![]() |
|
LA Times Asks: Is Beto Just A Pretty Face With No Substance? - Printable Version +- CSNbbs (https://csnbbs.com) +-- Forum: Active Boards (/forum-769.html) +--- Forum: Lounge (/forum-564.html) +---- Forum: The Spin Room (/forum-540.html) +---- Thread: LA Times Asks: Is Beto Just A Pretty Face With No Substance? (/thread-872979.html) |
LA Times Asks: Is Beto Just A Pretty Face With No Substance? - usmbacker - 03-18-2019 05:22 PM The left media seems to be targeting Francis. And the answer to their question is yes. Quote:The most striking thing about the Democrats’ newest presidential candidate is that he’s so hard to pin down. Link RE: LA Times Asks: Is Beto Just A Pretty Face With No Substance? - JMUDunk - 03-18-2019 05:25 PM If they're asking that question already, someone's got the long knives out for Francis. LA Times Asks: Is Beto Just A Pretty Face With No Substance? - EverRespect - 03-18-2019 05:28 PM They picked Homewrecker Harris. Everyone else needs to be destroyed. They'll rig it against Bernie. Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk RE: LA Times Asks: Is Beto Just A Pretty Face With No Substance? - THE NC Herd Fan - 03-18-2019 05:40 PM To LA Times, one word... YES!!!! RE: LA Times Asks: Is Beto Just A Pretty Face With No Substance? - Kronke - 03-18-2019 05:50 PM (03-18-2019 05:28 PM)EverRespect Wrote: They picked Homewrecker Harris. Everyone else needs to be destroyed. They'll rig it against Bernie. Latest polling out of WI has her in 5th place at.. lol.. 5%. LA Times Asks: Is Beto Just A Pretty Face With No Substance? - B_Hawk06 - 03-18-2019 05:52 PM Yes. And he should be well aware the leftists media already out to tar and feather him indicates he has no fair shot in hell of winning the ticket. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro RE: LA Times Asks: Is Beto Just A Pretty Face With No Substance? - Kronke - 03-18-2019 05:53 PM I've called my shot. The ticket will be either bernie/Tulsi or biden/beto. Book it. And neither will be able to beat Trump, because this battle between the inter-sectional crowd and the pragmatists is going to rip this party to shreds. I got my popcorn, what about you? RE: LA Times Asks: Is Beto Just A Pretty Face With No Substance? - blah - 03-18-2019 06:02 PM (03-18-2019 05:22 PM)usmbacker Wrote: The left media seems to be targeting Francis. And the answer to their question is yes. I'm glad the article told us what Obama's signature issue was. I never would have guessed it..... RE: LA Times Asks: Is Beto Just A Pretty Face With No Substance? - miko33 - 03-18-2019 06:03 PM Biden will win the nomination. I doubt he chooses any of the current twits running. LA Times Asks: Is Beto Just A Pretty Face With No Substance? - fsquid - 03-18-2019 06:13 PM So far, yes Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk RE: LA Times Asks: Is Beto Just A Pretty Face With No Substance? - Native Georgian - 03-18-2019 09:56 PM So far, O’Rourke seems immune to embarrassment. But make no mistake: the longer he insists on dragging out this absurd campaign for the presidential nomination, the worse it’s going to get. Unless he has the good sense to get out first, he will be a laughingstock when it’s over. RE: LA Times Asks: Is Beto Just A Pretty Face With No Substance? - hawghiggs - 03-18-2019 10:09 PM Andrew Yang? RE: LA Times Asks: Is Beto Just A Pretty Face With No Substance? - EverRespect - 03-19-2019 05:41 AM (03-18-2019 09:56 PM)Native Georgian Wrote: So far, O’Rourke seems immune to embarrassment. But make no mistake: the longer he insists on dragging out this absurd campaign for the presidential nomination, the worse it’s going to get. Unless he has the good sense to get out first, he will be a laughingstock when it’s over.Another guy immune to embarrassment is Trump. I wouldn't write Beto off so quickly. In the last week, he has managed to get Bernie and AOC off the front page and replaced them with himself. If he can make it all about him, he can win. Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk LA Times Asks: Is Beto Just A Pretty Face With No Substance? - JMUDunk - 03-19-2019 06:49 AM (03-18-2019 05:53 PM)Kronke Wrote: I've called my shot. The ticket will be either bernie/Tulsi or biden/beto. Book it. Duly popped, My guess is crazy uncle Joe and chamalla on the undercard. The unintended groping tween the two should be epic! Both with a lifetime of experience... RE: LA Times Asks: Is Beto Just A Pretty Face With No Substance? - BadgerMJ - 03-19-2019 07:47 AM I heard it put that Beto "speaks in political tongues". In other words, he seems to have an ability make people hear what they want to hear from his speeches. Seems to be working so far, he raised over $6 million in 24 hours. https://www.politico.com/story/2019/03/18/beto-orourke-2020-6-million-dollars-1224704 The lefties and their sock-puppets in the media should be scared. If Trump showed anything, someone who can connect with the people HAS a shot at winning. RE: LA Times Asks: Is Beto Just A Pretty Face With No Substance? - SoMs Eagle - 03-19-2019 08:01 AM (03-19-2019 07:47 AM)BadgerMJ Wrote: I heard it put that Beto "speaks in political tongues". In other words, he seems to have an ability make people hear what they want to hear from his speeches. Barry. Trump. Beto. Sure he has a shot..... Never happen though. He has nothing none of the ‘it’ factor going for him. Can’t give a speech like Barry. Can’t get the point across like Trump. The Ichabod thing is something to see though. RE: LA Times Asks: Is Beto Just A Pretty Face With No Substance? - Owl 69/70/75 - 03-19-2019 04:40 PM (03-19-2019 07:47 AM)BadgerMJ Wrote: I heard it put that Beto "speaks in political tongues". In other words, he seems to have an ability make people hear what they want to hear from his speeches. Knowing the O’Rourkes, he’s been raised to be a politician since he was a child. RE: LA Times Asks: Is Beto Just A Pretty Face With No Substance? - Native Georgian - 03-19-2019 07:06 PM (03-19-2019 05:41 AM)EverRespect Wrote:True about Trump being immune to embarrassment. But he also had an issue (restricting immigration) that both resonated with the nominating electorate and was intentionally ignored (if not outright rejected) by the other GOP candidates.(03-18-2019 09:56 PM)Native Georgian Wrote: So far, O’Rourke seems immune to embarrassment. But make no mistake: the longer he insists on dragging out this absurd campaign for the presidential nomination, the worse it’s going to get. Unless he has the good sense to get out first, he will be a laughingstock when it’s over.Another guy immune to embarrassment is Trump. I wouldn't write Beto off so quickly. In the last week, he has managed to get Bernie and AOC off the front page and replaced them with himself. If he can make it all about him, he can win. I don’t see how O’Rourke has any comparable edge over his Dem-primary rivals. There isn’t any issue or cause associated with his name. Everything he offers, the other candidates offer it, too, plus the race/gender angle which goes against him. RE: LA Times Asks: Is Beto Just A Pretty Face With No Substance? - shere khan - 03-19-2019 09:00 PM ![]() Beto ![]() How completely ridiculous. Democrats are in deep doo doo. It's s shame. People deserve a rational choice. |