(04-06-2026 04:16 PM)Gitanole Wrote:  Desperate. You can smell the flop sweat.

Trump is great.

Because nothing says ‘religious tolerance’ like an elected official sworn to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States going out of his way to blaspheme someone’s deity.




[/quote]

(04-07-2026 09:35 AM)Gitanole Wrote:  Because nothing says ‘religious tolerance’ like an elected official sworn to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States going out of his way to blaspheme someone’s deity.

[/quote]


Go find a pillow to cry in....

(04-07-2026 09:35 AM)Gitanole Wrote:  Because nothing says ‘religious tolerance’ like an elected official sworn to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States going out of his way to blaspheme someone’s deity.

[/quote]

Oh my, oh my, the blasphemy of it all. Man, you people, bless your hearts, are really into BullSchiff. The Regime does it all the time plus their minions with their "kill the infidel". Who in your mind are they talking about?

(04-06-2026 10:36 PM)TripleA Wrote:  I saw that post and thought two things.

1. Badass post. Exactly what I would have wanted to say in those circumstances.

2. I knew halfway through it the lefties would melt down. It's their kind of freakout, especially when actual R policy issues to criticize don't exist.

Maybe I'm mis-looking, but I see only one (seemingly) "full lefty" (gitanhole) posting within this thread, TA. Your use of the plural "lefties" is confusing. But, again, I might have overlooked a few others.

(04-06-2026 05:33 PM)bill dazzle Wrote:  

(04-06-2026 04:24 PM)BlueDragon Wrote:  

(04-06-2026 02:20 PM)bill dazzle Wrote:  I have to wonder about the responses from some of the righties on the board had Kamala Harris been elected president, attacked Iran and social-media-ed such a post ... (insert from some folks: "Harris would not have had the balls to attack Iran, so it's a moot point.")

Sorry Bil , but your IQ just dropped drastically even hinted Harris would have had any initiative to take on something of this nature.

This Conflation is really hysterically funny when you actually think about it

Cmon man your better than this

My general point, BDragon, is that there is a good bit of inconsistency from both the political left and right. When Joe Biden "subtly cupped" Eva Longoria's breast (as he let loose of his hugging her at the film event honoring her) ... that was disgusting. Yet my lefty friends would not criticize Biden for doing that. Hypothetically, had Don Trump done that to Eva Longoria, my same leftist friends would have howled and called the president every name in the book.

in other news water is wet

(04-07-2026 09:42 AM)BlueDragon Wrote:  

(04-06-2026 05:33 PM)bill dazzle Wrote:  

(04-06-2026 04:24 PM)BlueDragon Wrote:  

(04-06-2026 02:20 PM)bill dazzle Wrote:  I have to wonder about the responses from some of the righties on the board had Kamala Harris been elected president, attacked Iran and social-media-ed such a post ... (insert from some folks: "Harris would not have had the balls to attack Iran, so it's a moot point.")

Sorry Bil , but your IQ just dropped drastically even hinted Harris would have had any initiative to take on something of this nature.

This Conflation is really hysterically funny when you actually think about it

Cmon man your better than this

My general point, BDragon, is that there is a good bit of inconsistency from both the political left and right. When Joe Biden "subtly cupped" Eva Longoria's breast (as he let loose of his hugging her at the film event honoring her) ... that was disgusting. Yet my lefty friends would not criticize Biden for doing that. Hypothetically, had Don Trump done that to Eva Longoria, my same leftist friends would have howled and called the president every name in the book.

in other news water is wet

I should have posted this:

There is a good bit of inconsistency from both the political left and right. Sadly, some of the people who speak and act with such inconsistency are either too clueless or too hateful of the "enemy" to recognize their inconsistency.

So wait a year ago when all the Dems did the F you to DJT was applauded and brave, but this is unacceptable.

I can't keep up with the left's hypocrisy.

(04-07-2026 09:45 AM)gdunn Wrote:  So wait a year ago when all the Dems did the F you to DJT was applauded and brave, but this is unacceptable.

I can't keep up with the left's hypocrisy.

Its pathetic.

Mean words.....

No class.

(04-07-2026 11:13 AM)Gitanole Wrote:  No class.

So you put DJT in the same class as Biden, Harris, the squad, Jeffries, Schumer and pretty much the whole Democratic leadership plus every TDS posting progressive like yourself. I can agree with that.

(04-07-2026 11:13 AM)Gitanole Wrote:  No class.

So how do you explain these? (There are just three examples here. I could always go back for more.)











Spare me your fake outrage.

(04-07-2026 11:34 AM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  

(04-07-2026 11:13 AM)Gitanole Wrote:  No class.

So how do you explain these? (There are just three examples here. I could always go back for more.)











Spare me your fake outrage.

I hear you Coog, like they have some moral high ground to stand on.

Same group that have posts and videos saying they can't wait for the man to be dead so they can dance in the street..

(04-07-2026 09:42 AM)bill dazzle Wrote:  

(04-06-2026 10:36 PM)TripleA Wrote:  I saw that post and thought two things.

1. Badass post. Exactly what I would have wanted to say in those circumstances.

2. I knew halfway through it the lefties would melt down. It's their kind of freakout, especially when actual R policy issues to criticize don't exist.

Maybe I'm mis-looking, but I see only one (seemingly) "full lefty" (gitanhole) posting within this thread, TA. Your use of the plural "lefties" is confusing. But, again, I might have overlooked a few others.

You're mis-looking, b/c you don't look like I do. I rarely look at user names, unless I need to know specifically. I just count the pro and anti comments. After the fact, I checked. There were 6 lefty comments. The fact that they all came from Git is irrelevant to me, lol.

(04-07-2026 01:25 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(04-07-2026 09:42 AM)bill dazzle Wrote:  

(04-06-2026 10:36 PM)TripleA Wrote:  I saw that post and thought two things.

1. Badass post. Exactly what I would have wanted to say in those circumstances.

2. I knew halfway through it the lefties would melt down. It's their kind of freakout, especially when actual R policy issues to criticize don't exist.

Maybe I'm mis-looking, but I see only one (seemingly) "full lefty" (gitanhole) posting within this thread, TA. Your use of the plural "lefties" is confusing. But, again, I might have overlooked a few others.

You're mis-looking, b/c you don't look like I do. I rarely look at user names, unless I need to know specifically. I just count the pro and anti comments. After the fact, I checked. There were 6 lefty comments. The fact that they all came from Git is irrelevant to me, lol.

Got it. Makes sense now.

(04-07-2026 01:57 PM)bill dazzle Wrote:  

(04-07-2026 01:25 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(04-07-2026 09:42 AM)bill dazzle Wrote:  

(04-06-2026 10:36 PM)TripleA Wrote:  I saw that post and thought two things.

1. Badass post. Exactly what I would have wanted to say in those circumstances.

2. I knew halfway through it the lefties would melt down. It's their kind of freakout, especially when actual R policy issues to criticize don't exist.

Maybe I'm mis-looking, but I see only one (seemingly) "full lefty" (gitanhole) posting within this thread, TA. Your use of the plural "lefties" is confusing. But, again, I might have overlooked a few others.

You're mis-looking, b/c you don't look like I do. I rarely look at user names, unless I need to know specifically. I just count the pro and anti comments. After the fact, I checked. There were 6 lefty comments. The fact that they all came from Git is irrelevant to me, lol.

Got it. Makes sense now.

If one melts down 6 times, or 6 melt down once each, it's the same. Just different flavors. :)

look at bill pretending again

I guess the president could have said 'dont" or here's the red line in the sand....


Looks like this worked a lot better than "dont" or drawing a redline in the sand. I believe Iran understood President Trump clearly. Iran didnt even take the chance of letting it get close to the 9pm est dead line because a real man backs up his threats. Weak asssshole ball lickers dont.




Now if one of you crazy sob's would grow a set of men balls you would understand these people react to power. Not "dont" or drawing a redline in the sand. Its not 9pm, hell the Strait was open before 6pm

Sorry SOB'S GROW A SET OF BALLS. Is that too vulgar for you?