(08-25-2018 04:55 PM)Zombiewoof Wrote:  Could it possibly be true that some Trump followers could be wrong about Meuller? Everything we know of Meuller indicates that he is principled to a fault, shuns the limelight, is meticulously thorough and ultimately wouldn't suggest charging Trump with a crime, even if he found one. So why all of the chest thumping about Meuller and his investigations? Why not let it play out and see how it ends up? He apparently isn't the type of guy that likes to waste time; he is simply detail driven. I have a lot more confidence that the investigations will provide answers we can trust, largely because of Meuller. And I suspect the final report to the DOJ will land without nearly the fanfare many are expecting.

Quote:Hatfill became "the subject of a flood of news media coverage beginning in mid-2002, after television cameras showed Federal Bureau of Investigation agents in biohazard suits searching his apartment" and then Attorney General John Ashcroft named him "person of interest" in the investigation on national television.[1] Hatfill's home was repeatedly raided by the FBI, his phone was tapped, and he was extensively surveilled for more than two years; he was also fired from his job at Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC).[2] "At a news conference in August 2002, Hatfill tearfully denied that he had anything to do with the anthrax letters and said irresponsible news media coverage based on government leaks had destroyed his reputation".[1] Hatfill filed a lawsuit in 2003, accusing the FBI agents and Justice Department officials who led the criminal investigation of leaking information about him to the press in violation of the federal Privacy Act.[1]

In 2008, the government settled Hatfill's lawsuit for $4.6 million.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_Hatfill

Guess who ran that investigation?

Seriously, you need to take some time and read about Bueller's history. It's not nearly what you'd have us believe.