Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
Obama Pushes $600 Billion in New Taxes in Debt Talks
Author Message
SumOfAllFears Offline
Grim Reaper of Misguided Liberal Souls
*

Posts: 18,213
Joined: Nov 2008
Reputation: 58
I Root For: America
Location:
Post: #1
Obama Pushes $600 Billion in New Taxes in Debt Talks
Guess he forgot about his 2011 budget no one else seemed to like, since he did not get a single voie.

Obama Pushes $600 Billion in New Taxes in Debt Talks


By Martin Gould Monday, 27 Jun 2011 05:30 PM

President Barack Obama threw the talks on the debt ceiling crisis into turmoil on Monday afternoon by proposing a $600 billion tax hike before even meeting with Republican Senate leader Mitch McConnell.

Just as Democrats and Republicans seemed to be inching toward an agreement that would stave off the prospect of a default on the nation’s debts, Obama introduced a measure that is sure to have the GOP howling in opposition.

The new wrench in the works drew scorn from conservatives.

"The Democrats’ insistence on touting their desire to 'end tax breaks to oil and gas companies' is becoming quite tiresome," wrote Andrew Stiles at the National Review's website. "It’s basically their only specific new tax proposal, but would amount to saving of just $21 billion over a decade. That’s a long way to $600 billion."

Other conservatives ridiculed the idea that the White House could be taking such a proposal seriously.

"The White House has proposed raising about $600 billion in new tax revenue, including ending subsidies to oil and gas companies, an idea that failed in the Senate," wrote Bryan Preston at the conservative PJ Tattler blog on Pajamas Media.

"It failed in a Democrat-controlled Senate, and with good reason: It’s a terrible idea. I was at first tempted to post a hoary old Admiral Ackbar – “It’s a trap!” graphic on this story, but it doesn’t really merit that," Preston continued. "Calling it a trap at least implies that the GOP might fall for it. Honestly, I don’t see that happening. So if it’s not a trap, what is this? For one thing, it’s the Democrats’ answer to everything. For another, it’s class warfare, which is also the Democrats’ answer to everything."

The move came as Republicans signaled that they were finally prepared to talk about cuts to military spending, one of the major roadblocks to agreement.

“When we say everything is on the table, that’s what we mean,” House Majority Whip Kevin McCarthy said before Obama’s announcement.

White House Press Secretary Jay Carney announced the tax proposals after Obama met Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid on Monday morning. He is due to meet McConnell later in the day in a bid to find “common ground.” It is the first time the president has personally gotten involved in the debt ceiling talks.

Carney said the president is still hopeful that the two sides can come to an agreement but said Republicans have to realize that some taxes must go up. "It's the only way to get it done," Carney said.

Among Obama’s proposals are an end to tax breaks for big companies and the richest and taxing equity and hedge fund managers on income tax rates rather than capital gains tax rates.

Other changes include changing depreciation rules on corporate jets, limiting itemized deductions for the wealthy and repealing a tax benefit that companies use for inventory accounting.

Earlier the Republicans were making it clear that such tax increases are the only point on which there can be no negotiation, so Obama’s move seems almost assured to stall the talks once more. McConnell said, "It is my hope that the president will take those off the table today so that we can have a serious discussion about our country's economic future."

The president has just five weeks to bring the two sides to an agreement that will allow the country to raise the $14.3 trillion ceiling before August 2 or risk defaulting on its debts. Last week, bipartisan talks led by Vice President Joe Biden fell apart when the GOP representatives walked out.

House Speaker John Boehner insisted the increase in the limit must be offset with spending cuts without any tax hikes.

"These are the realities of the situation," he said. "If the president and his allies want the debt limit increased, it is only going to happen via a measure that meets these tests."

And McConnell added, “Throwing more tax revenue into the mix is not going to produce a desirable result, and it won't pass. Putting aside that Republicans don't like to raise taxes, Democrats don't either."

For the Democrats, Carney said, "We won't support an approach that gives millionaires and billionaires $200,000 tax cuts annually while 33 seniors pay for that with $6,000 per person increase in their Medicare costs.”

Biden had been leading the talks that had involved Rep. Eric Cantor and Sen. Jon Kyl on the GOP side and Sens. Max Baucus and Daniel Inouye and Reps. James Clyburn and Chris Van Holland for the Democrats. But they came to a screeching halt when Cantor walked out on Thursday and Kyl followed.

Carney said the involvement of the president, and the leaders of the two parties in both the Senate and the House had always been inevitable. "It is not as though this negotiating group could simply declare into law what they agreed on,” he said. “The process was always going to have to proceed out of the negotiating room and move forward with the engagement of the speaker, Senate leaders, the House minority leader, the president, et cetera."

Before the president’s statement, both sides seemed to be softening. Republicans had started to talk of military cuts in recent days, especially as troops prepare to leave both Afghanistan and Iraq.

Previously defense spending had been seen as non-negotiable within the GOP. But news stories that have revealed the military is spending $20 billion a year in air conditioning costs alone have suggested there is room for cuts at the Pentagon.

Freshman GOP Rep. Adam Kinzinger of Illinois, an active-duty Air National Guardsman who flew missions in Iraq, acknowledged in the Washington Post that defense spending is “a pillar of Republican strength.” But he added, “Look, I know there are sacred cows, but we cannot afford them anymore,”

And another Republican, Rep. Robert Hurt of Virginia added, “I would never support anything that would reduce the safety of the troops on the ground. But bureaucracy is bureaucracy, and there are ways to get at it, even in the Pentagon.”

The Democrats moved too. Before he left the talks, Cantor had even praised them for finding $2 trillion in cuts over 10 years.

Now the prospect of any agreement leaves Boehner with the most to lose. Many pundits believe Cantor’s decision to quit the talks was a politically motivated bid to score points with tea party members and other conservatives in the GOP.

“The speaker is now politically exposed to fire from every direction as he goes into the final phase of negotiations with President Obama and the Democrats,” Fox News analyst Juan Williams wrote in The Hill.

Williams had harsh words for Cantor, saying he “threw Boehner under the bus,” by leaving the talks and telling The Wall Street Journal before informing leaders of his own party. “Now there is a new and profoundly rude way to announce a political divorce,” wrote Williams.

“The bottom line is that Cantor’s decision to abdicate any pretense of being a political leader set a trap for Boehner.”

The political implications are also huge for Obama, who won’t want to go into next year’s election as the president who allowed the country to default.

A Gallup poll last week showed his approval rating has slumped to 45 percent, trailing his disapproval rating of 48 percent. A poll from The Hill earlier this month showed 48 percent of likely voters believe he has hurt the economy, and only 41 percent think he’s helped it.


Newsmax. All rights reserved.
(This post was last modified: 06-27-2011 11:54 PM by SumOfAllFears.)
06-27-2011 11:53 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


cb4029 Offline
The spoon that stirs the pot.
*

Posts: 18,793
Joined: Jun 2007
Reputation: 353
I Root For: Deez Nuts
Location: B'ham

Donators
Post: #2
RE: Obama Pushes $600 Billion in New Taxes in Debt Talks
As long as he cuts spending by the same amount, I'm cool. 05-stirthepot
06-28-2011 09:17 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
HuskieFan84 Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 9,919
Joined: Dec 2004
Reputation: 53
I Root For: NIU, White Sox
Location:
Post: #3
RE: Obama Pushes $600 Billion in New Taxes in Debt Talks
Well lowering taxes has clearly helped the economy these last few years. So I can see why you wouldn't want to raise taxes.
06-28-2011 09:39 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
SuperFlyBCat Offline
Banned

Posts: 49,583
Joined: Mar 2005
I Root For: America and UC
Location: Cincinnati
Post: #4
RE: Obama Pushes $600 Billion in New Taxes in Debt Talks
(06-28-2011 09:39 AM)HuskieFan84 Wrote:  Well lowering taxes has clearly helped the economy these last few years. So I can see why you wouldn't want to raise taxes.

Do you want to pay more taxes? Do you make enough money that you pay federal income taxes?
06-28-2011 09:42 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Paul M Offline
American-American
*

Posts: 21,196
Joined: May 2008
Reputation: 649
I Root For: OU
Location: Next to Boomer
Post: #5
RE: Obama Pushes $600 Billion in New Taxes in Debt Talks
(06-28-2011 09:39 AM)HuskieFan84 Wrote:  Well lowering taxes has clearly helped the economy these last few years. So I can see why you wouldn't want to raise taxes.

You know spending is the problem and yet you chose to type this drivel.
06-28-2011 09:47 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
HuskieFan84 Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 9,919
Joined: Dec 2004
Reputation: 53
I Root For: NIU, White Sox
Location:
Post: #6
RE: Obama Pushes $600 Billion in New Taxes in Debt Talks
Are you serious? **** off. Yes I make enough to pay federal income taxes.

If I can make 100K and pay 33% of that to taxes, or make 120K and pay 35% of that to taxes, I'll take the second option. I'm better off if the economy as a whole is doing better. And I've yet to see any evidence the extreme, out of this world, mind blowing high tax rates of the Clinton era were killing the economy, or any evidence that lowering taxes during the Bush era was helping anything. When the middle class and lower class are doing better, I do better, it's not a hard question for me.

If you're asking if I'm in the top 1%.. no. Yeah, it'd be nice if I was, but I'm not. But I certainly pay taxes, and as a member of what I'd consider to be the middle class, I'm better off if the economy as a whole is doing well. The trickle down effect is a myth.


Paul you say spending is the problem, yet you support the party that started a trillion dollar war in Iraq for no reason. You support the party that wastes billion on a drug war that accomplishes nothing. You support a party that would rather waste billions on anti-immigration laws that don't work instead receiving tax money from those people. How can I take you seriously? OOH lets cut Planned Parenthood. Yeah.. that's really worth my ******* time. Let's make a big deal about public radio spending. Because they're just raking in trillions from tax payers. It's a joke Paul. Conservatives we're in power for a fairly long time. And the government grew, and grew by a ton. Why would I believe you'd actually make legitimate cuts?

Let me know when you're willing to cut military spending and stop wasting money on things like the war on drugs, that benefits no one, and I'll listen to conservatives when it comes to this spending cuts. Until then it's just a lot of talk.
(This post was last modified: 06-28-2011 09:55 AM by HuskieFan84.)
06-28-2011 09:51 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


Paul M Offline
American-American
*

Posts: 21,196
Joined: May 2008
Reputation: 649
I Root For: OU
Location: Next to Boomer
Post: #7
RE: Obama Pushes $600 Billion in New Taxes in Debt Talks
Cut military spending. There is waste everywhere. To make a real difference though, cuts have to be made where it would have any meaningful effect. Social entitlements.

Let me know when you're willing to cut and I'll take liberals seriously.
(This post was last modified: 06-28-2011 10:02 AM by Paul M.)
06-28-2011 10:00 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
TheDancinMonarch Offline
All American
*

Posts: 4,643
Joined: Jun 2009
Reputation: 157
I Root For: Old Dominion
Location: Norfolk, VA
Post: #8
RE: Obama Pushes $600 Billion in New Taxes in Debt Talks
We are running a $1,600,000,000,000 deficit, this year. Let's say we raise taxes by $600,000,000,000. That leaves a $1,000,000,000,000 debt, this year. So we cut spending by $600,000,000,000, this year. That will still leave $400,000,000,000 deficit, this year. Whoopee!! Problem solved. Hardly. Particularly considering the damage to the economy because of the huge tax increase.

I know that this year (fiscal) has only 3 months left but I am using it just as an example.

By the way. I like all of the zeros because I think it gives a better idea of the scope of the problem.
06-28-2011 10:00 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
SuperFlyBCat Offline
Banned

Posts: 49,583
Joined: Mar 2005
I Root For: America and UC
Location: Cincinnati
Post: #9
RE: Obama Pushes $600 Billion in New Taxes in Debt Talks
Wasteful and bloated government programs and spending, entitlement programs, just throw darts to cut spending..............and you want to cut the only area that keeps us safe, the Military. Is that because the Military isn't a bastion for the professional left?

We all know spending is the problem. You could tax those over $250,000 at 100% at that would not do anything. Spending is the problem.
(This post was last modified: 06-28-2011 10:36 AM by SuperFlyBCat.)
06-28-2011 10:02 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
miko33 Offline
Defender of Honesty and Integrity
*

Posts: 13,157
Joined: Mar 2010
Reputation: 859
I Root For: Alma Mater
Location:
Post: #10
RE: Obama Pushes $600 Billion in New Taxes in Debt Talks
(This post was last modified: 06-28-2011 10:20 AM by miko33.)
06-28-2011 10:16 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
cb4029 Offline
The spoon that stirs the pot.
*

Posts: 18,793
Joined: Jun 2007
Reputation: 353
I Root For: Deez Nuts
Location: B'ham

Donators
Post: #11
RE: Obama Pushes $600 Billion in New Taxes in Debt Talks
(06-28-2011 10:02 AM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  Wasteful and bloated government programs and spending, entitlement programs, just throw darts to cut spending..............and you want to cut the only area that keeps us safe, the Military. Is that because the Military isn't a bastion for the professional left?

You wanna know what would keep us safe.............stop sticking our nose in everyone else's business. 05-stirthepot
06-28-2011 10:29 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


SuperFlyBCat Offline
Banned

Posts: 49,583
Joined: Mar 2005
I Root For: America and UC
Location: Cincinnati
Post: #12
RE: Obama Pushes $600 Billion in New Taxes in Debt Talks
(06-28-2011 10:29 AM)cb4029 Wrote:  
(06-28-2011 10:02 AM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  Wasteful and bloated government programs and spending, entitlement programs, just throw darts to cut spending..............and you want to cut the only area that keeps us safe, the Military. Is that because the Military isn't a bastion for the professional left?

You wanna know what would keep us safe.............stop sticking our nose in everyone else's business. 05-stirthepot

Agreed 100%, especially with boots on the ground without an invitation from that Country. We do need bases around the globe and we need to be the best at gathering intel though.
06-28-2011 10:35 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
SumOfAllFears Offline
Grim Reaper of Misguided Liberal Souls
*

Posts: 18,213
Joined: Nov 2008
Reputation: 58
I Root For: America
Location:
Post: #13
RE: Obama Pushes $600 Billion in New Taxes in Debt Talks
I say we do not raise the debt ceiling until a plan is in place to start to PAY DOWN THE DEBT. We could save 20% to 30% by going back to 2008 gov't spending levels.
06-28-2011 10:38 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
RobertN Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 35,485
Joined: Jan 2003
Reputation: 95
I Root For: THE NIU Huskies
Location: Wayne's World
Post: #14
RE: Obama Pushes $600 Billion in New Taxes in Debt Talks
(06-28-2011 10:38 AM)SumOfAllFears Wrote:  I say we do not raise the debt ceiling until a plan is in place to start to PAY DOWN THE DEBT. We could save 20% to 30% by going back to 2008 gov't spending levels.
Is that what WND told you to say?
06-28-2011 10:59 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Mr. Peanut Offline
Banned

Posts: 3,233
Joined: Jan 2011
I Root For: American Worker
Location:
Post: #15
RE: Obama Pushes $600 Billion in New Taxes in Debt Talks
(06-28-2011 10:59 AM)RobertN Wrote:  
(06-28-2011 10:38 AM)SumOfAllFears Wrote:  I say we do not raise the debt ceiling until a plan is in place to start to PAY DOWN THE DEBT. We could save 20% to 30% by going back to 2008 gov't spending levels.
Is that what WND told you to say?
I'm pretty sure it was Rush 03-lmfao
06-28-2011 11:07 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
SumOfAllFears Offline
Grim Reaper of Misguided Liberal Souls
*

Posts: 18,213
Joined: Nov 2008
Reputation: 58
I Root For: America
Location:
Post: #16
RE: Obama Pushes $600 Billion in New Taxes in Debt Talks
(06-28-2011 10:59 AM)RobertN Wrote:  
(06-28-2011 10:38 AM)SumOfAllFears Wrote:  I say we do not raise the debt ceiling until a plan is in place to start to PAY DOWN THE DEBT. We could save 20% to 30% by going back to 2008 gov't spending levels.
Is that what WND told you to say?

That's what I think needs to happen. If we are not willing to start to pay back what we borrowed then IMO, we are not serious. Everyone here knows you are not serious, just a spend, spend, spend, troll.
06-28-2011 11:09 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


flyingswoosh Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 15,863
Joined: Jul 2003
Reputation: 69
I Root For:
Location:

Crappies
Post: #17
RE: Obama Pushes $600 Billion in New Taxes in Debt Talks
(06-28-2011 11:07 AM)Mr. Peanut Wrote:  
(06-28-2011 10:59 AM)RobertN Wrote:  
(06-28-2011 10:38 AM)SumOfAllFears Wrote:  I say we do not raise the debt ceiling until a plan is in place to start to PAY DOWN THE DEBT. We could save 20% to 30% by going back to 2008 gov't spending levels.
Is that what WND told you to say?
I'm pretty sure it was Rush 03-lmfao

i doubt one person on here listens to Rush. And if more than a couple watch Fox News, i'd be shocked
06-28-2011 11:56 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
SumOfAllFears Offline
Grim Reaper of Misguided Liberal Souls
*

Posts: 18,213
Joined: Nov 2008
Reputation: 58
I Root For: America
Location:
Post: #18
RE: Obama Pushes $600 Billion in New Taxes in Debt Talks
(06-28-2011 11:07 AM)Mr. Peanut Wrote:  
(06-28-2011 10:59 AM)RobertN Wrote:  
(06-28-2011 10:38 AM)SumOfAllFears Wrote:  I say we do not raise the debt ceiling until a plan is in place to start to PAY DOWN THE DEBT. We could save 20% to 30% by going back to 2008 gov't spending levels.
Is that what WND told you to say?
I'm pretty sure it was Rush 03-lmfao

I don't recall anyone else saying it, except me.
06-28-2011 01:08 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
TheDancinMonarch Offline
All American
*

Posts: 4,643
Joined: Jun 2009
Reputation: 157
I Root For: Old Dominion
Location: Norfolk, VA
Post: #19
RE: Obama Pushes $600 Billion in New Taxes in Debt Talks
(06-28-2011 01:08 PM)SumOfAllFears Wrote:  
(06-28-2011 11:07 AM)Mr. Peanut Wrote:  
(06-28-2011 10:59 AM)RobertN Wrote:  
(06-28-2011 10:38 AM)SumOfAllFears Wrote:  I say we do not raise the debt ceiling until a plan is in place to start to PAY DOWN THE DEBT. We could save 20% to 30% by going back to 2008 gov't spending levels.
Is that what WND told you to say?
I'm pretty sure it was Rush 03-lmfao

I don't recall anyone else saying it, except me.

I wish I would have said it!
06-28-2011 01:56 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Bull_In_Exile Offline
Eternal Pessimist
*

Posts: 21,809
Joined: Jun 2009
Reputation: 461
I Root For: The Underdog
Location:
Post: #20
RE: Obama Pushes $600 Billion in New Taxes in Debt Talks
(06-28-2011 09:17 AM)cb4029 Wrote:  As long as he cuts spending by the same amount, I'm cool. 05-stirthepot

You could sell that to conservatives..

If a GOP candidate right now said he wanted to role taxes and spending back to Clinton era levels I would be all over that!

Undo every massive groth of Government that Bush and Obama did and while you're at it throw the left a bone and raise taxes to the 1999 levels.
06-28-2011 02:05 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.