Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)


Post Reply 
UTA to the Sun Belt in 2013 ...
Author Message
Bookmark and Share
HawaiiMongoose Offline
All American
*

Posts: 4,761
Joined: Nov 2010
Reputation: 451
I Root For: Hawaii
Location: Honolulu
Post: #1
UTA to the Sun Belt in 2013 ...
... subject to the approval of the UT board of regents on Thursday.

http://www.theupsetblog.com/2012/05/ut-a...-2013.html
05-21-2012 12:55 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


Atlanta Trojan Offline
Sun Belt Nationalist
*

Posts: 12,804
Joined: Sep 2010
Reputation: 179
I Root For: TROY
Location: Senoia Ga
Post: #2
RE: UTA to the Sun Belt in 2013 ...
Yay........03-pissed
05-21-2012 12:57 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
MG61 Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 5,137
Joined: Jun 2010
Reputation: 79
I Root For: UNT
Location:
Post: #3
RE: UTA to the Sun Belt in 2013 ...
Congrats to UTA. You will be bringing a good basketball & baseball program to the Sun Belt.
05-21-2012 12:58 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
topper1296 Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 2,230
Joined: Mar 2004
Reputation: 135
I Root For: WKU
Location: Nashville, TN
Post: #4
RE: UTA to the Sun Belt in 2013 ...
UTA men's bball RPI

2011/2012 - 110
2010/2011 - 272
2009/2010 - 235
2008/2009 - 187
2007/2008 - 176

5 year average of 196
05-21-2012 01:50 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
PTJR Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 6,206
Joined: Jan 2009
Reputation: 9
I Root For: LR / UR / CU
Location: Little Rock
Post: #5
RE: UTA to the Sun Belt in 2013 ...
(05-21-2012 01:50 PM)topper1296 Wrote:  UTA men's bball RPI

2011/2012 - 110
2010/2011 - 272
2009/2010 - 235
2008/2009 - 187
2007/2008 - 176

5 year average of 196

Not that the Sun Belt's average RPI has been anything to write home about lately, but I do believe that playing in the Sun Belt will allow UTA to raise its RPI just by the level of competition in league play.
05-21-2012 01:55 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
ManzanoWolf Offline
Sun Belt Nationalist
*

Posts: 2,831
Joined: Dec 2005
Reputation: 95
I Root For: stAte
Location: Phoenix Metro
Post: #6
RE: UTA to the Sun Belt in 2013 ...
TABLE OF CONTENTS FOR SPECIAL CALLED TELEPHONE MEETING of THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SYSTEM BOARD OF REGENTS

Thursday, May 24, 2012
Austin, Texas

A. CONVENE THE BOARD IN OPEN SESSION TO CONSIDER AGENDA ITEMS

1. U. T. Arlington: Authorization to accept invitation from the Sun Belt Conference and to negotiate and finalize terms for athletic conference membership
Action: President Spaniolo, Mr. Burgdorf

RECOMMENDATION

The Chancellor concurs in the recommendation of the Interim Executive Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs, the Vice Chancellor and General Counsel, and President Spaniolo that authorization be granted to U. T. Arlington to accept an invitation from the Sun Belt Conference (SBC) to become a member, and to negotiate and finalize terms for athletic conference membership.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

On July 14, 2011, after receiving approval from the Board of Regents on the same day, U. T. Arlington accepted an invitation to join the Western Athletic Conference (WAC), a National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Football Bowl Subdivision (FBS) conference. U. T. Arlington is not scheduled to officially join the WAC until July 1, 2012.

However, since U. T. Arlington accepted the invitation to join the WAC, five member institutions have declared their intent to leave the WAC. The institutions that have announced their intention to join new conferences are: San Jose State University, Utah State University, Louisiana Tech University, Texas State University, and U. T. San Antonio. As a result, the WAC is in a precarious situation and its future is in question.

Officials at the SBC contacted U. T. Arlington in April 2012 to initiate a discussion about the possibility of U. T. Arlington leaving the WAC to join the SBC. President Spaniolo and Mr. Jim Baker, Athletic Director at U. T. Arlington, have engaged in several discussions with Mr. Karl Benson, Commissioner of the SBC, regarding U. T. Arlington joining the SBC. The formal invitation to join the SBC was extended on May 7, 2012.

U. T. Arlington's current plan is to participate in the WAC until July 1, 2013, the proposed effective date for joining the SBC. The SBC represents a more stable, equally competitive conference composed of similar institutions with comparable academic quality to U. T. Arlington. U. T. Arlington would be the second non-football institution in the SBC along with the University of Arkansas at Little Rock.

The SBC is geographically more compact, and thus travel costs and time away from the campus for U. T. Arlington student athletes should be less than in the WAC. In addition, Texas State University, a long time athletic rival and current member of the Southland Conference, who is moving to the WAC in July 2012 for one year, will be joining the SBC in July 2013.

Had the opportunity to join the SBC been available a year ago, U. T. Arlington would have moved in that direction.

Joining the SBC will build equity in a U. T. Arlington degree through greater national visibility and association with universities of similar enrollment, academic standing, and community size. U. T. Arlington has determined that a move to this new conference is consistent with the University's strategic plan to increase its national prominence in support of its goal to become a national research university. Competing in the new conference would leverage U. T. Arlington's efforts to upgrade the competitiveness of its 15 sports teams, particularly in men's and women's basketball.

There are no exit fees involved with U. T. Arlington's departure from the WAC. The entry fee payable to the SBC is $300,000, and will be covered through a combination of Athletic Department funds and conference revenues payable to U. T. Arlington pursuant to the New Member Agreement with the SBC. U. T. Arlington reports that revenues generated by U. T. Arlington from television and the NCAA are likely to be comparable or greater with the SBC than with those earned by the WAC.

http://www.utsystem.edu/sites/utsfiles/o...2012AB.pdf
(This post was last modified: 05-21-2012 02:27 PM by ManzanoWolf.)
05-21-2012 02:21 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


DrGonzo Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 2,101
Joined: Mar 2012
Reputation: 134
I Root For: App State
Location:
Post: #7
RE: UTA to the Sun Belt in 2013 ...
http://toppatime.wordpress.com/2012/05/1...o-add-uta/


"That plan will likely include whether future expansion is necessary, future conference championship sites and a restructured television partnership, amongst other things."


Meanwhile, Charlie Cobb desperately moves from radio station to radio station, begging to be invited to CUSA.

[Image: stewartfacepalm.jpg]
05-21-2012 02:36 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Crump1 Offline
All American
*

Posts: 3,747
Joined: Oct 2009
Reputation: 107
I Root For: stAte
Location:
Post: #8
RE: UTA to the Sun Belt in 2013 ...
Those of us who favor expansion to 12 football schools need to make our wishes known to our respective presidents.

Also, we have a guy on the ASU board who likes to boast of the academic intergrity of the Big Ten and PAC 12 while using that as an excuse for their lack of titles. It amuses me when people get so worked up about how a school fits academically in a conference. I am an alum of a Sun Belt school but if another school meets FBS criteria, competes well and creates a good gameday environment I really don't care what degree programs they offer. It's nice I suppose but no SEC alum or fan would trade places with a Big Ten alum or fan for that reason.
05-21-2012 02:51 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
ManzanoWolf Offline
Sun Belt Nationalist
*

Posts: 2,831
Joined: Dec 2005
Reputation: 95
I Root For: stAte
Location: Phoenix Metro
Post: #9
RE: UTA to the Sun Belt in 2013 ...
(05-21-2012 02:51 PM)Crump1 Wrote:  Those of us who favor expansion to 12 football schools need to make our wishes known to our respective presidents.

Also, we have a guy on the ASU board who likes to boast of the academic intergrity of the Big Ten and PAC 12 while using that as an excuse for their lack of titles. It amuses me when people get so worked up about how a school fits academically in a conference. I am an alum of a Sun Belt school but if another school meets FBS criteria, competes well and creates a good gameday environment I really don't care what degree programs they offer. It's nice I suppose but no SEC alum or fan would trade places with a Big Ten alum or fan for that reason.

I sent an email to our Prez and AD expressing my support for adding both App State and Georgia Southern to the SBC as full members.
05-21-2012 02:59 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
asumike83 Offline
2nd String
*

Posts: 410
Joined: Feb 2012
Reputation: 35
I Root For: App State
Location: Raleigh, NC
Post: #10
RE: UTA to the Sun Belt in 2013 ...
(05-21-2012 02:59 PM)ManzanoWolf Wrote:  I sent an email to our Prez and AD expressing my support for adding both App State and Georgia Southern to the SBC as full members.

Much appreciated, sir. 04-cheers
05-21-2012 03:12 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
DrGonzo Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 2,101
Joined: Mar 2012
Reputation: 134
I Root For: App State
Location:
Post: #11
RE: UTA to the Sun Belt in 2013 ...
(05-21-2012 02:59 PM)ManzanoWolf Wrote:  
(05-21-2012 02:51 PM)Crump1 Wrote:  Those of us who favor expansion to 12 football schools need to make our wishes known to our respective presidents.

Also, we have a guy on the ASU board who likes to boast of the academic intergrity of the Big Ten and PAC 12 while using that as an excuse for their lack of titles. It amuses me when people get so worked up about how a school fits academically in a conference. I am an alum of a Sun Belt school but if another school meets FBS criteria, competes well and creates a good gameday environment I really don't care what degree programs they offer. It's nice I suppose but no SEC alum or fan would trade places with a Big Ten alum or fan for that reason.

I sent an email to our Prez and AD expressing my support for adding both App State and Georgia Southern to the SBC as full members.

04-cheers
05-21-2012 03:38 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


MICHAELSPAPPY Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 26,819
Joined: May 2002
Reputation: 33
I Root For: CHI ST, CROWLEY, TEX WES
Location: Booneville, Arkansas
Post: #12
RE: UTA to the Sun Belt in 2013 ...
Glad to have you, Arlington.
05-21-2012 05:42 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Bobcat87 Offline
San Marvelous Cat
*

Posts: 10,525
Joined: May 2012
Reputation: 361
I Root For: TXST, A&M, UNT
Location: Texas
Post: #13
RE: UTA to the Sun Belt in 2013 ...
(05-21-2012 05:42 PM)MICHAELSPAPPY Wrote:  Glad to have you, Arlington.

UTA, Welcome to the party . . .02-13-banana
05-21-2012 05:54 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Cat79 Offline
Sun Belt Nationalist
*

Posts: 741
Joined: Jan 2007
Reputation: 14
I Root For: Texas State
Location: Pearland, Texas
Post: #14
RE: UTA to the Sun Belt in 2013 ...
Congrats UTA!!!!
05-21-2012 09:51 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
GSU Eagles Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 5,010
Joined: Aug 2009
Reputation: 76
I Root For: GeorgiaSouthern
Location:
Post: #15
RE: UTA to the Sun Belt in 2013 ...
[/quote]

I sent an email to our Prez and AD expressing my support for adding both App State and Georgia Southern to the SBC as full members.



[/quote]

You da Man-Zano!
05-21-2012 09:56 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
chiefsfan Offline
No Seriously, they let me be a mod
*

Posts: 43,769
Joined: Sep 2007
Reputation: 1066
I Root For: ASU
Location:
Post: #16
RE: UTA to the Sun Belt in 2013 ...
Part of me is wondering whether or not those emails should be sent to App State's Administration rather then our own. Sort of a "we want you, come join us" type thing. They seem to be paying a lot of attention to the other leagues.
05-21-2012 11:10 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


PTJR Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 6,206
Joined: Jan 2009
Reputation: 9
I Root For: LR / UR / CU
Location: Little Rock
Post: #17
RE: UTA to the Sun Belt in 2013 ...
(05-21-2012 11:10 PM)chiefsfan Wrote:  Part of me is wondering whether or not those emails should be sent to App State's Administration rather then our own. Sort of a "we want you, come join us" type thing. They seem to be paying a lot of attention to the other leagues.

Come on. Get real. Do you really think your emails to whomever will influence any University's decision on not only conference affiliation, but the level of NCAA football that University will play?

If emails from the brass at MTSU went by the board with the CUSA, what attention do you figure yours will get?

http://www.dnj.com/article/20120520/BLUE...-Case-CUSA
(This post was last modified: 05-21-2012 11:41 PM by PTJR.)
05-21-2012 11:40 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
voss749 Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 723
Joined: May 2012
Reputation: 29
I Root For: FAU
Location:
Post: #18
RE: UTA to the Sun Belt in 2013 ...
Likewise I also sent an email to my University's President.
05-22-2012 12:20 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Tuffguy21 Offline
Sun Belt Nationalist
*

Posts: 1,866
Joined: Feb 2009
Reputation: 87
I Root For: UL Ragin Cajuns
Location: Lafayette Louisiana
Post: #19
RE: UTA to the Sun Belt in 2013 ...
(05-21-2012 02:51 PM)Crump1 Wrote:  Those of us who favor expansion to 12 football schools need to make our wishes known to our respective presidents.

Also, we have a guy on the ASU board who likes to boast of the academic intergrity of the Big Ten and PAC 12 while using that as an excuse for their lack of titles. It amuses me when people get so worked up about how a school fits academically in a conference. I am an alum of a Sun Belt school but if another school meets FBS criteria, competes well and creates a good gameday environment I really don't care what degree programs they offer. It's nice I suppose but no SEC alum or fan would trade places with a Big Ten alum or fan for that reason.

I hate to sound pessimistic, but I really don't think it'll matter at this point. Collectively, the presidents of the SBC schools are determined to add schools like UTA who literally offer NOTHING (not even football)but a market. I seriously don't think ANYTHING we can say or do will get them to start actively making wise decisions for the conference.
05-22-2012 12:29 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
voss749 Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 723
Joined: May 2012
Reputation: 29
I Root For: FAU
Location:
Post: #20
RE: UTA to the Sun Belt in 2013 ...
[/quote]

I hate to sound pessimistic, but I really don't think it'll matter at this point. Collectively, the presidents of the SBC schools are determined to add schools like UTA who literally offer NOTHING (not even football)but a market. I seriously don't think ANYTHING we can say or do will get them to start actively making wise decisions for the conference.
[/quote]

Have you even tried to write an email? It takes 15 minutes :)

UTA has nothing to do with the decision to add football schools.

They have no football program and the university has no intention of restarting it.
05-22-2012 12:44 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.