Quote:Author, columnist, and homosexual activist Dan Savage said the idea that would change the world for the better if implemented is “population control,” and toward that end said “abortion should be mandatory.”

Also note this is the same guy that got the fisting counselor job at University of Oregon.

http://cnsnews.com/news/article/michael-...t-30-years

BTW, the gay code word for hetrosexuals for years was “Breeders” till they were told to cut it out.

"There is no agenda"

Of course this might not work out so well for Savage's favorites

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24132775

Dan Savage is a shock jock...his shtick is gay stuff, which gets him even more attention.

(11-07-2013 04:31 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  BTW, the gay code word for hetrosexuals for years was “Breeders” till they were told to cut it out.

Code word? I thought it was slang, whether for a joke or spite.

(11-07-2013 04:31 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  BTW, the gay code word for hetrosexuals for years was “Breeders” till they were told to cut it out.

Actually, I've heard that mostly used by couples who don't have kids talking about their friends who are now tied down by family and kids.

(11-07-2013 04:32 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  Dan Savage is a shock jock...his shtick is gay stuff, which gets him even more attention.

I wouldn't know.

(11-07-2013 04:53 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  

(11-07-2013 04:32 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  Dan Savage is a shock jock...his shtick is gay stuff, which gets him even more attention.

I wouldn't know.

Google is not difficult to use...

(11-07-2013 04:34 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(11-07-2013 04:31 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  BTW, the gay code word for hetrosexuals for years was “Breeders” till they were told to cut it out.

Actually, I've heard that mostly used by couples who don't have kids talking about their friends who are now tied down by family and kids.

So? You write as if your perception somehow changes the truth of ER's comment.

Actually, you just wrote some non sequitur to make yourself feel relevant

I can think of a better form of population control. Let's abort people like Dan Savage.

Shock jock or not this kind of thing ought to get you run out of town.

Some of you might have forgotten that this is the same jack@ss that bullied and mocked students from a Christian school at an anti-bullying conference. They walked out on him for being a douchebag.

Only libs would put together an anti-bullying conference and invite one of the biggest bullies around to be a keynote speaker. That is like inviting Obama to speak at a conference on ethics and honesty.

(11-07-2013 05:19 PM)DrTorch Wrote:  

(11-07-2013 04:34 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(11-07-2013 04:31 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  BTW, the gay code word for hetrosexuals for years was “Breeders” till they were told to cut it out.

Actually, I've heard that mostly used by couples who don't have kids talking about their friends who are now tied down by family and kids.

So? You write as if your perception somehow changes the truth of ER's comment.

Actually, you just wrote some non sequitur to make yourself feel relevant

And you act as though ER's perception somehow trumps my unequivocal fact.

We already knew gays are damaged.

Dan Savage = Don Imus = mancow = Stern

(11-07-2013 05:45 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  Dan Savage = Don Imus = mancow = Stern

That's a pretty chaotic equation you have there.

bert+ernie=grover

(11-07-2013 05:45 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  Dan Savage = Don Imus = mancow = Stern

Who Obama endorsed at the White House to run an anti-bullying campaign and who turned around and cursed out a bunch teenagers at a conference for walking out on him.

So what your saying is Obama once again showed bad judgement by tapping a shock jock to run a kids program

If the word "hatemonger" applies to anyone on the face of this earth, it applies to Dan Savage.

Does the ACA cover institutionalization? Because that's what Dan Savage needs.

If anything, we should be requiring couples to have more children. I need someone paying into Social Security when I retire in a few decades.

(11-07-2013 07:39 PM)chargeradio Wrote:  I need someone paying into Social Security when I retire in a few decades.

People think Social Security will be around "in a few decades"???

I'm sure there will be something with that name, and some official federal agency in charge of it. But it will not be anything close to what we have grown accustomed to over the past 70 years or so.