Thought I would post this to show which schools are turning out players with degrees and which aren't...

for the record...I will take a 50% rate (or lower) in exchange for conference championships

GSU and USA will not be on the football list since they did not have a team in 2006

It came to my attention that some of the Ivy league fans of the SBC don't know how these NCAA Rates work...right ull fans?

2006 are the up to date NCAA numbers ...to a couple ull fans (they know who they are) that means this is the current numbers for the NCAA. The NCAA will track freshman for 6 years from the time he enrolls and that is the graduation rate

(10-24-2013 01:41 PM)WKUYG Wrote:  It came to my attention that some of the Ivy league fans of the SBC doesn't know how these NCAA Rates work...right ull fans?

2006 are the up to date NCAA numbers ...to a couple ull fans (they know who they are) that means this is the current numbers for the NCAA. The NCAA will track freshman for 6 years from the time he enrolls and that is the graduation rate

They just "doesn't know[!]"

Good edit! You should get credit for being right. So, I'll edit my post so that everybody knows you got it right the second time, which is impressive.

this is the current numbers for the NCAA

Ahem!

http://www.ajc.com/weblogs/georgia-state...ghest-gsr/

http://www.ragincajuns.com/news/2013/10/...33752.aspx

Here you go Mensa Man..... you know who you are.

HAHA!

Z

Considering WKUYG posted his numbers at 12:00 o'clock and those numbers ya'll posted weren't posted to those sites until hours later, WKUYG was correct. They were the latest numbers published until a couple hours later.

Wouldn't those that graduated (at the latest) in Spring 2006 have enrolled in Fall of 2006; if they were 6th year seniors? Ergo, those that enrolled in the Fall of 2006 would have graduated (at the latest) Spring of 2012?

Am I missing something here? 'splain!

(10-24-2013 08:12 PM)WKUApollo Wrote:  Considering WKUYG posted his numbers at 12:00 o'clock and those numbers ya'll posted weren't posted to those sites until hours later, WKUYG was correct. They were the latest numbers published until a couple hours later.

or, we could just say your guy is an arrogant tool?

Thanks,

Z

(10-24-2013 09:21 PM)zeebart21 Wrote:  

(10-24-2013 08:12 PM)WKUApollo Wrote:  Considering WKUYG posted his numbers at 12:00 o'clock and those numbers ya'll posted weren't posted to those sites until hours later, WKUYG was correct. They were the latest numbers published until a couple hours later.

or, we could just say your guy is an arrogant tool?

Thanks,

Z

Stop giving Barry such a hard time...

(10-24-2013 09:21 PM)zeebart21 Wrote:  

(10-24-2013 08:12 PM)WKUApollo Wrote:  Considering WKUYG posted his numbers at 12:00 o'clock and those numbers ya'll posted weren't posted to those sites until hours later, WKUYG was correct. They were the latest numbers published until a couple hours later.

or, we could just say your guy is an arrogant tool?

Thanks,

Z

The irony is blinding.

(10-24-2013 10:43 PM)mathenis89 Wrote:  

(10-24-2013 09:21 PM)zeebart21 Wrote:  

(10-24-2013 08:12 PM)WKUApollo Wrote:  Considering WKUYG posted his numbers at 12:00 o'clock and those numbers ya'll posted weren't posted to those sites until hours later, WKUYG was correct. They were the latest numbers published until a couple hours later.

or, we could just say your guy is an arrogant tool?

Thanks,

Z

The irony is blinding.

WKUYG posts some data. A ULL fan calls him a moron because the posted data from 7 years ago, yet the ULL fan doesn't know that that's the way the numbers work. WKUYG then explains what they are. So WKUYG's the arrogant tool? You're right Mathenis

(10-24-2013 10:53 PM)WKUApollo Wrote:  

(10-24-2013 10:43 PM)mathenis89 Wrote:  

(10-24-2013 09:21 PM)zeebart21 Wrote:  

(10-24-2013 08:12 PM)WKUApollo Wrote:  Considering WKUYG posted his numbers at 12:00 o'clock and those numbers ya'll posted weren't posted to those sites until hours later, WKUYG was correct. They were the latest numbers published until a couple hours later.

or, we could just say your guy is an arrogant tool?

Thanks,

Z

The irony is blinding.

WKUYG posts some data. A ULL fan calls him a moron because the posted data from 7 years ago, yet the ULL fan doesn't know that that's the way the numbers work. WKUYG then explains what they are. So WKUYG's the arrogant tool? You're right Mathenis

Can't tell if last sentence is sarcasm...

(10-24-2013 10:54 PM)mathenis89 Wrote:  

(10-24-2013 10:53 PM)WKUApollo Wrote:  

(10-24-2013 10:43 PM)mathenis89 Wrote:  

(10-24-2013 09:21 PM)zeebart21 Wrote:  

(10-24-2013 08:12 PM)WKUApollo Wrote:  Considering WKUYG posted his numbers at 12:00 o'clock and those numbers ya'll posted weren't posted to those sites until hours later, WKUYG was correct. They were the latest numbers published until a couple hours later.

or, we could just say your guy is an arrogant tool?

Thanks,

Z

The irony is blinding.

WKUYG posts some data. A ULL fan calls him a moron because the posted data from 7 years ago, yet the ULL fan doesn't know that that's the way the numbers work. WKUYG then explains what they are. So WKUYG's the arrogant tool? You're right Mathenis

Can't tell if last sentence is sarcasm...

Not at all. You're correct. The irony is blinding.

(10-24-2013 10:55 PM)WKUApollo Wrote:  

(10-24-2013 10:54 PM)mathenis89 Wrote:  

(10-24-2013 10:53 PM)WKUApollo Wrote:  

(10-24-2013 10:43 PM)mathenis89 Wrote:  

(10-24-2013 09:21 PM)zeebart21 Wrote:  or, we could just say your guy is an arrogant tool?

Thanks,

Z

The irony is blinding.

WKUYG posts some data. A ULL fan calls him a moron because the posted data from 7 years ago, yet the ULL fan doesn't know that that's the way the numbers work. WKUYG then explains what they are. So WKUYG's the arrogant tool? You're right Mathenis

Can't tell if last sentence is sarcasm...

Not at all. You're correct. The irony is blinding.

(10-24-2013 10:53 PM)WKUApollo Wrote:  

(10-24-2013 10:43 PM)mathenis89 Wrote:  

(10-24-2013 09:21 PM)zeebart21 Wrote:  

(10-24-2013 08:12 PM)WKUApollo Wrote:  Considering WKUYG posted his numbers at 12:00 o'clock and those numbers ya'll posted weren't posted to those sites until hours later, WKUYG was correct. They were the latest numbers published until a couple hours later.

or, we could just say your guy is an arrogant tool?

Thanks,

Z

The irony is blinding.

WKUYG posts some data. A ULL fan calls him a moron because the posted data from 7 years ago, yet the ULL fan doesn't know that that's the way the numbers work. WKUYG then explains what they are. So WKUYG's the arrogant tool? You're right Mathenis

UL Fan posts updated/correct numbers that prove said fools numbers to be outdated and incorrect.

Z

(10-24-2013 10:57 PM)zeebart21 Wrote:  

(10-24-2013 10:53 PM)WKUApollo Wrote:  

(10-24-2013 10:43 PM)mathenis89 Wrote:  

(10-24-2013 09:21 PM)zeebart21 Wrote:  

(10-24-2013 08:12 PM)WKUApollo Wrote:  Considering WKUYG posted his numbers at 12:00 o'clock and those numbers ya'll posted weren't posted to those sites until hours later, WKUYG was correct. They were the latest numbers published until a couple hours later.

or, we could just say your guy is an arrogant tool?

Thanks,

Z

The irony is blinding.

WKUYG posts some data. A ULL fan calls him a moron because the posted data from 7 years ago, yet the ULL fan doesn't know that that's the way the numbers work. WKUYG then explains what they are. So WKUYG's the arrogant tool? You're right Mathenis

UL Fan posts updated/correct numbers that prove said fools numbers to be outdated and incorrect.

Z

UL fan posts updated data that came out after WKUYG's data. When WKUYG posted his data, it was current. Regardless, that's not the real issue here. Two UL fans took pleasure in calling WKUYG a moron for posting the 2006 graduation data. The UL fans had to be schooled on how that data is released. They were arrogant in calling him a moron and then were shot down.

(10-24-2013 11:00 PM)WKUApollo Wrote:  

(10-24-2013 10:57 PM)zeebart21 Wrote:  

(10-24-2013 10:53 PM)WKUApollo Wrote:  

(10-24-2013 10:43 PM)mathenis89 Wrote:  

(10-24-2013 09:21 PM)zeebart21 Wrote:  or, we could just say your guy is an arrogant tool?

Thanks,

Z

The irony is blinding.

WKUYG posts some data. A ULL fan calls him a moron because the posted data from 7 years ago, yet the ULL fan doesn't know that that's the way the numbers work. WKUYG then explains what they are. So WKUYG's the arrogant tool? You're right Mathenis

UL Fan posts updated/correct numbers that prove said fools numbers to be outdated and incorrect.

Z

UL fan posts updated data that came out after WKUYG's data. When WKUYG posted his data, it was current. Regardless, that's not the real issue here. Two UL fans took pleasure in calling WKUYG a moron for posting the 2006 graduation data. The UL fans had to be schooled on how that data is released. They were arrogant in calling him a moron and then were shot down.

If my memory serves, sir.. i asked him to post something from this decade. He couldnt. Low and behold, I did. Coincidence? I think not.

Z

(10-24-2013 11:10 PM)zeebart21 Wrote:  

(10-24-2013 11:00 PM)WKUApollo Wrote:  

(10-24-2013 10:57 PM)zeebart21 Wrote:  

(10-24-2013 10:53 PM)WKUApollo Wrote:  

(10-24-2013 10:43 PM)mathenis89 Wrote:  The irony is blinding.

WKUYG posts some data. A ULL fan calls him a moron because the posted data from 7 years ago, yet the ULL fan doesn't know that that's the way the numbers work. WKUYG then explains what they are. So WKUYG's the arrogant tool? You're right Mathenis

UL Fan posts updated/correct numbers that prove said fools numbers to be outdated and incorrect.

Z

UL fan posts updated data that came out after WKUYG's data. When WKUYG posted his data, it was current. Regardless, that's not the real issue here. Two UL fans took pleasure in calling WKUYG a moron for posting the 2006 graduation data. The UL fans had to be schooled on how that data is released. They were arrogant in calling him a moron and then were shot down.

If my memory serves, sir.. i asked him to post something from this decade. He couldnt. Low and behold, I did. Coincidence? I think not.

Z

You must have graduated with some sort of fine arts degree. Thus, your ignorance for how facts and figures are released is understandable.

(10-24-2013 11:10 PM)zeebart21 Wrote:  If my memory serves, sir.. i asked him to post something from this decade. He couldnt. Low and behold, I did. Coincidence? I think not.

Z

You evidently are still confused. WKUYG showed the 2005-6 data. TODAY, the NCAA released the 2006-7 data, which you shared. That data was released after WKUYG posted his data. Here's the quote from the article you shared (did you not read it?)

Louisiana Ragin' Cajuns student-athletes graduate at the highest rate among student-athletes in schools in both the state of Louisiana and the Sun Belt Conference, according to the Federal Graduation Rates (FGR) statistics, which were released by the NCAA on Thursday (Oct. 24).

The statistics include student-athletes on aid entering school during the 2006-07 academic year, and it indicates the percentage of those who graduate within six years.