Quote:Twice-failed presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton confidently demanded investigations into everyone connected to President Trump, including his supporters.

Clinton made the remarks during an appearance on Kara Swisher’s “On with Kara Swisher” podcast on Wednesday.

Wednesday’s episode centered around the midterm elections: The Midterm Prep Episode: Tightest Races, Those Ohio Midterm Ads, and Remembering Pizzagate

Hillary Clinton, still bitter from her crushing 2016 loss to President Trump, trashed Trump and called for investigations into every single person connected to him.

“And [Trump] is soon going to have a Democratic congress trying to reign him in and hold him accountable and investigate him, his administration, his family, his supporters and allies.”

“He has literally held Republicans hostage for a decade, and that only works for so long. One day the hostages look around and say there are more of us than there is of him,” Hillary said.

“We need to take him on, and I think we could see that happen, so buckle up. The election is just the beginning,” she said.

This isn’t the first time Hillary Clinton has gone after Trump supporters.

Shortly before the 2016 election, Hillary Clinton sank her campaign when she stated that half of Trump’s supporters belong to a “basket of deplorables.”

In 2024, Hillary Clinton said that everyone who attended President Trump’s Madison Square Garden rally was a Nazi.

Hillary Clinton also previously suggested jailing Trump supporters for posting “misinformation.”

Link

She "demands" it? Under what authority?

(10-30-2026 12:16 PM)Eldonabe Wrote:  She "demands" it? Under what authority?

I’d suggest reading it carefully.

The use of the term form “demand” was authored by the folks at the authorative bible of gatewaypundit.com. /sarcasm.

A good case of some shitshop blogger using incendiary words and evoking the reaction in those who don’t read closely and repeat the term and charge as truth.

Yeah, sure, let’s have investigations.

(10-30-2026 12:26 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(10-30-2026 12:16 PM)Eldonabe Wrote:  She "demands" it? Under what authority?

I’d suggest reading it carefully.

The use of the term form “demand” was authored by the folks at the authorative bible of gatewaypundit.com. /sarcasm.

A good case of some shitshop blogger using incendiary words and evoking the reaction in those who don’t read closely and repeat the term and charge as truth.

just like ewe do, eh?!

She's still not over losing to Trump.

(10-30-2026 12:34 PM)VA49er Wrote:  She's still not over losing to Trump.

It will be her final thoughts on her death bed right before she heads to her fiery eternity.

(10-30-2026 12:34 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(10-30-2026 12:26 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(10-30-2026 12:16 PM)Eldonabe Wrote:  She "demands" it? Under what authority?

I’d suggest reading it carefully.

The use of the term form “demand” was authored by the folks at the authorative bible of gatewaypundit.com. /sarcasm.

A good case of some shitshop blogger using incendiary words and evoking the reaction in those who don’t read closely and repeat the term and charge as truth.

just like ewe do, eh?!

I’m glad you think stating an issue is a demand. And no, I typically don’t grossly inflate the former into the latter. I’ll reserve that move for people overstating crap they don’t bother reading, and for the simpletons that love to hear that crap, love to repeat rhetorical crap, and whine incessantly at people who question it with detail. Sounds a lot like some I know from this board, amigo.

(10-30-2026 12:26 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(10-30-2026 12:16 PM)Eldonabe Wrote:  She "demands" it? Under what authority?

I’d suggest reading it carefully.

The use of the term form “demand” was authored by the folks at the authorative bible of gatewaypundit.com. /sarcasm.

A good case of some shitshop blogger using incendiary words and evoking the reaction in those who don’t read closely and repeat the term and charge as truth.

Um, I am reading it as presented.

What word would you prefer? Ask... wants... desires... pretty pleases


She is clearly looking for it and seems to be pushing for it.

(10-30-2026 12:55 PM)Eldonabe Wrote:  

(10-30-2026 12:26 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(10-30-2026 12:16 PM)Eldonabe Wrote:  She "demands" it? Under what authority?

I’d suggest reading it carefully.

The use of the term form “demand” was authored by the folks at the authorative bible of gatewaypundit.com. /sarcasm.

A good case of some shitshop blogger using incendiary words and evoking the reaction in those who don’t read closely and repeat the term and charge as truth.

Um, I am reading it as presented.

What word would you prefer? Ask... wants... desires... pretty pleases


She is clearly looking for it and seems to be pushing for it.

She made a statement, she called for actions…. Plenty of ways.

Plenty of ways for an intermediary teller of that statement to gin it up to spark a visceral reaction to it. And got you in such a lather that your response was not to the substance —- but being peeved at what AUTHORITY does she have to do that.

I’d say gatewaypundit can call that a clean score for them.

Yeah, she made a point about what voters should expect and wish for, in her opinion. Much like eleventy thousand other politicians and political figures. Not going to say I agree with that avenue. But, to her credit —- there was no DEMAND from her.

Not trying to pick on you or the right in particular, as the left leaning blog th8ngys do just the same. And a lot of lefties do exactly what you just did.


On the backside, have great weekend.

(10-30-2026 12:34 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(10-30-2026 12:26 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(10-30-2026 12:16 PM)Eldonabe Wrote:  She "demands" it? Under what authority?

I’d suggest reading it carefully.

The use of the term form “demand” was authored by the folks at the authorative bible of gatewaypundit.com. /sarcasm.

A good case of some shitshop blogger using incendiary words and evoking the reaction in those who don’t read closely and repeat the term and charge as truth.

just like ewe do, eh?!

Meh, leave him alone; he's been neutered enough. In fact, he is to be congratulated for formulating a post that isn't a whole page long.

Eh, HRC is politically irrelevant. Trump made sure of that.

She is an insufferable c-unt

And Trump is the Fascist?

Oh yeah? Who? She's just another skanky old broad trying to regain her relevance. If they put her forward as a candidate, every democrat in the country would vote for her skanky old self.

(11-02-2026 11:48 AM)VA49er Wrote:  Eh, HRC is politically irrelevant. Trump made sure of that.

Whatever she says, opines, is as important as Oblunder's. It doesn't matter anymore, they have no standing, only in Demonicrat minds. The sane ones just ignore them.

(11-02-2026 11:12 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(10-30-2026 12:34 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(10-30-2026 12:26 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(10-30-2026 12:16 PM)Eldonabe Wrote:  She "demands" it? Under what authority?

I’d suggest reading it carefully.

The use of the term form “demand” was authored by the folks at the authorative bible of gatewaypundit.com. /sarcasm.

A good case of some shitshop blogger using incendiary words and evoking the reaction in those who don’t read closely and repeat the term and charge as truth.

just like ewe do, eh?!

Meh, leave him alone; he's been neutered enough. In fact, he is to be congratulated for formulating a post that isn't a whole page long.

Poor guy, can’t do anything more than a stupidly empty insult. Top of informed discussion for you? Maybe you’ll learn something other than that one trick ****….

And yet she is still more relevant than O'fer