them'?

If you want to extend the length of time to encompass your general reply, I think the country of Angola if armed with nukes *could* be a threat to us or our allies -- to simply highlight the issue for you. In no way do we need to stop that effort with a month+ special military operation. Just like what is happening with Iran presently.

Hard to reply to this as it appears to be the incoherent ramblings of someone who seems to think he can read other people's minds.

That's the way he Rolls. He likes to muddy the water so to speak. That's why he said "The issue is the imminent threat" He sounds like he's not worried until they pull the triggers. In his world it has to be imminent for him to worry about it.

I guess you don’t understand the very common word ‘imminent’. Bummer.

I understand the definition of imminent and I know you do to but nice try. Bummer