Obama doesn't have the guts to respond to terrorists!

Protesters torch KFC in Tripoli, Lebanon

Demonstrators in Tripoli, Lebanon, burned down a restaurant belonging to US-based chain KFC in protest against an anti-Islamic film mocking the Prophet Muhammad. At least one person was killed and 24 were wounded in the clashes with police.

Following Friday prayers, hundreds of demonstrators massed in protest against the Pope's three-day visit to Lebanon and shouted anti-American slogans.

The chants included "We don't want the Pope," and "No more insults [to Islam]," witnesses reported.

Security forces fired warning shots into the air in an attempt to disperse the protesters, who marched from Tripoli’s Al-Mansouri Mosque to nearby Nour Square.

Another 300 protesters marched a half-kilometer down the road and attacked an American fast-food chain, setting the building on fire. The restaurant’s employees were evacuated.

http://rt.com/news/kfc-tripoli-lebanon-fire-140/

But KFC kills their chicken under Sharia Law!

PLEASING THE ISLAMIC FAITH - KFC (Houston) using animals slaughtered under Sharia Law
KTRH ^ | Nik Rajkovic

KFCs in Houston are now serving meat slaughtered under Sharia Law. The practice of Halal is said to be a much slower, calmer process which begins with a prayer for the animal.

Some say this discriminates against non-Muslims. But Paul Shapiro, Vice President for Farm Animal Protection at the Humane Society of the U.S. simply calls it inhumane.

"Animals have their throats cut without being rendered unconscious prior to the cutting," says Shapiro. "That's unlike other types of more conventional slaughter where an effort is supposed to be made to render the animals insensible to pain."

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2929927/posts

(09-14-2012 10:43 AM)WMD Owl Wrote:  The chants included "We don't want the Pope,"

I think Sinead O'Connor should head there. And have Rosie O'Donnel, Madonna and Sean Penn join her.

I mean..how? fire cruise missiles into crowds of civilians outside of our embassy's in several different countries? This crap pisses me off as well; but there is no military solutuin to protests...now if they get into our compounds..I say shoot the hell out of them.

I think we should shut down all of the embassy's, and bring every soldier back home period. Let the Muslims kill
each other they have always been pretty good at that. Let them wage war against each other. Just don't let
any of them develop too large of an Army and of course no nukes. Bring everyone back home.

I endorse firing rockets into crowds of violent protesters who threaten our interests at home and abroad.

BY READING THIS POST YOU RECOGNIZE THAT IMATY IS THE LAST GREAT CRUSADER FOR TRUTH AND JUSTICE SO HELP YOU GOD.

I like Zaxby's better.

(09-14-2012 11:04 AM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  I think we should shut down all of the embassy's, and bring every soldier back home period. Let the Muslims kill
each other they have always been pretty good at that. Let them wage war against each other. Just don't let
any of them develop too large of an Army and of course no nukes. Bring everyone back home.

I agree....and....Close these embassies there and in the US and send ALL of these people back to their **** hole countries. Revoke ALL Visa's and tell any American in these countries to come home NOW or stay at YOUR own risk.

Ostracize these nations and have NOTHING to do with them again. Let them know CLEARLY that we will destroy them if they choose to ever screw with us again. They love being in the dark ages....so be it.

Someone needs to call KFC and ask if they serve Islamic Protesters "Extra Crispy."

(09-14-2012 11:13 AM)Smaug Wrote:  I like Zaxby's better.

Nuke them if they F with a Churches.

(09-14-2012 11:14 AM)Fo Shizzle Wrote:  

(09-14-2012 11:04 AM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  I think we should shut down all of the embassy's, and bring every soldier back home period. Let the Muslims kill
each other they have always been pretty good at that. Let them wage war against each other. Just don't let
any of them develop too large of an Army and of course no nukes. Bring everyone back home.

I agree....and....Close these embassies there and in the US and send ALL of these people back to their **** hole countries. Revoke ALL Visa's and tell any American in these countries to come home NOW or stay at YOUR own risk.

Ostracize these nations and have NOTHING to do with them again. Let them know CLEARLY that we will destroy them if they choose to ever screw with us again. They love being in the dark ages....so be it.

I agree, We get most of our oil from our own soil, Mexico, and Canada anyway.

We need to stop meddling in their internal affairs throughout the region. Let them decide whom they want to lead them. Then we tell that leader what our expectations are and make it very clear that we'll have a great relationship if he/she lives up to those expectations and that we'll invade his/her country, kill him/her, destroy his/her support infrastructure, and leave very quickly thereafter if he/she doesn't.

(09-14-2012 11:16 AM)Rebel Wrote:  

(09-14-2012 11:14 AM)Fo Shizzle Wrote:  

(09-14-2012 11:04 AM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  I think we should shut down all of the embassy's, and bring every soldier back home period. Let the Muslims kill
each other they have always been pretty good at that. Let them wage war against each other. Just don't let
any of them develop too large of an Army and of course no nukes. Bring everyone back home.

I agree....and....Close these embassies there and in the US and send ALL of these people back to their **** hole countries. Revoke ALL Visa's and tell any American in these countries to come home NOW or stay at YOUR own risk.

Ostracize these nations and have NOTHING to do with them again. Let them know CLEARLY that we will destroy them if they choose to ever screw with us again. They love being in the dark ages....so be it.

I agree, We get most of our oil from our own soil, Mexico, and Canada anyway.

Those GD Saudi's are not to be trusted. I have believed all along they are the financiers of most of the terrorism.

(09-14-2012 11:19 AM)Fo Shizzle Wrote:  Those GD Saudi's are not to be trusted. I have believed all along they are the financiers of most of the terrorism.

The problem with saying "the Saudis" is that Saudi is not a coherent country in the sense that an American or European would expect. There are so many factions that who knows what "the Saudis" might do. There's a royal family that holds it all together because they have so much oil money that they can buy people off, but below that it's basically just a bunch of would-be warlords who have been bought off.

(09-14-2012 11:22 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(09-14-2012 11:19 AM)Fo Shizzle Wrote:  Those GD Saudi's are not to be trusted. I have believed all along they are the financiers of most of the terrorism.

The problem with saying "the Saudis" is that Saudi is not a coherent country in the sense that an American or European would expect. There are so many factions that who knows what "the Saudis" might do. There's a royal family that holds it all together because they have so much oil money that they can buy people off, but below that it's basically just a bunch of would-be warlords who have been bought off.

I don't trust the Royal family ONE IOTA.

(09-14-2012 11:27 AM)Fo Shizzle Wrote:  

(09-14-2012 11:22 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(09-14-2012 11:19 AM)Fo Shizzle Wrote:  Those GD Saudi's are not to be trusted. I have believed all along they are the financiers of most of the terrorism.

The problem with saying "the Saudis" is that Saudi is not a coherent country in the sense that an American or European would expect. There are so many factions that who knows what "the Saudis" might do. There's a royal family that holds it all together because they have so much oil money that they can buy people off, but below that it's basically just a bunch of would-be warlords who have been bought off.

I don't trust the Royal family ONE IOTA.

Number one, the royal family is huge, and when you've got that many people, who knows what one or more of them might do? I've been told conflicting things by different princes, none of whom was very high on the prince totem pole.
Number two, the royal family doesn't exercise much control. I've had the Emir of Yanbu tell me very directly that he doesn't pay attention to Riyadh, and I doubt very seriously that he's the only one. He happened to have a yacht that was one of the more amazing ships I've ever seen--194' Vosper Thornycraft with a 3" gun forward and a swimming pool aft.

Civil War.

Declare War against what country?

1) Libya? We don't know all the facts yet, but the initial indications are that the attackers were Salafists not connected to the government. The government, while weak, is attempting to do what it can. The government in Libya has announced that it is not strong enough to control the whole nation. That's a pretty frank admission by a government.
2) Lebanon? We tried invading them before. So did the Israelis. It didn't work out so well. Lebanon is a civil war and is basically ungovernable due to tribal rivalries. So we invade, we 'win', and then...... what?
3) Egypt? There are less than a thousand people protesting in front of the US embassy in Cairo. About the same at our consulate in Alexandria. There are 80 million Egyptians. Those behind the attacks are largely rivals to the government. The government acted poorly (most likely as a result of , and will have to pay a price for that, but I see quietly delaying the IMF bailout as the best choice here. There will be massive reprecussions from this even without governmental action. Tourism is a massive revenue earner for Egypt. Tourists aren't going to go there in any significant numbers after the problems with the Salaifsts in the Sinai and now this. Morsi will pay for not speaking out sooner and for trying to pander to the Salafists by staying quiet. There is another nasty problem from this.... the video was produced by a Copt, which could start more communal violence between the Muslims and the Copts.
4) Sudan? Now in this case, the protests were called for by a Salafist preacher on state radio. We have awful relations with Sudan to begin with. I say just close the friggin embassy and encourage the Europeans to do the same.
5) Tunisia? Government is trying to stop the protests. They've got a bigger problem than Egypt. Their economy is virtually all from tourism, much of which is from Europe.
6) Yemen? Expected. I say move the embassy out of town. We're using it basically as a listening post on AQIY.
7) Pakistan? Expected. When we get out of Afghanistan, we can tell the ISI and their govt to go away.

Most Egyptians aren't Salafists. They are a loud minority. People would do well to remember that fact.

What would Reagan do?

Send Marines into Lebanon!

Tom, agree. We already have one war that we don't know whom we are fighting because it's a "war" against a concept. We don't need another. And I'm talking about military "wars" here. We have plenty of other "wars" that we'd be better off without.

(09-14-2012 11:22 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(09-14-2012 11:19 AM)Fo Shizzle Wrote:  Those GD Saudi's are not to be trusted. I have believed all along they are the financiers of most of the terrorism.

The problem with saying "the Saudis" is that Saudi is not a coherent country in the sense that an American or European would expect. There are so many factions that who knows what "the Saudis" might do. There's a royal family that holds it all together because they have so much oil money that they can buy people off, but below that it's basically just a bunch of would-be warlords who have been bought off.

You aren't kidding. The Saudi family doesn't go through pure heredity for succession. So each member of that HUGE family reaches out to different sectors in Saudi society in order to attempt to bolster their claims to the throne.