The ousted founder of Project Veritas allegedly plays stupid game and now getting stupid prizes


https://apnews.com/article/voucher-votin...51092e7435

Quote:MINNEAPOLIS (AP) — Conservative activists James O’Keefe and Cam Higby were charged Wednesday with unlawful voting and identity theft after a Minnesota prosecutor said they gave false names to poll workers during the state’s primary election. The men recorded the exchanges for a video to expose what they say are vulnerabilities in the state’s voting laws.

Hennepin County Attorney Mary Moriarty announced the felony charges at a news conference. She said O’Keefe, 42, of West Palm Beach, Florida, and Higby, 26, of Covington, Washington, wore costumes and used the names of registered state voters while starting the “vouching” process in the Aug. 11 primary. The process provides a way for voters who lack proof of their current address to register and vote in their new precinct on the same day after a voter already registered in that precinct “vouches” for them.

Political hit job. Instead of attacking the messengers, maybe reform your voting laws. But Minnesota and other leftists won't. It doesn't fit the narrative.

(10-28-2026 10:03 PM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  Political hit job. Instead of attacking the messengers, maybe reform your voting laws. But Minnesota and other leftists won't. It doesn't fit the narrative.

Maybe prove there is voter fraud and maybe not break the law in polling places. You can’t do undercover journalism there.

Nope. The leftists who run Minnesota are just buttmad their stupid voter verification processes got exposed. Neither O'Keefe nor Higby voted or even signed an affidavit while they were undercover as Muslims. "Can I vouch for him?" "Oh, yeah. You certainly can."

Pathetic, and of course, you, Mr. X, are defending it. Typical.

(10-28-2026 10:10 PM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  Nope. The leftists who run Minnesota are just buttmad their stupid voter verification processes got exposed. Neither O'Keefe nor Higby voted or even signed an affidavit while they were undercover as Muslims. "Can I vouch for him?" "Oh, yeah. You certainly can."

Pathetic, and of course, you, Mr. X, are defending it. Typical.

when you know it going in, why engage unless sig line 4!!!

it cannot make one feel better unless one loves spearing a brick wall..

this is where that 'faith' dissolves like sand castles upon the shore..

there's a reason I'm A-theist ... I don't have to remember quotes ... the mirror and time within doctrine is all nuts ever needed...

in logic, it becomes fk 'em or scatter ... how ya gonna play it...

Won't stick, but they know that.

Good grief, if stupid could fly he'd be a jet,

Just to be clear, MN didnt arrest them when they thought they were illegal islamist. On the contrary, they said they could vouch for each other and they could vote.

Instead, they charged them after their fraud was exposed.

Pretty stupid ont he libturds part. It only proves that Trump is right.

Charged for embarrassing the authorities.

They never voted. They exposed the loophole for fraud.

(10-29-2026 08:38 AM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  Good grief, if stupid could fly he'd be a jet,

They can be charge...heck, anyone can be charged for anything but if they didn't vote and only wanted to expose the fraud there they'll have to set them free.

The Op's thread title is false but he probably knows that.

All they exposed is that, yet again, the system worked and the attempted fraud was stopped.

Voter fraud exists in Democrat run states.

And leftists like Tom are perfectly fine with it so long as it means keeping Republicans out of office.

(10-29-2026 10:07 AM)BirdHawkEagle Wrote:  Voter fraud exists in Democrat run states.

And leftists like Tom are perfectly fine with it so long as it means keeping Republicans out of office.

And blaming Republicans when they are in charge of the Federal Government for all of their problems.

(10-29-2026 09:49 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  All they exposed is that, yet again, the system worked and the attempted fraud was stopped.

"the attempted fraud"

You even push a lie when you know it's a lie. That's some weak a$$ crap right there But that's what I expect from you.

(10-29-2026 09:49 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  All they exposed is that, yet again, the system worked and the attempted fraud was stopped.

Actually, thats not correct. They weren't stopped. They chose to walk away before voting, thus no voting fraud occurred. They asked questions and were told the process to vote without ID and how to vouch for up to seven other people who lived with them who didn't have ID's. They then left to go get their other seven friends.

(10-29-2026 10:12 AM)WKUApollo Wrote:  

(10-29-2026 09:49 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  All they exposed is that, yet again, the system worked and the attempted fraud was stopped.

Actually, thats not correct. They weren't stopped. They chose to walk away before voting, thus no voting fraud occurred. They asked questions and were told the process to vote without ID and how to vouch for up to seven other people who lived with them who didn't have ID's. They then left to go get their other seven friends.

So, they did come back and fraudulently vote?

(10-29-2026 10:38 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(10-29-2026 10:12 AM)WKUApollo Wrote:  

(10-29-2026 09:49 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  All they exposed is that, yet again, the system worked and the attempted fraud was stopped.

Actually, thats not correct. They weren't stopped. They chose to walk away before voting, thus no voting fraud occurred. They asked questions and were told the process to vote without ID and how to vouch for up to seven other people who lived with them who didn't have ID's. They then left to go get their other seven friends.

So, they did come back and fraudulently vote?

Nope.