(08-18-2018 01:23 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(08-18-2018 01:17 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(08-18-2018 12:26 PM)banker Wrote:  

(08-18-2018 10:26 AM)shere khan Wrote:  "I didn’t mean that he committed treason, but it was a term that I used, nothing short of treasonous"

https://www.breitbart.com/video/2018/08/...d-treason/

what an idiot

So what he meant was that he was treasonous, but didn't commit treason? Is that like telling your wife that you weren't unfaithful, you just acted unfaithfully?

The explanation makes no sense.

Most hyperbolic liberal tv folks have a problem with the concept that words actually mean things. Just a few days ago Brennan was seriously trying to make the case that a laugh line in a Trump stump speech (Hey Russia, help Hillary find her lost emails) was proof of Trump campaign collusion with the Russians. Yes—Brennan was actually serious and made the charge in a recent newspaper OpEd. The man is unhinged and appears to possibly be metally unstable. No way he needs acess to government classified information.

Good point. It also explains the trendy overuse of words and phrases like literally and to be clear. Every time I hear those code words I know a truck load of manure is on its way