What is missing from this picture?



MSNBC: We saw what Faux did in '08, and think it was brilliant.

Here's a hint: It should have at least $4.5 million to the right of it.

Either numbers for Palin or Bachman, I presume.

(07-06-2011 07:50 PM)miko33 Wrote:  Either numbers for Palin or Bachman, I presume.

Nope.

Hint: It's gts posting.

(07-06-2011 07:54 PM)Paul M Wrote:  

(07-06-2011 07:50 PM)miko33 Wrote:  Either numbers for Palin or Bachman, I presume.

Nope.

Hint: It's gts posting.

I forgot about "The REVolution"

In fairness, gts does have a legit point.

Agree.

Not sure...but he should be listed. As should Bachmann.

The Politico story (which I assume the graphic is sourced to) does not mention Ron Paul at all, here.

But TheHill story does mention Paul's total here.

Of course I have no idea why MSNBC or Morning Joe would have any sort of agenda against Paul, he has no shot at winning IMHO. He is also one of the few who always seems to at least appear on the MSNBC shows...and of course Joe is supposedly a Republican.

Paul doesn't stand a chance, but neither do some of those other losers listed there. So I agree that he should be part of the graphic.

I sympathize with Ron Paul and I like a number of his positions on politics. But the reality is he will never win the primary. I'm completely content to see him run in order to influence the primaries, but he sealed his fate when he said he would not have gone after Bin Laden. Paul had legitimate arguments to not take action; however, the citizens will not publicly support a candidate who would not have "taken the shot" to remove Bin Laden.

I too like Paul, but he will likely never get my vote as long as he is affiliated with the Republican party.

(07-07-2011 08:35 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  I too like Paul, but he will likely never get my vote as long as he is affiliated with the Republican party.

Right, because the letter in parentheses after their name is MUCH more important than their policies and principles. That might be the most ignorant thing I've ever seen posted on this board.

It don't get it. What's up with Ron Paul always talking about the Mitsubishi Evolution?

(07-07-2011 09:32 AM)BlazerFan11 Wrote:  

(07-07-2011 08:35 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  I too like Paul, but he will likely never get my vote as long as he is affiliated with the Republican party.

Right, because the letter in parentheses after their name is MUCH more important than their policies and principles. That might be the most ignorant thing I've ever seen posted on this board.

We ought to keep a list.

(07-07-2011 10:50 AM)DrTorch Wrote:  

(07-07-2011 09:32 AM)BlazerFan11 Wrote:  

(07-07-2011 08:35 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  I too like Paul, but he will likely never get my vote as long as he is affiliated with the Republican party.

Right, because the letter in parentheses after their name is MUCH more important than their policies and principles. That might be the most ignorant thing I've ever seen posted on this board.

We ought to keep a list.

No need. We can always just use the search function to find your posts.

Oh noes....its a Ronspiracy!

(07-07-2011 08:35 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  I too like Paul, but he will likely never get my vote as long as he is affiliated with the Republican party.

So ( R)evolution, no.
(D)evolution, yes.

(07-07-2011 11:08 AM)UM2001GRAD Wrote:  

(07-07-2011 10:50 AM)DrTorch Wrote:  

(07-07-2011 09:32 AM)BlazerFan11 Wrote:  

(07-07-2011 08:35 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  I too like Paul, but he will likely never get my vote as long as he is affiliated with the Republican party.

Right, because the letter in parentheses after their name is MUCH more important than their policies and principles. That might be the most ignorant thing I've ever seen posted on this board.

We ought to keep a list.

No need. We can always just use the search function to find your posts.

But only once every 30 seconds...not very efficient. Then again, you're pro-big gov't, so you hate efficiency anyways.

(07-07-2011 08:26 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Of course I have no idea why MSNBC or Morning Joe would have any sort of agenda against Paul, he has no shot at winning IMHO. He is also one of the few who always seems to at least appear on the MSNBC shows...and of course Joe is supposedly a Republican.

From what I remember from back when I had a backwards schedule, Morning Joe was a pretty well balanced commentary show. A lot of news, in a little time, presented in an entertaining format with lots of interesting "fwiw" opinions. I definitely enjoyed it.

(07-07-2011 01:11 PM)Raider_ATO Wrote:  

(07-07-2011 08:26 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Of course I have no idea why MSNBC or Morning Joe would have any sort of agenda against Paul, he has no shot at winning IMHO. He is also one of the few who always seems to at least appear on the MSNBC shows...and of course Joe is supposedly a Republican.

From what I remember from back when I had a backwards schedule, Morning Joe was a pretty well balanced commentary show. A lot of news, in a little time, presented in an entertaining format with lots of interesting "fwiw" opinions. I definitely enjoyed it.

I like Morning Joe. I watch it just about every morning and thats about all i watch on the waste of a channel.