(11-05-2011 10:38 PM)GrandPointEagle Wrote:  He will more than likely be forced to register as a sex offender.

I really hope not. Fine him and make it go away.

(11-06-2011 12:12 PM)Frank Rizzo Wrote:  First off I'm a 21 year retired (17 in Spec Ops if that means anything) combat vet...I was at the game with my ECU student son when this happened...Gotta say I laughed my butt off!!! Classless and disrespectful yeah, but I've learned to live in the present and not dwell in the past like so many do, so I guess I wasn't offended personally. Take in account this was at a college full of young adults, I saw some crazy/rude stunts like this pulled in the military as well, trust me. The young children at the game is an issue to some I suppose, however my sisters and I saw a streaker when we were little kids in the 70's, we just thought it was weird and funny and pressed on, still laugh about it......One thing is for sure, there are some P.O.'d people on here and I sure wouldn't want to be this fool! If you look at his mug shot it's clear he ain't very happy LOL! This was hilarious, haven't laughed like that in awhile!!!! GO ECU!!!!

Hear hear!

(11-06-2011 05:02 PM)MadEagle Wrote:  Real Pirates would make him walk the plank lol

Or give him a puffy shirt.

(11-05-2011 10:13 PM)PirateNation Wrote:  Yep, we had a streaker. He did a cartwheel, did a dance, dodged a tackle and made it to midfield from the endzone.

Pics courtesy of ECU's Photographer...

To the non-parents of a small child. You do not understand.

To the parents of small children who think it is fun, funny and no big deal for a man to expose himself to them, we will never agree.

To the people who think that a adult male exposing himself and simulating sexual movements in the presence of minor children is not a form of molestation, we again will never agree.

To the people who claim your small children are seeing naked people on TV and the internet at the age of 6-7-8 years old, you may need to re-evaluate your parenting skills. If you are a person that actually claims to have shown the video to your minor child, you should be visited by Social Services.

To the people who love the public nudity in Europe, you are free to move there.

To the new posters that have crawled out of the woodwork to defend their "friend", you should explain to him that pride is a sin for a reason. IF some lawsuits do come his way, bragging about exposing himself on a open Facebook page (screen shot) will most likely not play to his advantage if he is going to claim he was drunk, under the influence, did not know what he was doing, sorry for his actions, wish he had not done it. And since the picture he posted contained children....good luck with your defense!!

To the people who think there is only one random person on a message board that is dead serious about this issue and not several even more serious. You should talk to your "friend" and prepare him for the attention that he is about to get. $1500 and a misdemeanor charge is going to seem like a happy memory.

(11-07-2011 11:48 AM)Topcard91 Wrote:  To the new posters that have crawled out of the woodwork to defend their "friend", you should explain to him that pride is a sin for a reason. IF some lawsuits do come his way, bragging about exposing himself on a open Facebook page (screen shot) will most likely not play to his advantage if he is going to claim he was drunk, under the influence, did not know what he was doing, sorry for his actions, wish he had not done it.

Whoa Whoa Whoa? He posted something on facebook? What's all this about? Where's this screenshot you speak of?

(11-07-2011 11:48 AM)Topcard91 Wrote:  To the non-parents of a small child. You do not understand.

To the parents of small children who think it is fun, funny and no big deal for a man to expose himself to them, we will never agree.

To the people who think that a adult male exposing himself and simulating sexual movements in the presence of minor children is not a form of molestation, we again will never agree.

To the people who claim your small children are seeing naked people on TV and the internet at the age of 6-7-8 years old, you may need to re-evaluate your parenting skills. If you are a person that actually claims to have shown the video to your minor child, you should be visited by Social Services.

To the people who love the public nudity in Europe, you are free to move there.

To the new posters that have crawled out of the woodwork to defend their "friend", you should explain to him that pride is a sin for a reason. IF some lawsuits do come his way, bragging about exposing himself on a open Facebook page (screen shot) will most likely not play to his advantage if he is going to claim he was drunk, under the influence, did not know what he was doing, sorry for his actions, wish he had not done it. And since the picture he posted contained children....good luck with your defense!!

To the people who think there is only one random person on a message board that is dead serious about this issue and not several even more serious. You should talk to your "friend" and prepare him for the attention that he is about to get. $1500 and a misdemeanor charge is going to seem like a happy memory.

Look, don't tell me I don't understand. I know I'm not a parent, but Im damn sure capable of understanding the anger, frustration, embarrassment and other feelings associated with this. I wasn't trying to make light of the situation, just trying to say that you are likely wasting your time with a lawsuit. What are you going to sue for, pain and suffering? Tell me this, how will that make our legal system any better? Would you agree that this potential case would take time that could be used against a real criminal, one who stole/physically harmed/killed someone?

We can't tell you how to live your life, but you can't tell other parents how to live theirs or how to raise their children.

(11-07-2011 11:48 AM)Topcard91 Wrote:  To the non-parents of a small child. You do not understand.

To the parents of small children who think it is fun, funny and no big deal for a man to expose himself to them, we will never agree.

To the people who think that a adult male exposing himself and simulating sexual movements in the presence of minor children is not a form of molestation, we again will never agree.

To the people who claim your small children are seeing naked people on TV and the internet at the age of 6-7-8 years old, you may need to re-evaluate your parenting skills. If you are a person that actually claims to have shown the video to your minor child, you should be visited by Social Services.

To the people who love the public nudity in Europe, you are free to move there.

To the new posters that have crawled out of the woodwork to defend their "friend", you should explain to him that pride is a sin for a reason. IF some lawsuits do come his way, bragging about exposing himself on a open Facebook page (screen shot) will most likely not play to his advantage if he is going to claim he was drunk, under the influence, did not know what he was doing, sorry for his actions, wish he had not done it. And since the picture he posted contained children....good luck with your defense!!

To the people who think there is only one random person on a message board that is dead serious about this issue and not several even more serious. You should talk to your "friend" and prepare him for the attention that he is about to get. $1500 and a misdemeanor charge is going to seem like a happy memory.

This is ridiculous. You are ridiculous.

TP, I not a parent, I do understand your anger, but your going way over top. You think he should be forced to register as a sex offender for the rest of his life and be subject to death threats, violence, forced to move over and over again for one stupid act. Yeah that's what should be done to this kid. Oh, and what about my tax dollars your thinking about waisting in a law suit and adding yet another stupid civil suite with little legal merit or chance of ever getting past a few hearings. Your pissed so why not waist more time and tax payer money.

Get over it! I don't know which is more stupid, the guys decision to run naked on the field or your over reaction to it. I suggest you use it as a lesson to your kids to teach right v wrong and that you will answer for your actions as the guys is going to have to do. He been charged and with have to face a judge now.

Quote:§ 14‑190.1. Obscene literature and exhibitions.

(a) It shall be unlawful for any person, firm or corporation to intentionally disseminate obscenity. A person, firm or corporation disseminates obscenity within the meaning of this Article if he or it:

(1) Sells, delivers or provides or offers or agrees to sell, deliver or provide any obscene writing, picture, record or other representation or embodiment of the obscene; or

(2) Presents or directs an obscene play, dance or other performance or participates directly in that portion thereof which makes it obscene; or
(3) Publishes, exhibits or otherwise makes available anything obscene; or

(4) Exhibits, presents, rents, sells, delivers or provides; or offers or agrees to exhibit, present, rent or to provide: any obscene still or motion picture, film, filmstrip, or projection slide, or sound recording, sound tape, or sound track, or any matter or material of whatever form which is a representation, embodiment, performance, or publication of the obscene.

(b) For purposes of this Article any material is obscene if:

(1) The material depicts or describes in a patently offensive way sexual conduct specifically defined by subsection © of this section; and

(2) The average person applying contemporary community standards relating to the depiction or description of sexual matters would find that the material taken as a whole appeals to the prurient interest in sex; and

(3) The material lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value; and

(4) The material as used is not protected or privileged under the Constitution of the United States or the Constitution of North Carolina.

© As used in this Article, "sexual conduct" means:

(1) Vaginal, anal, or oral intercourse, whether actual or simulated, normal or perverted; or

(2) Masturbation, excretory functions, or lewd exhibition of uncovered genitals; or(3) An act or condition that depicts torture, physical restraint by being fettered or bound, or flagellation of or by a nude person or a person clad in undergarments or in revealing or bizarre costume.

(d) Obscenity shall be judged with reference to ordinary adults except that it shall be judged with reference to children or other especially susceptible audiences if it appears from the character of the material or the circumstances of its dissemination to be especially designed for or directed to such children or audiences.(e) It shall be unlawful for any person, firm or corporation to knowingly and intentionally create, buy, procure or possess obscene material with the purpose and intent of disseminating it unlawfully.

(f) It shall be unlawful for a person, firm or corporation to advertise or otherwise promote the sale of material represented or held out by said person, firm or corporation as obscene.

(g) Violation of this section is a Class I felony.
(h) Obscene material disseminated, procured, or promoted in violation of this section is contraband.

(i) Nothing in this section shall be deemed to preempt local government regulation of the location or operation of sexually oriented businesses to the extent consistent with the constitutional protection afforded free speech. (1971, c. 405, s. 1; 1973, c. 1434, s. 1; 1985, c. 703, s. 1; 1993, c. 539, s. 1194; 1994, Ex. Sess., c. 24, s. 14©; 1998‑46, s. 2.)

I think they should've just taken him straight from the game to one of Greenville's gay clubs and tossed him in as punishment.

(11-07-2011 01:55 PM)gdunn Wrote:  I think they should've just taken him straight from the game to one of Greenville's gay clubs and tossed him in as punishment.

Does Greenville have a gay club?


I still think they should have tased him.

(11-07-2011 01:56 PM)GrayBeard Wrote:  

(11-07-2011 01:55 PM)gdunn Wrote:  I think they should've just taken him straight from the game to one of Greenville's gay clubs and tossed him in as punishment.

Does Greenville have a gay club?


I still think they should have tased him.

I thought all your clubs were gay

(11-07-2011 01:49 PM)Topcard91 Wrote:  

Quote:§ 14‑190.1. Obscene literature and exhibitions.

(a) It shall be unlawful for any person, firm or corporation to intentionally disseminate obscenity. A person, firm or corporation disseminates obscenity within the meaning of this Article if he or it:

(1) Sells, delivers or provides or offers or agrees to sell, deliver or provide any obscene writing, picture, record or other representation or embodiment of the obscene; or

(2) Presents or directs an obscene play, dance or other performance or participates directly in that portion thereof which makes it obscene; or
(3) Publishes, exhibits or otherwise makes available anything obscene; or

(4) Exhibits, presents, rents, sells, delivers or provides; or offers or agrees to exhibit, present, rent or to provide: any obscene still or motion picture, film, filmstrip, or projection slide, or sound recording, sound tape, or sound track, or any matter or material of whatever form which is a representation, embodiment, performance, or publication of the obscene.

(b) For purposes of this Article any material is obscene if:

(1) The material depicts or describes in a patently offensive way sexual conduct specifically defined by subsection © of this section; and

(2) The average person applying contemporary community standards relating to the depiction or description of sexual matters would find that the material taken as a whole appeals to the prurient interest in sex; and

(3) The material lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value; and

(4) The material as used is not protected or privileged under the Constitution of the United States or the Constitution of North Carolina.

© As used in this Article, "sexual conduct" means:

(1) Vaginal, anal, or oral intercourse, whether actual or simulated, normal or perverted; or

(2) Masturbation, excretory functions, or lewd exhibition of uncovered genitals; or(3) An act or condition that depicts torture, physical restraint by being fettered or bound, or flagellation of or by a nude person or a person clad in undergarments or in revealing or bizarre costume.

(d) Obscenity shall be judged with reference to ordinary adults except that it shall be judged with reference to children or other especially susceptible audiences if it appears from the character of the material or the circumstances of its dissemination to be especially designed for or directed to such children or audiences.(e) It shall be unlawful for any person, firm or corporation to knowingly and intentionally create, buy, procure or possess obscene material with the purpose and intent of disseminating it unlawfully.

(f) It shall be unlawful for a person, firm or corporation to advertise or otherwise promote the sale of material represented or held out by said person, firm or corporation as obscene.

(g) Violation of this section is a Class I felony.
(h) Obscene material disseminated, procured, or promoted in violation of this section is contraband.

(i) Nothing in this section shall be deemed to preempt local government regulation of the location or operation of sexually oriented businesses to the extent consistent with the constitutional protection afforded free speech. (1971, c. 405, s. 1; 1973, c. 1434, s. 1; 1985, c. 703, s. 1; 1993, c. 539, s. 1194; 1994, Ex. Sess., c. 24, s. 14©; 1998‑46, s. 2.)

So glad you aren't a lawyer as none of this applies. He was charged with two misdemeanors and no matter how much you thump your bible or cry "child mind rape!" it won't have an effect. Thank goodness.

(11-07-2011 01:58 PM)gdunn Wrote:  

(11-07-2011 01:56 PM)GrayBeard Wrote:  

(11-07-2011 01:55 PM)gdunn Wrote:  I think they should've just taken him straight from the game to one of Greenville's gay clubs and tossed him in as punishment.

Does Greenville have a gay club?


I still think they should have tased him.

I thought all your clubs were gay

You seem to be the expert then......

(11-05-2011 10:36 PM)Topcard91 Wrote:  It was incredibly offensive and in no way funny. It was military appreciation day and while they were honoring the leaders of all the branches in attendance for the decades of service this fool ran onto the field directly behind them. What is even more sadening is all the people cheering for this "adult" male willfully and intentionally exposing his genitals to thousands of underage kids. Everything was very visible and my 8 year old daughter saw this.

We spoke to a lawyer friend who also saw this and said that the only real issue would be if it was sexual in nature. The hip thrust would ceratainly be hard to deny as sexually suggestive. I hope beyond the criminal offenses he is also brought up on Civil charges.

Question for you,

When the guy ran out on the field naked, did you try to cover your 8 year old daughters eyes or in anyway try to prevent her from seeing it?

(11-07-2011 03:23 PM)PGPirate Wrote:  

(11-07-2011 01:58 PM)gdunn Wrote:  

(11-07-2011 01:56 PM)GrayBeard Wrote:  

(11-07-2011 01:55 PM)gdunn Wrote:  I think they should've just taken him straight from the game to one of Greenville's gay clubs and tossed him in as punishment.

Does Greenville have a gay club?


I still think they should have tased him.

I thought all your clubs were gay

You seem to be the expert then......

No.. Just figured with a mascot like Pervy Pete the Pirate and everyone calling ya'll Butt Pirates, that maybe there was a very liberal side of Greenville an my buddy just kept me on the conservative side when I would visit.

(11-07-2011 01:55 PM)gdunn Wrote:  I think they should've just taken him straight from the game to one of Greenville's gay clubs and tossed him in as punishment.

Shoulda just put him in jail naked. Maybe some other inmates might like that.

(11-05-2011 10:36 PM)Topcard91 Wrote:  It was incredibly offensive and in no way funny. It was military appreciation day and while they were honoring the leaders of all the branches in attendance for the decades of service this fool ran onto the field directly behind them. What is even more sadening is all the people cheering for this "adult" male willfully and intentionally exposing his genitals to thousands of underage kids. Everything was very visible and my 8 year old daughter saw this.

We spoke to a lawyer friend who also saw this and said that the only real issue would be if it was sexual in nature. The hip thrust would ceratainly be hard to deny as sexually suggestive. I hope beyond the criminal offenses he is also brought up on Civil charges.

Man you need to get a grip. He was a streaker, not a rapist, pedifile or sex offender. Sure what he did was uncalled for, but it certainly doesn't constitute anything more than being young and stupid.

And BTW I have a 10 year old daughter who was also at the game. Being in the middle of the field he was so far away from the fans that you couldn't really see anything.

(11-07-2011 03:34 PM)MasMack Wrote:  

(11-05-2011 10:36 PM)Topcard91 Wrote:  It was incredibly offensive and in no way funny. It was military appreciation day and while they were honoring the leaders of all the branches in attendance for the decades of service this fool ran onto the field directly behind them. What is even more sadening is all the people cheering for this "adult" male willfully and intentionally exposing his genitals to thousands of underage kids. Everything was very visible and my 8 year old daughter saw this.

We spoke to a lawyer friend who also saw this and said that the only real issue would be if it was sexual in nature. The hip thrust would ceratainly be hard to deny as sexually suggestive. I hope beyond the criminal offenses he is also brought up on Civil charges.

Question for you,

When the guy ran out on the field naked, did you try to cover your 8 year old daughters eyes or in anyway try to prevent her from seeing it?

Ofcourse not. Topcard probably wasnt even at the game. just another idiot trying to make a buck over frivolous lawsuits that tie up our court system. What a joke.