https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/6202...ation/amp/

Sen. Cory Booker (D-N.J.) is set to make two appearances in South Carolina this month as speculation grows surrounding his interest in running for president again in 2028.

Booker’s office announced Thursday he will be making two trips to the Palmetto State in November. His first visit will be to the Sumter County NAACP Freedom Fund Banquet this Friday, during which the senator will deliver remarks. The lawmaker will then travel to Charleston for the NAACP’s annual Freedom Fund Gala on Nov. 20.

Good for Corey Booker. He’ll have tough competition but I wish him the best.

I appreciated his recent remarks on the Senate floor about the college sports bill. It’s a perspective that will affect debate in the House if the bill goes forward there.

Ewww. Booker is awful. Luckily he's got less than zero chance.

(11-06-2026 09:28 AM)b0ndsj0ns Wrote:  Ewww. Booker is awful. Luckily he's got less than zero chance.

Is he going to threaten to punch Vance since Trump won't be running?

(11-06-2026 09:25 AM)Gitanole Wrote:  

Good for Corey Booker. He’ll have tough competition but I wish him the best.

I appreciated his recent remarks on the Senate floor about the college sports bill. It’s a perspective that will affect debate in the House if the bill goes forward there.

I do support him on the college sports bill

(11-06-2026 11:02 AM)No Bull Wrote:  

(11-06-2026 09:25 AM)Gitanole Wrote:  

Good for Corey Booker. He’ll have tough competition but I wish him the best.

I appreciated his recent remarks on the Senate floor about the college sports bill. It’s a perspective that will affect debate in the House if the bill goes forward there.

I do support him on the college sports bill

Same. The college sports bill is amazing. If only they could do stuff like that the rest of the time (that is, doing the right thing) instead of being obstructionists at every turn. (Granted, we had obstructionists in our party, too.)

Corey Booker bears a resemblance to Vin Diesel.

He better worry about keeping his current position. The new wave communists don’t like him much.

At least two dozen Democrats are considering, or being recruited for, a presidential run.

The Hill sees six as having the inside track.
https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/61...-midterms/

Georgia Senator Jon Ossoff tops many lists right now.

(Yesterday 02:54 PM)Gitanole Wrote:  

At least two dozen Democrats are considering, or being recruited for, a presidential run.

The Hill sees six as having the inside track.
https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/61...-midterms/

Georgia Senator Jon Ossoff tops many lists right now.

He's a Jew. Wait until the masses find that out.

(11-06-2026 11:03 AM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  

(11-06-2026 11:02 AM)No Bull Wrote:  

(11-06-2026 09:25 AM)Gitanole Wrote:  

Good for Corey Booker. He’ll have tough competition but I wish him the best.

I appreciated his recent remarks on the Senate floor about the college sports bill. It’s a perspective that will affect debate in the House if the bill goes forward there.

I do support him on the college sports bill

Same. The college sports bill is amazing. If only they could do stuff like that the rest of the time (that is, doing the right thing) instead of being obstructionists at every turn. (Granted, we had obstructionists in our party, too.)

He opposes the bill.

(Yesterday 03:38 PM)wmubroncopilot Wrote:  

(11-06-2026 11:03 AM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  

(11-06-2026 11:02 AM)No Bull Wrote:  

(11-06-2026 09:25 AM)Gitanole Wrote:  

Good for Corey Booker. He’ll have tough competition but I wish him the best.

I appreciated his recent remarks on the Senate floor about the college sports bill. It’s a perspective that will affect debate in the House if the bill goes forward there.

I do support him on the college sports bill

Same. The college sports bill is amazing. If only they could do stuff like that the rest of the time (that is, doing the right thing) instead of being obstructionists at every turn. (Granted, we had obstructionists in our party, too.)

He opposes the bill.

Senator Booker did not support the PCSA because, in his view, it did little to protect college athletes’ rights that they had won in court. He saw it mainly as an effort to claw back many of those rights.

Even so, he’s a pragmatist. When he saw the bill had the support to pass anyway, he proposed a pair of amendments. They enjoyed broad support and came up short by only a few votes. (Rand Paul should do so well. lol)

Both amendments would definitely pass in the next Senate. Some of the senators who voted Nay on them aren’t coming back.

I have a better chance than Booker

Good