Rebel
Unregistered
|
Was this partisanship, Dims?
|
|
07-18-2011 04:01 PM |
|
MileHighBronco
Legend
Posts: 34,345
Joined: Mar 2005
Reputation: 1732
I Root For: Broncos
Location: Forgotten Time Zone
|
RE: Was this partisanship, Dims?
[/crickets]
Just an inconvenient fact.
|
|
07-18-2011 04:25 PM |
|
SuperFlyBCat
Banned
Posts: 49,583
Joined: Mar 2005
I Root For: America and UC
Location: Cincinnati
|
RE: Was this partisanship, Dims?
|
|
07-18-2011 04:29 PM |
|
Rebel
Unregistered
|
RE: Was this partisanship, Dims?
YO FOOLS!
|
|
07-18-2011 09:35 PM |
|
Paul M
American-American
Posts: 21,196
Joined: May 2008
Reputation: 649
I Root For: OU
Location: Next to Boomer
|
RE: Was this partisanship, Dims?
That goes against the narrative.
|
|
07-18-2011 09:41 PM |
|
Rebel
Unregistered
|
RE: Was this partisanship, Dims?
YO!
|
|
07-18-2011 11:05 PM |
|
SumOfAllFears
Grim Reaper of Misguided Liberal Souls
Posts: 18,213
Joined: Nov 2008
Reputation: 58
I Root For: America
Location:
|
RE: Was this partisanship, Dims?
Nice
|
|
07-19-2011 12:11 AM |
|
Mr. Peanut
Banned
Posts: 3,233
Joined: Jan 2011
I Root For: American Worker
Location:
|
RE: Was this partisanship, Dims?
How about 02, 03, 04, & 07?
|
|
07-19-2011 05:39 AM |
|
Paul M
American-American
Posts: 21,196
Joined: May 2008
Reputation: 649
I Root For: OU
Location: Next to Boomer
|
RE: Was this partisanship, Dims?
(07-19-2011 05:39 AM)Mr. Peanut Wrote: How about 02, 03, 04, & 07?
Still having problems with the simple questions, eh.
|
|
07-19-2011 07:56 AM |
|
Redwingtom
Progressive filth
Posts: 51,857
Joined: Dec 2003
Reputation: 984
I Root For: B-G-S-U !!!!
Location: Soros' Basement
|
RE: Was this partisanship, Dims?
It's mostly always been nothing but partisanship and we all know that. But I don't seem to remember prior negotiations being so all or nothing or tied to a bunch of other crap like a balanced budget amendment. In most cases I believe the votes were already there...it was just a vote only on the debt ceiling...and a total party opposition was purely political as the measure was passing regardless.
|
|
07-19-2011 08:36 AM |
|
Mr. Peanut
Banned
Posts: 3,233
Joined: Jan 2011
I Root For: American Worker
Location:
|
RE: Was this partisanship, Dims?
(07-19-2011 07:56 AM)Paul M Wrote: (07-19-2011 05:39 AM)Mr. Peanut Wrote: How about 02, 03, 04, & 07?
Still having problems with the simple questions, eh.
Oh no. This was pure partisan hackery. The Democrats had two super majorities and the Whitehouse and did nothing.
|
|
07-19-2011 10:31 AM |
|
Owl 69/70/75
Just an old rugby coach
Posts: 80,842
Joined: Sep 2005
Reputation: 3211
I Root For: RiceBathChelsea
Location: Montgomery, TX
|
RE: Was this partisanship, Dims?
(07-19-2011 10:31 AM)Mr. Peanut Wrote: (07-19-2011 07:56 AM)Paul M Wrote: (07-19-2011 05:39 AM)Mr. Peanut Wrote: How about 02, 03, 04, & 07?
Still having problems with the simple questions, eh.
Oh no. This was pure partisan hackery. The Democrats had two super majorities and the Whitehouse and did nothing.
I think you meant to say republicans instead of democrats. In any event, there were no supermajorities in any of those years, at least not in the Senate where it matters most. Obama and the democrats had the only true supermajority in 2009 and part of 2010.
|
|
07-19-2011 11:58 AM |
|
SumOfAllFears
Grim Reaper of Misguided Liberal Souls
Posts: 18,213
Joined: Nov 2008
Reputation: 58
I Root For: America
Location:
|
RE: Was this partisanship, Dims?
(07-19-2011 08:36 AM)Redwingtom Wrote: It's mostly always been nothing but partisanship and we all know that. But I don't seem to remember prior negotiations being so all or nothing or tied to a bunch of other crap like a balanced budget amendment. In most cases I believe the votes were already there...it was just a vote only on the debt ceiling...and a total party opposition was purely political as the measure was passing regardless.
So, a balanced budget amendment is crap? You are soooo lost.
|
|
07-19-2011 12:09 PM |
|
Mr. Peanut
Banned
Posts: 3,233
Joined: Jan 2011
I Root For: American Worker
Location:
|
RE: Was this partisanship, Dims?
(07-19-2011 11:58 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote: (07-19-2011 10:31 AM)Mr. Peanut Wrote: (07-19-2011 07:56 AM)Paul M Wrote: (07-19-2011 05:39 AM)Mr. Peanut Wrote: How about 02, 03, 04, & 07?
Still having problems with the simple questions, eh.
Oh no. This was pure partisan hackery. The Democrats had two super majorities and the Whitehouse and did nothing.
I think you meant to say republicans instead of democrats. In any event, there were no supermajorities in any of those years, at least not in the Senate where it matters most. Obama and the democrats had the only true supermajority in 2009 and part of 2010.
Sorry for the confusion in 08-09 the Dems were in the catbird seat with a mandate for change but squandered that. I am fully aware the Democrats suck and am always amazed that the GOP rank and file still seemingly believe the rhetoric
|
|
07-19-2011 12:15 PM |
|
SumOfAllFears
Grim Reaper of Misguided Liberal Souls
Posts: 18,213
Joined: Nov 2008
Reputation: 58
I Root For: America
Location:
|
RE: Was this partisanship, Dims?
(07-19-2011 12:15 PM)Mr. Peanut Wrote: Sorry for the confusion in 08-09 the Dems were in the catbird seat with a mandate for change but squandered that. I am fully aware the Democrats suck and am always amazed that the GOP rank and file still seemingly believe the rhetoric
Yes, PeaWee you are confused now. You were confused in the past and your confusion extends far into the future with no end in sight. Your life is chaos and confusion as exemplified by your posts.
|
|
07-19-2011 12:31 PM |
|
Mr. Peanut
Banned
Posts: 3,233
Joined: Jan 2011
I Root For: American Worker
Location:
|
RE: Was this partisanship, Dims?
(07-19-2011 12:31 PM)SumOfAllFears Wrote: (07-19-2011 12:15 PM)Mr. Peanut Wrote: Sorry for the confusion in 08-09 the Dems were in the catbird seat with a mandate for change but squandered that. I am fully aware the Democrats suck and am always amazed that the GOP rank and file still seemingly believe the rhetoric
Yes, PeaWee you are confused now. You were confused in the past and your confusion extends far into the future with no end in sight. Your life is chaos and confusion as exemplified by your posts.
I am focused like a Laser beam on keeping conservatism from running amuck and destroying America.
|
|
07-19-2011 12:35 PM |
|
SumOfAllFears
Grim Reaper of Misguided Liberal Souls
Posts: 18,213
Joined: Nov 2008
Reputation: 58
I Root For: America
Location:
|
RE: Was this partisanship, Dims?
(07-19-2011 12:35 PM)Mr. Peanut Wrote: (07-19-2011 12:31 PM)SumOfAllFears Wrote: (07-19-2011 12:15 PM)Mr. Peanut Wrote: Sorry for the confusion in 08-09 the Dems were in the catbird seat with a mandate for change but squandered that. I am fully aware the Democrats suck and am always amazed that the GOP rank and file still seemingly believe the rhetoric
Yes, PeaWee you are confused now. You were confused in the past and your confusion extends far into the future with no end in sight. Your life is chaos and confusion as exemplified by your posts.
I am focused like a Laser beam on keeping conservatism from running amuck and destroying America.
Really, like Obabba is laser beam focused on jobs?
|
|
07-19-2011 12:36 PM |
|
Mr. Peanut
Banned
Posts: 3,233
Joined: Jan 2011
I Root For: American Worker
Location:
|
RE: Was this partisanship, Dims?
(07-19-2011 12:36 PM)SumOfAllFears Wrote: (07-19-2011 12:35 PM)Mr. Peanut Wrote: (07-19-2011 12:31 PM)SumOfAllFears Wrote: (07-19-2011 12:15 PM)Mr. Peanut Wrote: Sorry for the confusion in 08-09 the Dems were in the catbird seat with a mandate for change but squandered that. I am fully aware the Democrats suck and am always amazed that the GOP rank and file still seemingly believe the rhetoric
Yes, PeaWee you are confused now. You were confused in the past and your confusion extends far into the future with no end in sight. Your life is chaos and confusion as exemplified by your posts.
I am focused like a Laser beam on keeping conservatism from running amuck and destroying America.
Really, like Obabba is laser beam focused on jobs?
Much more focused than that.
|
|
07-19-2011 12:38 PM |
|
SuperFlyBCat
Banned
Posts: 49,583
Joined: Mar 2005
I Root For: America and UC
Location: Cincinnati
|
RE: Was this partisanship, Dims?
(07-19-2011 12:38 PM)Mr. Peanut Wrote: (07-19-2011 12:36 PM)SumOfAllFears Wrote: (07-19-2011 12:35 PM)Mr. Peanut Wrote: (07-19-2011 12:31 PM)SumOfAllFears Wrote: (07-19-2011 12:15 PM)Mr. Peanut Wrote: Sorry for the confusion in 08-09 the Dems were in the catbird seat with a mandate for change but squandered that. I am fully aware the Democrats suck and am always amazed that the GOP rank and file still seemingly believe the rhetoric
Yes, PeaWee you are confused now. You were confused in the past and your confusion extends far into the future with no end in sight. Your life is chaos and confusion as exemplified by your posts.
I am focused like a Laser beam on keeping conservatism from running amuck and destroying America.
Really, like Obabba is laser beam focused on jobs?
Much more focused than that.
What is your plan?
|
|
07-19-2011 12:52 PM |
|
Paul M
American-American
Posts: 21,196
Joined: May 2008
Reputation: 649
I Root For: OU
Location: Next to Boomer
|
RE: Was this partisanship, Dims?
(07-19-2011 12:52 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote: (07-19-2011 12:38 PM)Mr. Peanut Wrote: (07-19-2011 12:36 PM)SumOfAllFears Wrote: (07-19-2011 12:35 PM)Mr. Peanut Wrote: (07-19-2011 12:31 PM)SumOfAllFears Wrote: Yes, PeaWee you are confused now. You were confused in the past and your confusion extends far into the future with no end in sight. Your life is chaos and confusion as exemplified by your posts.
I am focused like a Laser beam on keeping conservatism from running amuck and destroying America.
Really, like Obabba is laser beam focused on jobs?
Much more focused than that.
What is your plan?
To vote for Romney, Paul or the communist candidate.
|
|
07-19-2011 01:00 PM |
|