Quote:...South Carolina attorneys filed a counterclaim Friday in Charleston, S.C., federal court against Righthaven that, among other things, accuses Righthaven of violating South Carolina’s Unfair Trade Practices Act when it sued Dana Eiser of Summerville, S.C., after a Denver Post column was posted on her nonprofit website .

Eiser is affiliated with a Tea Party movement group called Lowcountry 9/12 and has a blog at lowcountry912.wordpress.com.

The Sept. 23 column at issue by Post columnist Mike Rosen was called “A letter to the Tea Partyers.”

Eiser also released emails in which an attorney for Righthaven gave Eiser the opportunity to settle by paying Righthaven $15,000. Eiser's attorneys rejected this demand and instead gave Righthaven the chance to settle by paying Eiser $250,000.

http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2011/feb...hthaven-c/

This ought to be interesting.

??? Spammer???

Bad bot!!!

Would be great if they got slapped down by S.C.

Here's another Righthaven lawsuit story.

(04-12-2011 04:19 PM)MileHighBronco Wrote:  Would be great if they got slapped down by S.C.

Here's another Righthaven lawsuit story.

In the Righthaven suit against Brian Hill, WrongHaven failed to mention that the district judge slapped them pretty hard. After all it looks more like extortion than a settlement. This is why lawyers have such a bad image. Scumbag lawyers.