Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
Expansion may not be over for CUSA
Author Message
BamaScorpio69 Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 11,602
Joined: Oct 2010
Reputation: 149
I Root For: Non-AQs
Location:
Post: #61
RE: Expansion may not be over for CUSA
All this thread is accomplishing is:

1. Inviting idoitic expansion chat
2. A chance for ECU posters to stir the pot
07-12-2013 08:42 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Atbjmu09 Offline
Water Engineer
*

Posts: 82
Joined: May 2013
Reputation: 6
I Root For: JMU
Location:
Post: #62
RE: Expansion may not be over for CUSA
(07-12-2013 07:20 PM)Chappy Wrote:  Arkansas State and Louisiana Lafayette are miles ahead of any FCS schools. There just aren't any other ODUs out there, as much as JMU may think they are.

C-USA will get a taste of what a 16 team league is like this basketball season. Maybe they'll want to pursue 16 again down the road if they like how it works.

There is very little difference between lower level FBS and upper level FCS. Look at the facilities and attendance figures of schools like App State and JMU and compare them to everyone in CUSA/MAC/Sun Belt. They are near top for every conference and we also play against very small time programs. I think some posters on here are very quick to forget their school's FCS roots.

We are no ODU. You are correct about that, but they are no JMU either. In Virginia, the most applied to schools in the state are JMU, VA Tech, and UVA. The reason for their popularity is because they have the total package when it comes to academics, athletics, and overall college atmosphere. So, yes ODU has a lot of upside and potential, but there is stuff we can offer prospective conferences that they cannot.
07-12-2013 08:47 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
techdawg88 Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 7,118
Joined: Jun 2008
Reputation: 110
I Root For: Louisiana Tech
Location:
Post: #63
RE: Expansion may not be over for CUSA
(07-12-2013 08:47 PM)Atbjmu09 Wrote:  
(07-12-2013 07:20 PM)Chappy Wrote:  Arkansas State and Louisiana Lafayette are miles ahead of any FCS schools. There just aren't any other ODUs out there, as much as JMU may think they are.

C-USA will get a taste of what a 16 team league is like this basketball season. Maybe they'll want to pursue 16 again down the road if they like how it works.

There is very little difference between lower level FBS and upper level FCS. Look at the facilities and attendance figures of schools like App State and JMU and compare them to everyone in CUSA/MAC/Sun Belt. They are near top for every conference and we also play against very small time programs. I think some posters on here are very quick to forget their school's FCS roots.

We are no ODU. You are correct about that, but they are no JMU either. In Virginia, the most applied to schools in the state are JMU, VA Tech, and UVA. The reason for their popularity is because they have the total package when it comes to academics, athletics, and overall college atmosphere. So, yes ODU has a lot of upside and potential, but there is stuff we can offer prospective conferences that they cannot.

CUSA isn't interested in going past 14 at this time
07-12-2013 08:52 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
GSU Eagles Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 5,010
Joined: Aug 2009
Reputation: 76
I Root For: GeorgiaSouthern
Location:
Post: #64
RE: Expansion may not be over for CUSA
If CUSA lost 2, what are the odds they stay at 12 given the payouts are capped at 12 teams?
I would think that odds are in favor of staying at 12 given the payout issue and lack of market programs available. That is likely why CUSA backed off on 16 which at one time they were going to do.
(This post was last modified: 07-12-2013 09:15 PM by GSU Eagles.)
07-12-2013 09:13 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
techdawg88 Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 7,118
Joined: Jun 2008
Reputation: 110
I Root For: Louisiana Tech
Location:
Post: #65
RE: Expansion may not be over for CUSA
(07-12-2013 09:13 PM)GSU Eagles Wrote:  If CUSA lost 2, what are the odds they stay at 12 given the payouts are capped at 12 teams?
I would think that odds are in favor of staying at 12 given the payout issue and lack of market programs available. That is likely why CUSA backed off on 16 which at one time they were going to do.

maybe 10%
07-12-2013 09:16 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
gulfcoastgal Offline
All American
*

Posts: 4,299
Joined: Feb 2007
Reputation: 400
I Root For: Memphis Tigers
Location:
Post: #66
RE: Expansion may not be over for CUSA
No idea about CUSA's future plans, but maybe the Commish offers some insight: ODUBLitz.COM

Quote:Banowsky has a laissez-faire philosophy toward schools leaving his conference.

"We approach things a little differently than other conferences," he said. "We expect our members to be a part of the team while they're here. We expect them to be open with us and to follow the rules.

"But if universities feel like it's in their best interest to re-associate somewhere else, we generally pat them on the back and thank them for their contributions to the league."
07-12-2013 09:19 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
AtlantaEagle Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,024
Joined: Dec 2003
Reputation: 47
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #67
RE: Expansion may not be over for CUSA
(07-12-2013 08:52 PM)techdawg88 Wrote:  CUSA isn't interested in going past 14 at this time
Yes, but Banowsky would love to. Been trying for years, but fortunately has been turned back by the AD's & Presidents in prior attempts.
The article actually sounds like conjecture by the writer as he's going over several scenarios.
Personally, I'd rather C-USA stopped at 12 members, 16 is way too many.
07-12-2013 09:21 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
ODUalum78 Online
Overseer of the Unwashed Masses
*

Posts: 9,371
Joined: May 2012
Reputation: 158
I Root For: ODU
Location: Chesterfield, Va

Lion's Den Poster of the Year
Post: #68
RE: Expansion may not be over for CUSA
(07-12-2013 08:52 PM)techdawg88 Wrote:  CUSA isn't interested in going past 14 at this time
Truth
Conference USA presidents met in Dallas in June and decided no expansion.

Quote:But C-USA presidents decided not to pursue a 16-team model for the foreseeable future as CBSSports.com first reported Tuesday. This closes the door on small-conference moves and probably limits the number of FCS schools transitioning into the College Football Playoff revenue pie.
http://www.cbssports.com/collegefootball...sion-pause

Done.
07-coffee3
(This post was last modified: 07-12-2013 09:28 PM by ODUalum78.)
07-12-2013 09:22 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
SATXBOSSMAN Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 541
Joined: Apr 2012
Reputation: 23
I Root For: UTSA
Location: San Antonio
Post: #69
RE: Expansion may not be over for CUSA
Expansion? Really? Football season needs to start already!
07-12-2013 09:31 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
ODUalum78 Online
Overseer of the Unwashed Masses
*

Posts: 9,371
Joined: May 2012
Reputation: 158
I Root For: ODU
Location: Chesterfield, Va

Lion's Den Poster of the Year
Post: #70
RE: Expansion may not be over for CUSA
(07-12-2013 08:47 PM)Atbjmu09 Wrote:  
(07-12-2013 07:20 PM)Chappy Wrote:  Arkansas State and Louisiana Lafayette are miles ahead of any FCS schools. There just aren't any other ODUs out there, as much as JMU may think they are.

C-USA will get a taste of what a 16 team league is like this basketball season. Maybe they'll want to pursue 16 again down the road if they like how it works.

There is very little difference between lower level FBS and upper level FCS. Look at the facilities and attendance figures of schools like App State and JMU and compare them to everyone in CUSA/MAC/Sun Belt. They are near top for every conference and we also play against very small time programs. I think some posters on here are very quick to forget their school's FCS roots.

We are no ODU. You are correct about that, but they are no JMU either. In Virginia, the most applied to schools in the state are JMU, VA Tech, and UVA. The reason for their popularity is because they have the total package when it comes to academics, athletics, and overall college atmosphere. So, yes ODU has a lot of upside and potential, but there is stuff we can offer prospective conferences that they cannot.

And yet here we are. 03-nutkick
07-12-2013 09:34 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
techdawg88 Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 7,118
Joined: Jun 2008
Reputation: 110
I Root For: Louisiana Tech
Location:
Post: #71
RE: Expansion may not be over for CUSA
(07-12-2013 09:21 PM)AtlantaEagle Wrote:  
(07-12-2013 08:52 PM)techdawg88 Wrote:  CUSA isn't interested in going past 14 at this time
Yes, but Banowsky would love to. Been trying for years, but fortunately has been turned back by the AD's & Presidents in prior attempts.
The article actually sounds like conjecture by the writer as he's going over several scenarios.
Personally, I'd rather C-USA stopped at 12 members, 16 is way too many.

like you said Banowsky may want to go to 16, but it's really not his decision
07-12-2013 09:38 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
MTRV Offline
Water Engineer
*

Posts: 32
Joined: Jul 2013
Reputation: 6
I Root For: Middle Tennesse
Location:
Post: #72
RE: Expansion may not be over for CUSA
well said techdawg
07-12-2013 09:41 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
GSU Eagles Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 5,010
Joined: Aug 2009
Reputation: 76
I Root For: GeorgiaSouthern
Location:
Post: #73
RE: Expansion may not be over for CUSA
Banowsky would go to 20 if he could. Gives him a bigger empire to run and more $$$. This was especially true when the belief was that adding more teams meant more payout revenue, but that all changed when the cap at 12 was announced. It is now hard to justify going above 12 for the G5 conferences, especially if we are entering a period of stability and you don't have to hedge against losing more programs.
(This post was last modified: 07-12-2013 10:59 PM by GSU Eagles.)
07-12-2013 10:20 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Fear The Beak Offline
2nd String
*

Posts: 466
Joined: Apr 2012
Reputation: 28
I Root For: UTSA
Location: San Antonio
Post: #74
RE: Expansion may not be over for CUSA
(07-12-2013 10:20 PM)GSU Eagles Wrote:  Banowsky would go to 20 if he could. Gives him a bigger empire to run and more $$$. This was especially true when the belief was that adding more teams mean more payout revenue, but that all changed when the cap at 12 was announced. It is now hard to justify going above 12 for the G5 conferences, especially if we are entering a period of stability and you don't have to hedge against losing more programs.

I agree, I think 12 is the perfect size for football anyway. 5 division games and 3 against the other division. Play every team in other division two out of every 4 years.
07-12-2013 10:45 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
GreenBison Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 7,195
Joined: Jun 2002
Reputation: 538
I Root For: Marshall | SBC
Location: West By God!
Post: #75
RE: Expansion may not be over for CUSA
(07-12-2013 08:47 PM)Atbjmu09 Wrote:  
(07-12-2013 07:20 PM)Chappy Wrote:  Arkansas State and Louisiana Lafayette are miles ahead of any FCS schools. There just aren't any other ODUs out there, as much as JMU may think they are.

C-USA will get a taste of what a 16 team league is like this basketball season. Maybe they'll want to pursue 16 again down the road if they like how it works.

There is very little difference between lower level FBS and upper level FCS. Look at the facilities and attendance figures of schools like App State and JMU and compare them to everyone in CUSA/MAC/Sun Belt. They are near top for every conference and we also play against very small time programs. I think some posters on here are very quick to forget their school's FCS roots.

We are no ODU. You are correct about that, but they are no JMU either. In Virginia, the most applied to schools in the state are JMU, VA Tech, and UVA. The reason for their popularity is because they have the total package when it comes to academics, athletics, and overall college atmosphere. So, yes ODU has a lot of upside and potential, but there is stuff we can offer prospective conferences that they cannot.

Fun fact... Marshall University is an older Virginia school than ODU and JMU.
07-12-2013 11:09 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
ODUalum78 Online
Overseer of the Unwashed Masses
*

Posts: 9,371
Joined: May 2012
Reputation: 158
I Root For: ODU
Location: Chesterfield, Va

Lion's Den Poster of the Year
Post: #76
RE: Expansion may not be over for CUSA
(07-12-2013 11:09 PM)GreenBison Wrote:  
(07-12-2013 08:47 PM)Atbjmu09 Wrote:  
(07-12-2013 07:20 PM)Chappy Wrote:  Arkansas State and Louisiana Lafayette are miles ahead of any FCS schools. There just aren't any other ODUs out there, as much as JMU may think they are.

C-USA will get a taste of what a 16 team league is like this basketball season. Maybe they'll want to pursue 16 again down the road if they like how it works.

There is very little difference between lower level FBS and upper level FCS. Look at the facilities and attendance figures of schools like App State and JMU and compare them to everyone in CUSA/MAC/Sun Belt. They are near top for every conference and we also play against very small time programs. I think some posters on here are very quick to forget their school's FCS roots.

We are no ODU. You are correct about that, but they are no JMU either. In Virginia, the most applied to schools in the state are JMU, VA Tech, and UVA. The reason for their popularity is because they have the total package when it comes to academics, athletics, and overall college atmosphere. So, yes ODU has a lot of upside and potential, but there is stuff we can offer prospective conferences that they cannot.

Fun fact... Marshall University is an older Virginia school than ODU and JMU.
That's absolutely correct!
Marshall was founded in the 1830s; well before the secession of West Virginia. 03-nutkick
07-12-2013 11:13 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
stanman505 Offline
All American
*

Posts: 2,628
Joined: Mar 2005
Reputation: 108
I Root For: UTEP
Location:
Post: #77
RE: Expansion may not be over for CUSA
The reason UTEP did not accept the MWC was:
1. We thought SMU, Houston and Tulsa would stay in CUSA
2. We didn't think SDSU and Boise St. would return to MWC

The key is BYU. BYU has been offered a deal similar to that of Boise St. Any BSU football game not picked up by the ESPN and CBS sports contracts can be sold on the open market and BSU gets all the money for it. The other thing that is playing on BYU is how well it will do obtaining a bowl spot as an independent. On the basketball side BYU would like to be in the MWC. The MWC is a power when it comes to basketball, they had five teams in the NCAA last season. They did not like the fact that they didn't get an at large NCAA bid with a 21-11 record and rpi of 63. The MWC is also looking at how CUSA will handle a football schedule with 14 teams this season. If BYU football doesn't get a good bowl this year then look for them and UTEP to go the MWC. The announcement would come after the CUSA basketball tournament in El Paso and would take effect after the 2014-2015 season, which would put UTEP in the same position as ECU, Tulsa and Tulane this season.
07-13-2013 12:17 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
BamaScorpio69 Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 11,602
Joined: Oct 2010
Reputation: 149
I Root For: Non-AQs
Location:
Post: #78
RE: Expansion may not be over for CUSA
Stan pass me whatever you are smoking. 21-11 with a 63 RPI would not get you in the Dance even if BYU played in the Big Ten or ACC.
07-13-2013 12:32 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
CPslograd Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 517
Joined: May 2012
Reputation: 7
I Root For: Fresno State
Location:
Post: #79
RE: Expansion may not be over for CUSA
(07-13-2013 12:17 AM)stanman505 Wrote:  The reason UTEP did not accept the MWC was:
1. We thought SMU, Houston and Tulsa would stay in CUSA
2. We didn't think SDSU and Boise St. would return to MWC

The key is BYU. BYU has been offered a deal similar to that of Boise St. Any BSU football game not picked up by the ESPN and CBS sports contracts can be sold on the open market and BSU gets all the money for it. The other thing that is playing on BYU is how well it will do obtaining a bowl spot as an independent. On the basketball side BYU would like to be in the MWC. The MWC is a power when it comes to basketball, they had five teams in the NCAA last season. They did not like the fact that they didn't get an at large NCAA bid with a 21-11 record and rpi of 63. The MWC is also looking at how CUSA will handle a football schedule with 14 teams this season. If BYU football doesn't get a good bowl this year then look for them and UTEP to go the MWC. The announcement would come after the CUSA basketball tournament in El Paso and would take effect after the 2014-2015 season, which would put UTEP in the same position as ECU, Tulsa and Tulane this season.

The MWC tv/distribution deal is a travshamockery, but your description of it is pretty much completely wrong. The sham system the MWC has devised might allow BYU to be equally compensated to what it is making now if ESPN decided it wanted BYU in the MWC, but BYU isn't joining the MWC because Utah is in a P5 league as well as other reasons.

Boise would probably like 14 because they could go to the West. But the money isn't going to be there and no one is going to vote themselves another paycut. The Western schools would probably want Hawaii in as a full voting member if MST or CST teams were added in order to balance votes. And the hobocheap Rockies schools don't seem interested in flying to Hawaii.

Utep doesn't get you into the Texas market anyway. It just doubles the MWC presence in the ABQ/El Paso area. No bueno. I don't see it happening.
(This post was last modified: 07-13-2013 03:45 AM by CPslograd.)
07-13-2013 03:44 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
RustonCAT Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,231
Joined: Oct 2011
Reputation: -28
I Root For: stAte/Latech
Location:
Post: #80
RE: Expansion may not be over for CUSA
(07-12-2013 08:47 PM)Atbjmu09 Wrote:  
(07-12-2013 07:20 PM)Chappy Wrote:  Arkansas State and Louisiana Lafayette are miles ahead of any FCS schools. There just aren't any other ODUs out there, as much as JMU may think they are.

C-USA will get a taste of what a 16 team league is like this basketball season. Maybe they'll want to pursue 16 again down the road if they like how it works.

There is very little difference between lower level FBS and upper level FCS. Look at the facilities and attendance figures of schools like App State and JMU and compare them to everyone in CUSA/MAC/Sun Belt. They are near top for every conference and we also play against very small time programs. I think some posters on here are very quick to forget their school's FCS roots.

We are no ODU. You are correct about that, but they are no JMU either. In Virginia, the most applied to schools in the state are JMU, VA Tech, and UVA. The reason for their popularity is because they have the total package when it comes to academics, athletics, and overall college atmosphere. So, yes ODU has a lot of upside and potential, but there is stuff we can offer prospective conferences that they cannot.

One problem both Arkansas state and Louisiana are no where near bottom FBS anymore. So adding Theses 2 teams would add to the top of CUSA not the bottom hopefuls like JMU
(This post was last modified: 07-13-2013 06:30 AM by RustonCAT.)
07-13-2013 06:29 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.