(11-06-2012 10:43 PM)DaSaintFan Wrote:  

(11-06-2012 10:37 PM)Rebel Wrote:  

(11-06-2012 10:34 PM)49RFootballNow Wrote:  I'm happy Congress is deadlocked. If they'll actually watch the POTUS like a hawk we'll make it through the next 4 years with America barely hanging on, BUT HANGING ON!

Dafuq does it matter when you have a Despot signing executive orders circumventing Congress?

If these numbers hold, you think Issa's going to hold back now on the Benghazi investigations and the F&F investigations?

not a chance

Religious nutjobs???? Catering to those who believe in God is not the reason if Repubs lose. The reason the repubs will probably lose is because they did not want to go after the African-American vote or the Spanish speaking vote. Both of those, especially in VA could be for the taking. My roommate hates Obama, but he traditionally votes Democrat.

Latest Miami-Dade results have Obama up another percentage point to 62.26% of the vote.

VA is so close it is scary. Something like 20,000 votes separate and about 85% of the vote in. Kaine has also pulled ahead and is leading by 40,000 votes, but Romney is leading by 20,000.

wow..just looking at the Ohio map, and was talking with one of my coworkers... but its' 5 counties (at the moment) that have an Obama edge total... Everything else is still undecided (athough a few lean Obama) or Romney. So if you ever go campaigning in Ohio, just worry about the three cities and forget everyone else apparently?

(11-06-2012 10:50 PM)jmufan Wrote:  VA is so close it is scary. Something like 20,000 votes separate.

VA = 29000 difference (87%)
FL = 32000 difference (92.6%)

(11-06-2012 10:50 PM)DaSaintFan Wrote:  wow..just looking at the Ohio map, and was talking with one of my coworkers... but its' 5 counties (at the moment) that have an Obama edge total... Everything else is still undecided (athough a few lean Obama) or Romney. So if you ever go campaigning in Ohio, just worry about the three cities and forget everyone else apparently?

Thats what the nation will look like if you get rid of the EC..

Megyn Kelly is a stuck up, egotistical snob.

Romney is actually winning the popular vote, but the overall popular vote doesn't matter so I laugh at the national news. The only popular vote that counts is the one within your own state.

NC called for Romney. By 3 points like I said.

(11-06-2012 10:55 PM)Bull_In_Exile Wrote:  

(11-06-2012 10:50 PM)DaSaintFan Wrote:  wow..just looking at the Ohio map, and was talking with one of my coworkers... but its' 5 counties (at the moment) that have an Obama edge total... Everything else is still undecided (athough a few lean Obama) or Romney. So if you ever go campaigning in Ohio, just worry about the three cities and forget everyone else apparently?

Thats what the nation will look like if you get rid of the EC..

Oh, i know Bull. that's why I've never been in favor of doing away with the EC...

I'm pretty sure now that Obama is going to win. Romney would have to have a miracle. With the states Obama's won already, he's got 246 including the likely Obama states of Oregon, Washington, and California. Iowa and Colorado are looking like Obama states too - so that brings it up to 261. Four from Hawaii makes it 265. Ohio is about a 100k Obama lead, so chances are he'll win there. That would give him enough - pushing his total to 283. Winning Nevada would give him 271. And winning Florida would give him 294. Obama has another term, unless there's a magical comeback for Romney.

Hey Republicans. Wan't to win an election? Nominate someone worth a **** that can MOTIVATE people. If you can't beat the "worst president ever", that's pretty sad.

It's like people were in a coma the last four years.

Obama will definitely win. It would be fun to see if and when no clear winner is noted by the EC and it would have to go the congress for decision.

You've got an interesting idea of "fun".

(11-06-2012 11:06 PM)ETSUfan1 Wrote:  Hey Republicans. Wan't to win an election? Nominate someone worth a **** that can MOTIVATE people. If you can't beat the "worst president ever", that's pretty sad.

Yeah, Romney wasn't a good candidate. Paul would have been better than Romney.

(11-06-2012 11:08 PM)Smaug Wrote:  You've got an interesting idea of "fun".

It would be very intriguing to watch, that is all.

(11-06-2012 11:06 PM)ETSUfan1 Wrote:  Hey Republicans. Wan't to win an election? Nominate someone worth a **** that can MOTIVATE people. If you can't beat the "worst president ever", that's pretty sad.

Yes...Mittens was a horrible candidate. I have felt all along that they ran the wrong Mormon. Huntsman would have given Obama fits.

(11-06-2012 11:06 PM)ETSUfan1 Wrote:  Hey Republicans. Wan't to win an election? Nominate someone worth a **** that can MOTIVATE people. If you can't beat the "worst president ever", that's pretty sad.

Going by your standards we should vote for hitler. Voting for the best liar is not the way to pick a president