(02-08-2013 10:15 AM)Razor Ramon Monarch Wrote:  First of all, you questioned the numbers, they are right there to do for you unless you are incapable of easy 2nd grade math.

Read the article , find the numbers for yourself and do the math. What you showed earlier, is wrong.

F is for fail. Try again son. Next time use your little brain and see if it can just barely manage to fart out an answer from that poo factory that is your skull. We believe in you. You've certainly showed you can count two for although none of us, including most all if you, has no idea why we should have lol.

So, I pose a harmless question to try and explain why this hugely excessive order might just be something it isn't, and you deride me for intelligence, but do so with that incoherent mess? Wow!

So we should leave our protection up to these morons?

(02-08-2013 08:13 AM)ImMoreAwesomeThanYou Wrote:  I also believe they're hollow point cartridges that have been banned in international warfare. So what do they need with ammunition they can't use outside the USA? Especially that much.

BY READING THIS POST YOU RECOGNIZE THAT IMATY IS THE LAST GREAT CRUSADER FOR TRUTH AND JUSTICE SO HELP YOU GOD.

THey are coming to get you too.

It is probably part of the plan to keep the Confederate states in line.

(02-08-2013 10:59 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(02-08-2013 10:15 AM)Razor Ramon Monarch Wrote:  First of all, you questioned the numbers, they are right there to do for you unless you are incapable of easy 2nd grade math.

Read the article , find the numbers for yourself and do the math. What you showed earlier, is wrong.

F is for fail. Try again son. Next time use your little brain and see if it can just barely manage to fart out an answer from that poo factory that is your skull. We believe in you. You've certainly showed you can count two for although none of us, including most all if you, has no idea why we should have lol.

So, I pose a harmless question to try and explain why this hugely excessive order might just be something it isn't, and you deride me for intelligence, but do so with that incoherent mess? Wow!

In a society that Obama is trying to disarm, why would the government agency need to arm up? Who might they be protecting themselves from if none of us have similar weapons?

(02-08-2013 12:07 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  

(02-08-2013 10:59 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(02-08-2013 10:15 AM)Razor Ramon Monarch Wrote:  First of all, you questioned the numbers, they are right there to do for you unless you are incapable of easy 2nd grade math.

Read the article , find the numbers for yourself and do the math. What you showed earlier, is wrong.

F is for fail. Try again son. Next time use your little brain and see if it can just barely manage to fart out an answer from that poo factory that is your skull. We believe in you. You've certainly showed you can count two for although none of us, including most all if you, has no idea why we should have lol.

So, I pose a harmless question to try and explain why this hugely excessive order might just be something it isn't, and you deride me for intelligence, but do so with that incoherent mess? Wow!

In a society that Obama is trying to disarm, why would the government agency need to arm up? Who might they be protecting themselves from if none of us have similar weapons?

I tell you it is to keep the Confederate states from seceding. Personally, I think they should just let them go but that is just me.

Yes! More conspiracy theories! The government is going to get you!

:patriot:

(02-08-2013 12:20 PM)MidnightBlueGold Wrote:  Yes! More conspiracy theories! The government is going to get you!

:patriot:

Aren't these guys entertaining? THat is why I post here. THis board is more entertaining than most shows on TV.

If drones in our skies, a billion rounds of ammunition, an incredibly divisive President, and our march towards a complete nanny state don't at least make you scratch your head then please speculate as to what you think is going on. Inquiring minds want to know.

BY READING THIS POST YOU RECOGNIZE THAT IMATY IS THE LAST GREAT CRUSADER FOR TRUTH AND JUSTICE SO HELP YOU GOD.

(02-08-2013 12:23 PM)RobertN Wrote:  

(02-08-2013 12:20 PM)MidnightBlueGold Wrote:  Yes! More conspiracy theories! The government is going to get you!

:patriot:

Aren't these guys entertaining? THat is why I post here. THis board is more entertaining than most shows on TV.

I know! I come here for a good laugh.

(02-08-2013 12:30 PM)ImMoreAwesomeThanYou Wrote:  If drones in our skies, a billion rounds of ammunition, an incredibly divisive President, and our march towards a complete nanny state don't at least make you scratch your head then please speculate as to what you think is going on. Inquiring minds want to know.

And in four years we'll have a new President and you'll still look like a total moron.

Next!

(02-08-2013 12:07 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  

(02-08-2013 10:59 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(02-08-2013 10:15 AM)Razor Ramon Monarch Wrote:  First of all, you questioned the numbers, they are right there to do for you unless you are incapable of easy 2nd grade math.

Read the article , find the numbers for yourself and do the math. What you showed earlier, is wrong.

F is for fail. Try again son. Next time use your little brain and see if it can just barely manage to fart out an answer from that poo factory that is your skull. We believe in you. You've certainly showed you can count two for although none of us, including most all if you, has no idea why we should have lol.

So, I pose a harmless question to try and explain why this hugely excessive order might just be something it isn't, and you deride me for intelligence, but do so with that incoherent mess? Wow!

In a society that Obama is trying to disarm, why would the government agency need to arm up? Who might they be protecting themselves from if none of us have similar weapons?

Totally miss the facts of the current situation much?

(02-08-2013 12:56 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(02-08-2013 12:30 PM)ImMoreAwesomeThanYou Wrote:  If drones in our skies, a billion rounds of ammunition, an incredibly divisive President, and our march towards a complete nanny state don't at least make you scratch your head then please speculate as to what you think is going on. Inquiring minds want to know.

And in four years we'll have a new President and you'll still look like a total moron.

Next!

Was that an answer? In four years if the same chit is happening I'll be railing about that too. I'm not an apologist like you.

BY READING THIS POST YOU RECOGNIZE THAT IMATY IS THE LAST GREAT CRUSADER FOR TRUTH AND JUSTICE SO HELP YOU GOD.

I don't apologize for a damned thing. I'm not the one with a totally ignorant view of what is actually happening. You're the one who is now on the wrong side of nearly every issue in America...but don't change...that'll just guarantee Hillary in 2016 and Corey Booker in 2024. Maybe by 2032 the 'new' Republican Party might get to be President.

(02-08-2013 12:59 PM)RobertN Wrote:  

(02-08-2013 12:54 PM)ImMoreAwesomeThanYou Wrote:  Wow...wrong again. The Bible is more than 99.99% accurate when compared to the oldest surviving texts. This isn't even up for debate. Even most atheists acknowledge the historical accuracy and significance of the Bible.

BY READING THIS POST YOU RECOGNIZE THAT IMATY IS THE LAST GREAT CRUSADER FOR TRUTH AND JUSTICE SO HELP YOU GOD.

Thump that Bible IMATY!

Yes, you do make excuses for lord zero. Is there anything your beloved government could do that would concern you? I don't have to try that hard when I imagine your outrage if this were Bush.

BY READING THIS POST YOU RECOGNIZE THAT IMATY IS THE LAST GREAT CRUSADER FOR TRUTH AND JUSTICE SO HELP YOU GOD.

Wow...it posted a reply from another thread. My bad. On my phone.

BY READING THIS POST YOU RECOGNIZE THAT IMATY IS THE LAST GREAT CRUSADER FOR TRUTH AND JUSTICE SO HELP YOU GOD.

(02-08-2013 01:17 PM)ImMoreAwesomeThanYou Wrote:  Wow...it posted a reply from another thread. My bad. On my phone.

You should be able to delete the post.

(02-08-2013 12:56 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(02-08-2013 12:07 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  

(02-08-2013 10:59 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(02-08-2013 10:15 AM)Razor Ramon Monarch Wrote:  First of all, you questioned the numbers, they are right there to do for you unless you are incapable of easy 2nd grade math.

Read the article , find the numbers for yourself and do the math. What you showed earlier, is wrong.

F is for fail. Try again son. Next time use your little brain and see if it can just barely manage to fart out an answer from that poo factory that is your skull. We believe in you. You've certainly showed you can count two for although none of us, including most all if you, has no idea why we should have lol.

So, I pose a harmless question to try and explain why this hugely excessive order might just be something it isn't, and you deride me for intelligence, but do so with that incoherent mess? Wow!

In a society that Obama is trying to disarm, why would the government agency need to arm up? Who might they be protecting themselves from if none of us have similar weapons?

Totally miss the facts of the current situation much?

In a round about way, you wouldn't be implying Obama is pro gun? Water pistols don't count.

Depends by what you mean by pro-gun.

Until Aurora and Sandy Hook, Obama had actually expanded gun rights in the USA, and the topic of an assault weapons ban wasn't even really on the radar.

Obama also has no intention of getting rid of the second amendment.

Now, is he an avid hunter and a once a week skeet shooter? Hardly.

Maybe this is like the old government cheese program. Each ultra liberal progressive socialist, not on his kill list, will be given 5,000,000 rounds of hollow point bullets to take them into the next phase of world government, with a DVD copy of his expanded kill list.

(02-08-2013 02:07 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Depends by what you mean by pro-gun.

Until Aurora and Sandy Hook, Obama had actually expanded gun rights in the USA, and the topic of an assault weapons ban wasn't even really on the radar.

Obama also has no intention of getting rid of the second amendment.

Now, is he an avid hunter and a once a week skeet shooter? Hardly.

I think it's funny that all the pro-gun people think that needing to pass a background check and having limits on the magazine size is taking away their right to own guns. Because having background checks and magazine size limits is means that no one will be able to buy guns anymore.