BTW, I'm behind you guys. I'm manning the afterhours helpdesk and have had 4 calls in the past 3 hours. I have it DVR'd.

(08-11-2011 08:36 PM)georgia_tech_swagger Wrote:  Question distribution:
- Pawlenty: 12+
- Bachmann: 15+
- Paul: 10
- Romney: 9
- Santorum: 9
- Huntsman: 9 (maybe one more)
- Cain: 8
- Newt: 7

Final count.

Newt got screwed, Cain got screwed, and Pawlenty and Bachmann got handjobs.

Now -- who will the talking heads claim won overwhelmingly? I said coming in they'd be all over Huntsman. I don't know if I disagree with that yet.

BTW, Paul's "Iran can have Nukes if they want them" is why he will NEVER be elected, GTS. As I said, I support 80% of his stances. It's the other 20% that makes me think he has mental issues.

(08-11-2011 09:58 PM)georgia_tech_swagger Wrote:  Now -- who will the talking heads claim won overwhelmingly? I said coming in they'd be all over Huntsman. I don't know if I disagree with that yet.

Honestly I think the theme will be there was no clear winner, they all looked bad.

(08-11-2011 09:58 PM)Rebel Wrote:  BTW, I'm behind you guys. I'm manning the afterhours helpdesk and have had 4 calls in the past 3 hours. I have it DVR'd.

Prepare to see Cain get the Ron Paul treatment by Faux. You got bad juju by making fun of me earlier today when I pointed out how Faux treats Ron like crap.

Actually I revise that, I think they'll play up Huntsman since he's closest to "moderate." The media love "moderates."

JMO.....I rank the players tonight.

1...Newt
2...Paul
3...Huntsman
4...Cain
5...Mitt
6...Bachman
7...Santorum

http://www.topix.com/issue/fox/gop-debate-aug11

Paul killing it ... awlll yea.

Here we go Luntz to deliver the marching orders.

Frank Luntz is not attractive.

1. Newt and Ron
2. Santorum
3. Cain
4. everyone else

That's ANOTHER f'n thing, GTS. Terrorists deserve Constitutional rights? Man, **** Paul. We didn't give German saboteurs rights, because they didn't fall under the Constitution. American citizens? Fine. Foreign terrorists brought here? **** him.

Frank Luntz reveals the marching orders: everybody give Romney a handjob, and Pawlenty is done.

Sorry GTS, Paul will never get the primary. Never.

Luntz and Trippi both saying Newt won.

God I hate Luntz and the neocons he searches the world for to put in his room.

(08-11-2011 10:06 PM)Ninerfan1 Wrote:  Luntz and Trippi both saying Newt won.

They're both saying Newt had the best lines, but lost. Luntz's exact words were "Romney was very Presidential."

THERE WAS AL QAEDA IN IRAQ, YOU OLD FOOL!

Actually, let me give you FOX NEWS polls for the winner of tonight's debate:

1,909
Active Cities

4,664
Total Votes

National Vote
Paul 1813
Gingrich 907
Cain 546
Bachmann 483
Romney 479
Santorum 233
Huntsman 120
Pawlenty 83

(08-11-2011 10:07 PM)Rebel Wrote:  THERE WAS AL QAEDA IN IRAQ, YOU OLD FOOL!

After we got there, yea.

(08-11-2011 10:07 PM)georgia_tech_swagger Wrote:  

(08-11-2011 10:06 PM)Ninerfan1 Wrote:  Luntz and Trippi both saying Newt won.

They're both saying Newt had the best lines, but lost. Luntz's exact words were "Romney was very Presidential."

Actually, what he said before that was "Newt won the battle, Romney won the war." Meaning Newt won the debate but Romney came out unscathed, which was winning the war as the front runner.