(12-18-2012 07:47 AM)ctipton Wrote:  EXCLUSIVE: Sneak peek at UC's plans for Nippert revamp
7:09 AM, Dec 18, 2012


A skydiver parachute lands at Nippert Stadium with the UC flag before the Bearcats' Sept. 15 game against Delaware State. / The Enquirer/Joseph Fuqua II

Written by
Cliff Peale

A renovation of Nippert Stadium could add as many as 28 elevated private suites and 41 loge boxes for up to $70 million, University of Cincinnati leaders are expected to announce today.

The addition of a pavilion on the western side of the on-campus stadium would create about 1,800 seats that UC hopes would create millions of dollars in new revenue.

The remainder of the cost could come from private donations and naming rights to the new pavilion, University Architect Beth McGrew said.

McGrew commissioned the market study and drew up the plans several years ago. But the Nippert renovation has become an urgent priority now as UC seeks a new conference home with the Atlantic Coast Conference and welcomes new football coach Tommy Tuberville.

While UC President Santa Ono has said he didn’t promise the renovation to either Tuberville or the ACC, he made it clear that raising private money for the football stadium is a top priority.

UC also wants to renovate Fifth Third Arena at a cost of more than $100 million, and build a new law school that could cost about $60 million.

At Nippert, some of the new premium seats at would replace existing seats, so the project won’t add much to the current capacity of about 35,000. UC also hopes to improve the concourse with new restrooms and concessions, replacing the antiquated infrastructure that Nippert holds now.

http://news.cincinnati.com/article/20121218/SPT0101/312170156/EXCLUSIVE-Sneak-peek-at-UC-s-plans-for-Nippert-revamp?source=nletter-nletter-breakingnews

(12-18-2012 08:41 AM)pat5775 Wrote:  Wait... what?? I could have sworn increasing the capacity of Nippert was the top priority... what's the point of adding only a couple thousand extra seats?

Granted, the addition of private boxes and boxes is badly needed, but why not add 10,000+ seats?

(12-18-2012 08:41 AM)pat5775 Wrote:  Wait... what?? I could have sworn increasing the capacity of Nippert was the top priority... what's the point of adding only a couple thousand extra seats?

Granted, the addition of private boxes and boxes is badly needed, but why not add 10,000+ seats?

(12-18-2012 08:43 AM)Murph29 Wrote:  

(12-18-2012 08:41 AM)pat5775 Wrote:  Wait... what?? I could have sworn increasing the capacity of Nippert was the top priority... what's the point of adding only a couple thousand extra seats?

Granted, the addition of private boxes and boxes is badly needed, but why not add 10,000+ seats?

Luxury boxes are actually probably the financial priority here. You have to have them, they bring in much bigger dollars and are sold the companies so they're not going to be like extra regular seats which may or may not sell.

(12-18-2012 08:45 AM)pat5775 Wrote:  

(12-18-2012 08:43 AM)Murph29 Wrote:  

(12-18-2012 08:41 AM)pat5775 Wrote:  Wait... what?? I could have sworn increasing the capacity of Nippert was the top priority... what's the point of adding only a couple thousand extra seats?

Granted, the addition of private boxes and boxes is badly needed, but why not add 10,000+ seats?

Luxury boxes are actually probably the financial priority here. You have to have them, they bring in much bigger dollars and are sold the companies so they're not going to be like extra regular seats which may or may not sell.

Great point. I guess they gotta take one step at a time. Much needed luxury boxes first, increase capacity later.

I can be patient.

(12-18-2012 10:05 AM)bearcatlawjd Wrote:  This isn't the 1980s or 1990's where bigger is better. Most newer stadiums focus on fan comfort and other luxury items to drive revenue. My guess is that UC would rather sell luxury boxes and create a high demand for their tickets than add 10,000 seats that will never be filled more than a few times each season.

I am very happy to hear that a basketball arena and a law school are the priority list for the University of Cincinnati. Any recent law grad knows that a law building should have been built already. A social science building should be on the agenda too.

(12-18-2012 10:07 AM)CliftonAve Wrote:  

(12-18-2012 10:05 AM)bearcatlawjd Wrote:  This isn't the 1980s or 1990's where bigger is better. Most newer stadiums focus on fan comfort and other luxury items to drive revenue. My guess is that UC would rather sell luxury boxes and create a high demand for their tickets than add 10,000 seats that will never be filled more than a few times each season.

I am very happy to hear that a basketball arena and a law school are the priority list for the University of Cincinnati. Any recent law grad knows that a law building should have been built already. A social science building should be on the agenda too.

The law school is another can of worms all together. The concept is going to very controversial.

(12-18-2012 10:16 AM)BearcatMan Wrote:  

(12-18-2012 10:07 AM)CliftonAve Wrote:  

(12-18-2012 10:05 AM)bearcatlawjd Wrote:  This isn't the 1980s or 1990's where bigger is better. Most newer stadiums focus on fan comfort and other luxury items to drive revenue. My guess is that UC would rather sell luxury boxes and create a high demand for their tickets than add 10,000 seats that will never be filled more than a few times each season.

I am very happy to hear that a basketball arena and a law school are the priority list for the University of Cincinnati. Any recent law grad knows that a law building should have been built already. A social science building should be on the agenda too.

The law school is another can of worms all together. The concept is going to very controversial.

I'm hearing the downtown angle is gaining steam with the need now for.more undergraduate classrooms on campus.

(12-18-2012 10:08 AM)cinbinsportsfan Wrote:  The basic premise is that you shouldn't add seats unless there is demand to do so, which there isn't. Had Nippert been sold out for consecutive season then it would have warranted adding 5k - 10k new seats. What there is demand for is premium seating and luxury boxes for top-tier donors and those who don't necessarily want to sit in bleachers/chair backs and would rather have private accommodations. This renovation fits their needs to a tee.

(12-18-2012 11:07 AM)kyucat Wrote:  I am sorry if luxury boxes are all they are adding it is not enough.

The stadium needs to seat at least 45,000 to give UC creditability in major college football. In fact 50,000 is really what shoud be the goal.