(03-24-2021 12:35 PM)mapdude Wrote: (03-24-2021 11:39 AM)Stammers Wrote: You are absolutely right.
2.7 to 10.3 to 18.9 to 19.7. The argument is still won.
Wrong. Martin and Dandridge do not play the same position. Different skill sets. Different responsibilities on the floor. Simple facts.
Dandridge shot 28.6% for FG, all within 2 feet of the basket against Dayton. It is a blessing that he only TOOK 7 shots because he only made 2. And how many of those shots were rebounds of his own miss?
We can agree to disagree.
Since you STILL aren't bright enough (which is mind boggling) to understand, I'll explain it to you in point form, in the most simple way possible.
- Improvement and potential have nothing to do with what position a player plays. It is hilarious that this is a point of discussion
- Dandridge is at 56.4% for the season and was at over 59% before the game you decided you want to kick him off the team
- You want him to transfer because he went 2-7 in a 1st round NIT game
- IMO, so called "fans" who cheer for multiple players to leave, are trash
- He doesn't measure up to your lowest of the low, bottom of the barrel personal standards, which is hilarious
Compare him and Cisse to Houston's best big man Gorham...
Gorham SR
27.6 MIN
8.5 PTS
8.6 REB
0.4 BLK
50.0 FG%
68.6 FT%
Cisse FR & Dandridge SOPH
31.8 MIN
11.2 PTS
8.7 REB
2.4 BLK
55.6 FG%
33.3 FT%
He isn't perfect, but he is a sophmore, and along with Cisse, they make us very respectable at center, with a high ceiling to keep improving.
The AUP prevents us from being honest in our evaluation of you. Let's just say, a potted plant would destroy you in a game of Jeopardy and leave it at that.