Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
Phil Sheridan: Temple needs to say no to Big East
Author Message
The Brown Bull Offline
usf97
*

Posts: 2,839
Joined: Nov 2010
Reputation: 94
I Root For: USF
Location:
Post: #1
Phil Sheridan: Temple needs to say no to Big East
Clearly this guy has an axe to grind. I like his logic at the end of the article. How exactly does he propose that the Owls' will get ahead of the conference realignment curve.....instead of being afterthoughts? Did I miss the ACC or Big 10 invite? 05-stirthepot

http://www.philly.com/philly/sports/brea...07993.html


The worst thing Temple could do is jump at the chance to join a Big East that just doesn't exist anymore. This is the Owls' chance to get ahead of the conference realignment curve instead of being afterthoughts.
02-28-2012 11:16 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


Lord2FLI Away
Peanut Vendor
*

Posts: 4,271
Joined: Oct 2011
Reputation: 451
I Root For: The End
Location:
Post: #2
RE: Phil Sheridan: Temple needs to say no to Big East
Phil Sheridan needs to shut the hell up lol
02-28-2012 11:18 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
DFW HOYA Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 5,484
Joined: May 2004
Reputation: 271
I Root For: Georgetown
Location: Dallas, TX
Post: #3
RE: Phil Sheridan: Temple needs to say no to Big East
(02-28-2012 11:16 PM)The Brown Bull Wrote:  The worst thing Temple could do is jump at the chance to join a Big East that just doesn't exist anymore.

Really? Someone should tell that to Notre Dame, Georgetown, Louisville, and the rest of the crew...
02-28-2012 11:22 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
UCF08 Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 12,262
Joined: Feb 2011
Reputation: 211
I Root For: UCF
Location:
Post: #4
RE: Phil Sheridan: Temple needs to say no to Big East
Like the A10 wouldn't take them back if the Big East fell apart?
02-28-2012 11:25 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
SDSU-Alum2003 Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 729
Joined: Dec 2011
Reputation: 38
I Root For: San Diego State
Location: San Diego, CA
Post: #5
RE: Phil Sheridan: Temple needs to say no to Big East
Too bad they won't. Writing is on the wall dude... they are gone.
02-28-2012 11:37 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
ClairtonPanther Offline
people need to wake up
*

Posts: 25,056
Joined: Mar 2005
Reputation: 777
I Root For: Pitt/Navy
Location: Portland, Oregon

Donators
Post: #6
RE: Phil Sheridan: Temple needs to say no to Big East
now lets try this again. 04-cheers

the other posts are here; http://csnbbs.com/showthread.php?tid=557908
02-28-2012 11:51 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


BullsFanInTX Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 10,485
Joined: May 2008
Reputation: 338
I Root For: USF
Location:
Post: #7
RE: Phil Sheridan: Temple needs to say no to Big East
This has got to be the dumbest artice I have read in a long time. Soooo. Let's see what Temple's other options are. ACC....nope. Well, then, Big 10.....nope. Stay in MAC....YES, That's the ticket!
02-29-2012 12:09 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
wvucrazed Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 6,363
Joined: Apr 2004
Reputation: 179
I Root For: West Virginia
Location: Fairfax, VA
Post: #8
RE: Phil Sheridan: Temple needs to say no to Big East
Meatball is gonna love this lol
02-29-2012 12:10 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
cttu Offline
Bench Warmer
*

Posts: 107
Joined: Feb 2012
Reputation: 9
I Root For: Temple
Location:
Post: #9
RE: Phil Sheridan: Temple needs to say no to Big East
worst article ever. guy is a joke who has a nova agenda, please dont think the majority of ppl in philly think this way. even with that "revenge factor" the increased competition, and mainly millions of dollars the move would bring in is enough to make you accept an offer 100% of the time.
02-29-2012 12:22 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
TUJim Offline
Bench Warmer
*

Posts: 206
Joined: Oct 2011
Reputation: 9
I Root For: Temple U
Location: Bucks County, PA
Post: #10
RE: Phil Sheridan: Temple needs to say no to Big East
Right, pitching the MAC to recruits will be a big sell. Don't get me wrong I'm not going to knock the MAC, but let's say no to a better tv deal, better bowl tie-ins and keep playing those Wednesday night games, go 8-4 and not get a bowl invite. Plus what's going to get more people to the Linc, a Saturday afternoon game against Rutgers or Wednesday night iMAC game in November.
02-29-2012 08:19 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
The Brown Bull Offline
usf97
*

Posts: 2,839
Joined: Nov 2010
Reputation: 94
I Root For: USF
Location:
Post: #11
RE: Phil Sheridan: Temple needs to say no to Big East
His final premise is kind of like saying:

Just say no to work....and become a Millionaire.

Um....okay.
02-29-2012 08:25 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


KnightLight Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 27,664
Joined: Sep 2003
Reputation: 700
I Root For: UCF
Location:
Post: #12
RE: Phil Sheridan: Temple needs to say no to Big East
(02-29-2012 12:22 AM)cttu Wrote:  worst article ever. guy is a joke who has a nova agenda, please dont think the majority of ppl in philly think this way. even with that "revenge factor" the increased competition, and mainly millions of dollars the move would bring in is enough to make you accept an offer 100% of the time.

Does he?

He is a 1985 TEMPLE Grad....he just seems butthurt over the fact that Temple was once kicked out of the "old" Big East.

For him to question that the MAC might be a better option for Temple than the new Big East...that's all one needed to know that he wrote the article just to get a reaction.

If Temple receives a Big East invite (for a 2nd time), he will probably pop up a bottle of Champagne at home to celebrate...then jump online and write about what a mistake it was for Temple to say yes.

That's Journalism 101 in 2012...as his column will be the counter to the other 2-3 POSITIVE articles written by others at the paper if Temple joins the Big East.

Long ago...writers would generally write stories on what they thinking at the time...now...its whatever generates the most hits/attracts most viewers.
(This post was last modified: 02-29-2012 08:31 AM by KnightLight.)
02-29-2012 08:29 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
quo vadis Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 50,235
Joined: Aug 2008
Reputation: 2443
I Root For: USF/Georgetown
Location: New Orleans
Post: #13
RE: Phil Sheridan: Temple needs to say no to Big East
(02-29-2012 12:22 AM)cttu Wrote:  worst article ever. guy is a joke who has a nova agenda...

Since Nova has been a member of the Big East in good standing for more than 30 years, i don't have any problem with anyone having a "Nova agenda".

07-coffee3
02-29-2012 08:44 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
wvucrazed Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 6,363
Joined: Apr 2004
Reputation: 179
I Root For: West Virginia
Location: Fairfax, VA
Post: #14
RE: Phil Sheridan: Temple needs to say no to Big East
Not that Temple would or should turn down the BE invite, but it is the height of irony that the BE is forced to turn to the program they kicked out unceremoniously not too long ago in order to save their bacon. Temple was never good enough for the BE, and now all of a sudden the BE finds itself in a tight spot, Temple is desirable. Not surprised there are bruised feelings about the situation.
02-29-2012 09:13 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
KnightLight Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 27,664
Joined: Sep 2003
Reputation: 700
I Root For: UCF
Location:
Post: #15
RE: Phil Sheridan: Temple needs to say no to Big East
(02-29-2012 09:13 AM)wvucrazed Wrote:  Not that Temple would or should turn down the BE invite, but it is the height of irony that the BE is forced to turn to the program they kicked out unceremoniously not too long ago in order to save their bacon. Temple was never good enough for the BE, and now all of a sudden the BE finds itself in a tight spot, Temple is desirable. Not surprised there are bruised feelings about the situation.

Not really...because the Temple Athletic Program in 2012 is NOT the same Athletic Program (especially in Football) that Temple had from 1991-2004. when they were members of Big East Football Conf.

Now if Temple had done nothing to improve their football program over the last 8 years, then your above statement would be true...but Temple Football has done almost a 180 degree turn since 2004 (i.e. invested in on-campus facilities, increased their budget, made better coaching hires, etc...).
(This post was last modified: 02-29-2012 09:17 AM by KnightLight.)
02-29-2012 09:17 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
NYCTUFan Offline
All American
*

Posts: 2,511
Joined: Dec 2011
Reputation: 169
I Root For: Temple
Location: New York City
Post: #16
RE: Phil Sheridan: Temple needs to say no to Big East
(02-28-2012 11:16 PM)The Brown Bull Wrote:  Clearly this guy has an axe to grind. I like his logic at the end of the article. How exactly does he propose that the Owls' will get ahead of the conference realignment curve.....instead of being afterthoughts? Did I miss the ACC or Big 10 invite? 05-stirthepot

http://www.philly.com/philly/sports/brea...07993.html


The worst thing Temple could do is jump at the chance to join a Big East that just doesn't exist anymore. This is the Owls' chance to get ahead of the conference realignment curve instead of being afterthoughts.

Contrarian views always attract readers and evoke emotion. Of the 100 articles written about Temple joining the Big East 99 have been positive, but this is the one people are talking about.

It’s nothing but an opinion piece, he’s entitled to his opinion, and its my feeling that the purpose was to attract eyes to the story, differentiate his story from the other 10 out there today, nothing more.
02-29-2012 09:19 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


BigEastHomer Offline
Banned

Posts: 11,730
Joined: Oct 2011
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #17
RE: Phil Sheridan: Temple needs to say no to Big East
(02-29-2012 09:19 AM)NYCTUFan Wrote:  
(02-28-2012 11:16 PM)The Brown Bull Wrote:  Clearly this guy has an axe to grind. I like his logic at the end of the article. How exactly does he propose that the Owls' will get ahead of the conference realignment curve.....instead of being afterthoughts? Did I miss the ACC or Big 10 invite? 05-stirthepot

http://www.philly.com/philly/sports/brea...07993.html


The worst thing Temple could do is jump at the chance to join a Big East that just doesn't exist anymore. This is the Owls' chance to get ahead of the conference realignment curve instead of being afterthoughts.

Contrarian views always attract readers and evoke emotion. Of the 100 articles written about Temple joining the Big East 99 have been positive, but this is the one people are talking about.

It’s nothing but an opinion piece, he’s entitled to his opinion, and its my feeling that the purpose was to attract eyes to the story, differentiate his story from the other 10 out there today, nothing more.

+1
02-29-2012 09:43 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
bitcruncher Offline
pepperoni roll psycho...
*

Posts: 61,859
Joined: Jan 2006
Reputation: 526
I Root For: West Virginia
Location: Knoxville, TN
Post: #18
RE: Phil Sheridan: Temple needs to say no to Big East
As long as it's an all-sports invite, Temple should jump at it. But anyone at Temple considering a partial membership is committing suicide...
02-29-2012 10:08 AM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Wooglin157 Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 2,048
Joined: Oct 2010
Reputation: 64
I Root For: UCF Knights
Location:
Post: #19
RE: Phil Sheridan: Temple needs to say no to Big East
(02-29-2012 09:13 AM)wvucrazed Wrote:  Not that Temple would or should turn down the BE invite, but it is the height of irony that the BE is forced to turn to the program they kicked out unceremoniously not too long ago in order to save their bacon. Temple was never good enough for the BE, and now all of a sudden the BE finds itself in a tight spot, Temple is desirable. Not surprised there are bruised feelings about the situation.
Is the BE really reaching out to Temple to save them? The BE is already "saved." At this point the expansion is on insurance and just finally building up membership numbers past the 8 FBS schools.

And Temple was good enough for the BE - they were an original FB playing member. Temple just decided to neglect the FB, though and the BE wasn't having it. Now that they have things back in order - why not look at them? Plus they have a chance to gain their good BB program too.
02-29-2012 10:49 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Lolly Popp Offline
Magically Delicious
*

Posts: 2,425
Joined: Oct 2005
Reputation: 82
I Root For: Football
Location: Endzone
Post: #20
RE: Phil Sheridan: Temple needs to say no to Big East
Temple is needed to "save" next year's football schedules and keep basketball at 16 teams. It would be a complete disaster if the seven continuing Big East schools had to play two FCS games because of the late exit by WVU, or do mirror games against conference opponents, something Syracuse and Rutgers have already publicly said "no" to anyway.

Temple makes sense and the invitation for all sports is already chugging down the tracks. I don't even think Villanova's dirtiest private investigators can find enough skeletons in anyone's closets to blackmail the league out of doing the right thing now. This fall's Big East will feature 5 of the 2004 squads plus the 2005 trio in the final year of 8 members.
02-29-2012 05:05 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.