(06-24-2018 01:50 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(06-24-2018 01:47 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(06-24-2018 12:12 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(06-24-2018 12:07 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(06-24-2018 11:26 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  I support strong public accommodations protections for ALL. But if we don't have them, the following rules should apply

1) If you discriminate based upon class, you should clearly state that in ALL advertising. And by discriminate, that includes hiring too. And benefits.

2)If you discriminate you should be banned from ANY taxpayer benefits or subsidies or CONTRACTS. That would include access to admitting rights for discriminatory doctors at any hospital that has any taxpayer funding.

3) If there aren't any providers that will serve a community in EVERY AREA, then the government must provide a FULLY EQUAL (cost and location and service level provision) public option. That means, building hospitals, public schools with offerings equal to voucher private schools for people excluded from those schools, and having the state hire doctors and specialists and staff them everywhere so that discriminated persons don't have to ever wait so much as one second more for service. It would also require either a ban on any doctor accepting ANY insurance plan from discriminating or the state to have a public option insurance plan at the same price as the lowest discriminatory plan rate with the same coverage.

I just want to know who doesn't want my business so I can take it elsewhere. Much easier than lawsuits and forcing them to begrudgingly serve me. I'd rather just give my money to someone who wants my business. If someone can run a business and thrive while openly discriminating against whatever group, more power to them. They should be required to be open about it. Wouldn't you rather a sign on a restaurant that says "gays not welcome" than to unknowingly go in and pay for a meal plus tip to benefit someone that thinks that way but is not allowed to say it?

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

I would rather not be discriminated against. For small minorities, discrimination frequently means a loss of service at the same price and in some cases, it means no service at all.

There isn't enough demand for a LGBT friendly gas station in many areas. What is the state going to put up signs on the freeway stating... No Gas or Restrooms for LGBT people for the next 200 miles?

How would a gas station know you’re gay?

(06-24-2018 01:55 PM)bullet Wrote:  

(06-24-2018 11:26 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(06-24-2018 10:38 AM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(06-24-2018 10:25 AM)shere khan Wrote:  I like it. Tell me you don't want my money. I will oblige you

I think the law should be to have a sign in the window specifying whose money you don't want: blacks, gays, white men, Trump supporters, pink pusssy hat wearers, people who own Confederate flags, people who own American flags... I want to know. If I knew this place didn't want business from Trump supporters, I would have found somewhere else to eat in Lexington... or kept going to Mrs. Rowe's in Staunton.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

I support strong public accommodations protections for ALL. But if we don't have them, the following rules should apply

1) If you discriminate based upon class, you should clearly state that in ALL advertising. And by discriminate, that includes hiring too. And benefits.

2)If you discriminate you should be banned from ANY taxpayer benefits or subsidies or CONTRACTS. That would include access to admitting rights for discriminatory doctors at any hospital that has any taxpayer funding.

3) If there aren't any providers that will serve a community in EVERY AREA, then the government must provide a FULLY EQUAL (cost and location and service level provision) public option. That means, building hospitals, public schools with offerings equal to voucher private schools for people excluded from those schools, and having the state hire doctors and specialists and staff them everywhere so that discriminated persons don't have to ever wait so much as one second more for service. It would also require either a ban on any doctor accepting ANY insurance plan from discriminating or the state to have a public option insurance plan at the same price as the lowest discriminatory plan rate with the same coverage.

Just like you supported the DHS Secretary being able to eat her dinner in public without a threatening group cussing and yelling at her.

Wait, you thought that was just fine.

You're like the frat kid who got badly hazed as a Freshman who is the worst at harrassing the new kids when he is a Senior..

(06-24-2018 01:47 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(06-24-2018 12:12 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(06-24-2018 12:07 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(06-24-2018 11:26 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(06-24-2018 10:38 AM)EverRespect Wrote:  I think the law should be to have a sign in the window specifying whose money you don't want: blacks, gays, white men, Trump supporters, pink pusssy hat wearers, people who own Confederate flags, people who own American flags... I want to know. If I knew this place didn't want business from Trump supporters, I would have found somewhere else to eat in Lexington... or kept going to Mrs. Rowe's in Staunton.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

I support strong public accommodations protections for ALL. But if we don't have them, the following rules should apply

1) If you discriminate based upon class, you should clearly state that in ALL advertising. And by discriminate, that includes hiring too. And benefits.

2)If you discriminate you should be banned from ANY taxpayer benefits or subsidies or CONTRACTS. That would include access to admitting rights for discriminatory doctors at any hospital that has any taxpayer funding.

3) If there aren't any providers that will serve a community in EVERY AREA, then the government must provide a FULLY EQUAL (cost and location and service level provision) public option. That means, building hospitals, public schools with offerings equal to voucher private schools for people excluded from those schools, and having the state hire doctors and specialists and staff them everywhere so that discriminated persons don't have to ever wait so much as one second more for service. It would also require either a ban on any doctor accepting ANY insurance plan from discriminating or the state to have a public option insurance plan at the same price as the lowest discriminatory plan rate with the same coverage.

I just want to know who doesn't want my business so I can take it elsewhere. Much easier than lawsuits and forcing them to begrudgingly serve me. I'd rather just give my money to someone who wants my business. If someone can run a business and thrive while openly discriminating against whatever group, more power to them. They should be required to be open about it. Wouldn't you rather a sign on a restaurant that says "gays not welcome" than to unknowingly go in and pay for a meal plus tip to benefit someone that thinks that way but is not allowed to say it?

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

I would rather not be discriminated against. For small minorities, discrimination frequently means a loss of service at the same price and in some cases, it means no service at all.

There isn't enough demand for a LGBT friendly gas station in many areas. What is the state going to put up signs on the freeway stating... No Gas or Restrooms for LGBT people for the next 200 miles?

How would a gas station know you’re gay?

(06-24-2018 01:47 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(06-24-2018 12:12 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(06-24-2018 12:07 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(06-24-2018 11:26 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(06-24-2018 10:38 AM)EverRespect Wrote:  I think the law should be to have a sign in the window specifying whose money you don't want: blacks, gays, white men, Trump supporters, pink pusssy hat wearers, people who own Confederate flags, people who own American flags... I want to know. If I knew this place didn't want business from Trump supporters, I would have found somewhere else to eat in Lexington... or kept going to Mrs. Rowe's in Staunton.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

I support strong public accommodations protections for ALL. But if we don't have them, the following rules should apply

1) If you discriminate based upon class, you should clearly state that in ALL advertising. And by discriminate, that includes hiring too. And benefits.

2)If you discriminate you should be banned from ANY taxpayer benefits or subsidies or CONTRACTS. That would include access to admitting rights for discriminatory doctors at any hospital that has any taxpayer funding.

3) If there aren't any providers that will serve a community in EVERY AREA, then the government must provide a FULLY EQUAL (cost and location and service level provision) public option. That means, building hospitals, public schools with offerings equal to voucher private schools for people excluded from those schools, and having the state hire doctors and specialists and staff them everywhere so that discriminated persons don't have to ever wait so much as one second more for service. It would also require either a ban on any doctor accepting ANY insurance plan from discriminating or the state to have a public option insurance plan at the same price as the lowest discriminatory plan rate with the same coverage.

I just want to know who doesn't want my business so I can take it elsewhere. Much easier than lawsuits and forcing them to begrudgingly serve me. I'd rather just give my money to someone who wants my business. If someone can run a business and thrive while openly discriminating against whatever group, more power to them. They should be required to be open about it. Wouldn't you rather a sign on a restaurant that says "gays not welcome" than to unknowingly go in and pay for a meal plus tip to benefit someone that thinks that way but is not allowed to say it?

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

I would rather not be discriminated against. For small minorities, discrimination frequently means a loss of service at the same price and in some cases, it means no service at all.

There isn't enough demand for a LGBT friendly gas station in many areas. What is the state going to put up signs on the freeway stating... No Gas or Restrooms for LGBT people for the next 200 miles?

How would a gas station know you’re gay?

(06-24-2018 02:04 PM)ODUsmitty Wrote:  

(06-24-2018 01:47 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(06-24-2018 12:12 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(06-24-2018 12:07 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(06-24-2018 11:26 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  I support strong public accommodations protections for ALL. But if we don't have them, the following rules should apply

1) If you discriminate based upon class, you should clearly state that in ALL advertising. And by discriminate, that includes hiring too. And benefits.

2)If you discriminate you should be banned from ANY taxpayer benefits or subsidies or CONTRACTS. That would include access to admitting rights for discriminatory doctors at any hospital that has any taxpayer funding.

3) If there aren't any providers that will serve a community in EVERY AREA, then the government must provide a FULLY EQUAL (cost and location and service level provision) public option. That means, building hospitals, public schools with offerings equal to voucher private schools for people excluded from those schools, and having the state hire doctors and specialists and staff them everywhere so that discriminated persons don't have to ever wait so much as one second more for service. It would also require either a ban on any doctor accepting ANY insurance plan from discriminating or the state to have a public option insurance plan at the same price as the lowest discriminatory plan rate with the same coverage.

I just want to know who doesn't want my business so I can take it elsewhere. Much easier than lawsuits and forcing them to begrudgingly serve me. I'd rather just give my money to someone who wants my business. If someone can run a business and thrive while openly discriminating against whatever group, more power to them. They should be required to be open about it. Wouldn't you rather a sign on a restaurant that says "gays not welcome" than to unknowingly go in and pay for a meal plus tip to benefit someone that thinks that way but is not allowed to say it?

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

I would rather not be discriminated against. For small minorities, discrimination frequently means a loss of service at the same price and in some cases, it means no service at all.

There isn't enough demand for a LGBT friendly gas station in many areas. What is the state going to put up signs on the freeway stating... No Gas or Restrooms for LGBT people for the next 200 miles?

How would a gas station know you’re gay?

If you come in driving a Prius.

(06-24-2018 02:04 PM)ODUsmitty Wrote:  

(06-24-2018 01:47 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(06-24-2018 12:12 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(06-24-2018 12:07 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(06-24-2018 11:26 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  I support strong public accommodations protections for ALL. But if we don't have them, the following rules should apply

1) If you discriminate based upon class, you should clearly state that in ALL advertising. And by discriminate, that includes hiring too. And benefits.

2)If you discriminate you should be banned from ANY taxpayer benefits or subsidies or CONTRACTS. That would include access to admitting rights for discriminatory doctors at any hospital that has any taxpayer funding.

3) If there aren't any providers that will serve a community in EVERY AREA, then the government must provide a FULLY EQUAL (cost and location and service level provision) public option. That means, building hospitals, public schools with offerings equal to voucher private schools for people excluded from those schools, and having the state hire doctors and specialists and staff them everywhere so that discriminated persons don't have to ever wait so much as one second more for service. It would also require either a ban on any doctor accepting ANY insurance plan from discriminating or the state to have a public option insurance plan at the same price as the lowest discriminatory plan rate with the same coverage.

I just want to know who doesn't want my business so I can take it elsewhere. Much easier than lawsuits and forcing them to begrudgingly serve me. I'd rather just give my money to someone who wants my business. If someone can run a business and thrive while openly discriminating against whatever group, more power to them. They should be required to be open about it. Wouldn't you rather a sign on a restaurant that says "gays not welcome" than to unknowingly go in and pay for a meal plus tip to benefit someone that thinks that way but is not allowed to say it?

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

I would rather not be discriminated against. For small minorities, discrimination frequently means a loss of service at the same price and in some cases, it means no service at all.

There isn't enough demand for a LGBT friendly gas station in many areas. What is the state going to put up signs on the freeway stating... No Gas or Restrooms for LGBT people for the next 200 miles?

How would a gas station know you’re gay?

If you come in driving a Prius.

(06-24-2018 02:04 PM)ODUsmitty Wrote:  

(06-24-2018 01:47 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(06-24-2018 12:12 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(06-24-2018 12:07 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(06-24-2018 11:26 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  I support strong public accommodations protections for ALL. But if we don't have them, the following rules should apply

1) If you discriminate based upon class, you should clearly state that in ALL advertising. And by discriminate, that includes hiring too. And benefits.

2)If you discriminate you should be banned from ANY taxpayer benefits or subsidies or CONTRACTS. That would include access to admitting rights for discriminatory doctors at any hospital that has any taxpayer funding.

3) If there aren't any providers that will serve a community in EVERY AREA, then the government must provide a FULLY EQUAL (cost and location and service level provision) public option. That means, building hospitals, public schools with offerings equal to voucher private schools for people excluded from those schools, and having the state hire doctors and specialists and staff them everywhere so that discriminated persons don't have to ever wait so much as one second more for service. It would also require either a ban on any doctor accepting ANY insurance plan from discriminating or the state to have a public option insurance plan at the same price as the lowest discriminatory plan rate with the same coverage.

I just want to know who doesn't want my business so I can take it elsewhere. Much easier than lawsuits and forcing them to begrudgingly serve me. I'd rather just give my money to someone who wants my business. If someone can run a business and thrive while openly discriminating against whatever group, more power to them. They should be required to be open about it. Wouldn't you rather a sign on a restaurant that says "gays not welcome" than to unknowingly go in and pay for a meal plus tip to benefit someone that thinks that way but is not allowed to say it?

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

I would rather not be discriminated against. For small minorities, discrimination frequently means a loss of service at the same price and in some cases, it means no service at all.

There isn't enough demand for a LGBT friendly gas station in many areas. What is the state going to put up signs on the freeway stating... No Gas or Restrooms for LGBT people for the next 200 miles?

How would a gas station know you’re gay?

If you come in driving a Prius.

(06-24-2018 02:42 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  Well Im not surprised. It is the function of progressive thought to shove political choice into every fing aspect of living in this country.

And they scream like stuck pigs when that is used going back against them.

Typical.

(06-25-2018 08:57 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  bwahhahahahahahahahahahahaha

(06-25-2018 09:11 AM)thespiritof1976 Wrote:  

(06-25-2018 08:57 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  bwahhahahahahahahahahahahaha

Trump with ANOTHER walk off FU home run off of liberalism.

(06-24-2018 01:47 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:  How would a gas station know you’re gay?

(06-23-2018 06:59 PM)WKUYG Wrote:  

(06-23-2018 03:22 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  If bakers don't have to bake cakes...

Why dont you try to actually read what the ruling was instead of letting someone else tell you. Tell you incorrectly at that.

Think for yourself and if you are, then stop being a f'ing idiot.

(06-26-2018 03:53 AM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(06-23-2018 06:59 PM)WKUYG Wrote:  

(06-23-2018 03:22 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  If bakers don't have to bake cakes...

Why dont you try to actually read what the ruling was instead of letting someone else tell you. Tell you incorrectly at that.

Think for yourself and if you are, then stop being a f'ing idiot.

Did or did not the SCOTUS rule the baker did not have make the cakes. While it was a very narrow decision in its scope they still ruled that way. Stop being a f’ing hypocrite.

(06-23-2018 09:41 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Relax Sarah.......

They thought you were a lesbian...........

(06-24-2018 12:12 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(06-24-2018 12:07 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(06-24-2018 11:26 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(06-24-2018 10:38 AM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(06-24-2018 10:25 AM)shere khan Wrote:  I like it. Tell me you don't want my money. I will oblige you

I think the law should be to have a sign in the window specifying whose money you don't want: blacks, gays, white men, Trump supporters, pink pusssy hat wearers, people who own Confederate flags, people who own American flags... I want to know. If I knew this place didn't want business from Trump supporters, I would have found somewhere else to eat in Lexington... or kept going to Mrs. Rowe's in Staunton.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

I support strong public accommodations protections for ALL. But if we don't have them, the following rules should apply

1) If you discriminate based upon class, you should clearly state that in ALL advertising. And by discriminate, that includes hiring too. And benefits.

2)If you discriminate you should be banned from ANY taxpayer benefits or subsidies or CONTRACTS. That would include access to admitting rights for discriminatory doctors at any hospital that has any taxpayer funding.

3) If there aren't any providers that will serve a community in EVERY AREA, then the government must provide a FULLY EQUAL (cost and location and service level provision) public option. That means, building hospitals, public schools with offerings equal to voucher private schools for people excluded from those schools, and having the state hire doctors and specialists and staff them everywhere so that discriminated persons don't have to ever wait so much as one second more for service. It would also require either a ban on any doctor accepting ANY insurance plan from discriminating or the state to have a public option insurance plan at the same price as the lowest discriminatory plan rate with the same coverage.

I just want to know who doesn't want my business so I can take it elsewhere. Much easier than lawsuits and forcing them to begrudgingly serve me. I'd rather just give my money to someone who wants my business. If someone can run a business and thrive while openly discriminating against whatever group, more power to them. They should be required to be open about it. Wouldn't you rather a sign on a restaurant that says "gays not welcome" than to unknowingly go in and pay for a meal plus tip to benefit someone that thinks that way but is not allowed to say it?

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

I would rather not be discriminated against. For small minorities, discrimination frequently means a loss of service at the same price and in some cases, it means no service at all.

There isn't enough demand for a LGBT friendly gas station in many areas. What is the state going to put up signs on the freeway stating... No Gas or Restrooms for LGBT people for the next 200 miles?