Hello There, Guest! Registered users see far less ads! Register today and join our virtual tailgate. (Login — Register)

Post Reply 
Israel Is Attacking Iran...Now US
Author Message
200yrs2late Offline
Resident Parrothead
*

Posts: 15,751
Joined: Jan 2010
Reputation: 846
I Root For: East Carolina
Location: SE of disorder
Post: #661
RE: Israel Is Attacking Iran...Now US
(03-05-2026 12:23 PM)hburg Wrote:  Houthis as expected are about to announce their entry into the war.

Good, we can finally get rid of them too.
03-05-2026 12:39 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
bullet Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 83,760
Joined: Apr 2012
Reputation: 5065
I Root For: Texas, UK, UGA
Location:
Post: #662
RE: Israel Is Attacking Iran...Now US
(03-05-2026 12:23 PM)hburg Wrote:  Houthis as expected are about to announce their entry into the war.

I'm all for killing pirates. Kill as many as you can.

Go full TJ on them.
03-05-2026 12:39 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
bullet Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 83,760
Joined: Apr 2012
Reputation: 5065
I Root For: Texas, UK, UGA
Location:
Post: #663
RE: Israel Is Attacking Iran...Now US
Assist the Saudis in putting an end to the Houthi threat once and for all. Our Air Force, Saudi troops.
03-05-2026 12:40 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
CrimsonPhantom Offline
CUSA Curator
*

Posts: 62,773
Joined: Mar 2013
Reputation: 3193
I Root For: NM State
Location:
Post: #664
RE: Israel Is Attacking Iran...Now US
03-05-2026 01:02 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
DaSaintFan Offline
Dum' Sutherner in Midwest!
*

Posts: 17,170
Joined: Mar 2010
Reputation: 595
I Root For: Southern Miss
Location: Stuck in St. Louis
Post: #665
RE: Israel Is Attacking Iran...Now US
(03-03-2026 11:53 PM)Native Georgian Wrote:  
(03-03-2026 11:36 PM)hburg Wrote:  The Kurds announced they will be launching a ground operation against the Iranian Regime in the coming days.
Strange that they would “announce” that in media.

Iraqi and Irani Kurds are both denying they made this statement... so not sure what to believe (Afghanistan Kurds maybe?)
03-05-2026 02:08 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
CrimsonPhantom Offline
CUSA Curator
*

Posts: 62,773
Joined: Mar 2013
Reputation: 3193
I Root For: NM State
Location:
Post: #666
RE: Israel Is Attacking Iran...Now US
03-05-2026 03:14 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
TripleA Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 83,865
Joined: Jun 2008
Reputation: 5715
I Root For: Nice weather
Location: Following the sun

Memphis Hall of Fame
Post: #667
RE: Israel Is Attacking Iran...Now US
I love one-sided wars. When we're winning. That's the reason for being, right?

No more frickin' Vietnams.
03-05-2026 03:53 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
CrimsonPhantom Offline
CUSA Curator
*

Posts: 62,773
Joined: Mar 2013
Reputation: 3193
I Root For: NM State
Location:
Post: #668
RE: Israel Is Attacking Iran...Now US
03-05-2026 04:02 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
GeminiCoog Offline
Saved by grace through faith.
*

Posts: 21,989
Joined: Sep 2010
Reputation: 2170
I Root For: Houston, Notre Dame
Location: Dayton, Texas, USA
Post: #669
RE: Israel Is Attacking Iran...Now US
(03-05-2026 12:40 PM)bullet Wrote:  Assist the Saudis in putting an end to the Houthi threat once and for all. Our Air Force, Saudi troops.

Yes! Of course, the Houthis are (well, were) backed by the IRGC, too. They may have already taken a financial hit.
03-05-2026 07:10 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Native Georgian Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 31,594
Joined: May 2008
Reputation: 1425
I Root For: TULANE+GA.STATE
Location: Decatur GA
Post: #670
RE: Israel Is Attacking Iran...Now US
(03-05-2026 03:53 PM)TripleA Wrote:  No more frickin' Vietnams.
Even after all these years, that subject is still so painful to think about. America truly did wage the war in the most incompetent manner, and then made a collective political decision to lose the war outright.

It simply did not have to end that way.
(This post was last modified: 03-05-2026 07:37 PM by Native Georgian.)
03-05-2026 07:29 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
JRsec Offline
Super Moderator
*

Posts: 44,954
Joined: Mar 2012
Reputation: 13486
I Root For: SEC
Location:
Post: #671
RE: Israel Is Attacking Iran...Now US
(03-05-2026 07:29 PM)Native Georgian Wrote:  
(03-05-2026 03:53 PM)TripleA Wrote:  No more frickin' Vietnams.
Even after all these years, that subject is still so painful to think about. America truly did make a collective political decision to wage the war in the most incompetent manner, and then a separate decision to simply lose the war. It did not have to be that way.
For someone born in 1970, who is my oldest daughter's age, and did not cognitively live through the era, what I would say was it was much more complex than you make it out to be. While China supplied the bulk of material for the North, Russia was never out of the picture, nor was another potential threat via Russia's closeness with Cuba.

Our Nato partners were not as supportive as many may think and Royal Dutch Shell Oil provided our adversaries with fuel during the war. And the were appropriately named shell because that's what kind of company they were so that the company founded in Houston in 1949 could conduct business with both sides during the war.

Between Maoist backed organizations like the Black Panthers and the assassinations of M.L. King and Malcom X for refusing to play up racial division, and the actions of the Weather Underground blowing up government facilities and Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dorn never being prosecuted for them and benefitting from clemency given to draft dodgers who fled to Canada, and the campus protests which were for both sides, and a war policy that everyone in the military knew was not going to lead to a successful conclusion, let alone a productive prosecution of the war by taking the war North of the DMZ, and the fear in the 60's of nuclear war, which the communists played up as a reason for our European allies to fear the continued pursuit of the war, right down to the Paris Peace talks where Kissinger left behind any P.O.W's whose whereabouts were unknown (jungle camps) and their capture unconfirmed in order to get out and the final but subsequent 55 days were horrendous for those allied with U.S. forces and left behind. And the role of the United Nations for which we carried the bulk of funding was a pain in the ass constantly due to the nature and make up of its security council.

To call it all a total Charlie Foxtrot is fair. But to lay it out so simply is to misunderstand the climate, the profit motive of the American Military Industrial Complex which was best profited by expended ordinance and destroyed equipment in need of replacement, the sale of Oil/Petrol at a time when gas wars were ongoing in the U.S. with gasoline in the late 60's well under 30 cents a gallon in some places, and all of it a continuation of the profit engine created and stoked during WWII, sustained during Korea, and fearing recession in the mid 60's and you've only begun to scratch the surface of what it all meant.

Marry the desires of our adversaries to the profit motives of our corporations, and the national debt growing disproportionately for the war effort with every dollar borrowed assisting the growth of the Federal Reserves' power, complete to the point of the draining of the U.S. Treasury of Silver Coins to be melted and sold at a profit overseas leading to the Federal Coinage act of 1965 which took silver out of dimes and quarters and reduced it to 40% of the composition of the half dollar, and then add the hatred for the draft to fight a war which everyone knew was unwinnable with a repeat of a DMZ as we learned from Korea, and polished off with Hanoi Jane handing a communist POW commandant a list of names of POW known to be retained in jungle camps preventing the negotiations of Kissinger from bringing them home and ruminate on that for a decade and a half and having soldiers return to the vile response of the ignorant young who were their age roughly and then you have then you have only begun to comment on that War, its complexities, its pain, and the complete waste of lives, money, and bleeding of power we did not begin to reassemble until the Soviets got their ass handed to them in Afghanistan.

Our military is still too damned political at the top. But it seems to be improving if only a bit.

Grasp all of that and only then can you begin to comprehend that war. The crap they teach you in school about it has been redacted by left leaning professors, to suit their narratives, and not as reality.

And that sir is the reality!

Well, it is the reality except for one annoyingly ironic but sad detail. Ho Chi Minh approached us for help before turning to the Chinese. We turned him down out of loyalty to our WWII French allies who were the former power over their colonial holdings in SE Asia.
(This post was last modified: 03-05-2026 08:18 PM by JRsec.)
03-05-2026 08:05 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Native Georgian Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 31,594
Joined: May 2008
Reputation: 1425
I Root For: TULANE+GA.STATE
Location: Decatur GA
Post: #672
RE: Israel Is Attacking Iran...Now US
(03-05-2026 08:05 PM)JRsec Wrote:  
(03-05-2026 07:29 PM)Native Georgian Wrote:  
(03-05-2026 03:53 PM)TripleA Wrote:  No more frickin' Vietnams.
Even after all these years, that subject is still so painful to think about. America truly did wage the war in the most incompetent manner, and then made a collective political decision to lose the war outright.

It simply did not have to end that way.
For someone born in 1970, who is my oldest daughter's age, and did not cognitively live through the era, what I would say was it was much more complex than you make it out to be.
Point taken. I admit I was just offering a hot take, nothing more.

Quote:a war which everyone knew was unwinnable with a repeat of a DMZ as we learned from Korea
It was unwinnable based on the strategies/tactics the U.S. actually used from 1961-1975. But other strategies and other tactics — non-nuclear tactics, I hasten to add — were readily available and would have resulted in American victory if used at any time prior to (roughly) Nixon’s resignation. By the time Ford stepped in, I admit it was probably just too late.

I’ll leave it there. If there is a thread on this subject maybe I’ll jump in LOL
(This post was last modified: 03-05-2026 08:41 PM by Native Georgian.)
03-05-2026 08:29 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
JRsec Offline
Super Moderator
*

Posts: 44,954
Joined: Mar 2012
Reputation: 13486
I Root For: SEC
Location:
Post: #673
RE: Israel Is Attacking Iran...Now US
(03-05-2026 08:29 PM)Native Georgian Wrote:  
(03-05-2026 08:05 PM)TripleA Wrote:  
(03-05-2026 07:29 PM)Native Georgian Wrote:  
(03-05-2026 03:53 PM)TripleA Wrote:  No more frickin' Vietnams.
Even after all these years, that subject is still so painful to think about. America truly did wage the war in the most incompetent manner, and then made a collective political decision to lose the war outright.

It simply did not have to end that way.
For someone born in 1970, who is my oldest daughter's age, and did not cognitively live through the era, what I would say was it was much more complex than you make it out to be.
Point taken. I admit I was just offering a hot take, nothing more.

Quote:a war which everyone knew was unwinnable with a repeat of a DMZ as we learned from Korea
It was unwinnable based on the strategies/tactics the U.S. actually used from 1961-1975. But other strategies and other tactics — non-nuclear tactics, I hasten to add — were readily available and would have resulted in American victory if used at any time prior to (roughly) Nixon’s resignation. By the time Ford stepped in, I admit it was probably just too late.

I’ll leave it there. If there is a thread on this subject maybe I’ll jump in LOL

The whole threat was a broader war if we prosecuted the war reasonably and successfully. The nuclear threat was not from us. The nuclear threat was still the specter of Russian aggression and was palpable following the Cuban Missile Crisis.

To say we could have won it is not in dispute, and our military knew that as well. To say we could win it employing the same restrictions to a similar scenario we faced in Korea (another war which was also winnable by conventional means) was far from encouraging. It is why the CIA conducted operations "allegedly" in Laos and Cambodia, and why all of our command officers wanted to obliterate the Ho Chi Minh Trail and bomb Haiphong Harbor. You can't win if you can't advance and destroy the means of resupply and that resupply was coming down the trail and through Laos and Cambodia.

And again, Nixon's resignation was one event in a panorama of world issues, not the least of which was his previous attempt to "play the China card". It's hard to maintain a threat against the ally of an enemy you are courting for a relationship.

History is great at recording events and lousy at adequately describing the sitz im leben of those events and the public attitudes surrounding it. The question sir, is not did we have the means and ability, but rather why we didn't use them?
03-05-2026 08:47 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
bullet Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 83,760
Joined: Apr 2012
Reputation: 5065
I Root For: Texas, UK, UGA
Location:
Post: #674
RE: Israel Is Attacking Iran...Now US
(03-05-2026 08:47 PM)JRsec Wrote:  
(03-05-2026 08:29 PM)Native Georgian Wrote:  
(03-05-2026 08:05 PM)TripleA Wrote:  
(03-05-2026 07:29 PM)Native Georgian Wrote:  
(03-05-2026 03:53 PM)TripleA Wrote:  No more frickin' Vietnams.
Even after all these years, that subject is still so painful to think about. America truly did wage the war in the most incompetent manner, and then made a collective political decision to lose the war outright.

It simply did not have to end that way.
For someone born in 1970, who is my oldest daughter's age, and did not cognitively live through the era, what I would say was it was much more complex than you make it out to be.
Point taken. I admit I was just offering a hot take, nothing more.

Quote:a war which everyone knew was unwinnable with a repeat of a DMZ as we learned from Korea
It was unwinnable based on the strategies/tactics the U.S. actually used from 1961-1975. But other strategies and other tactics — non-nuclear tactics, I hasten to add — were readily available and would have resulted in American victory if used at any time prior to (roughly) Nixon’s resignation. By the time Ford stepped in, I admit it was probably just too late.

I’ll leave it there. If there is a thread on this subject maybe I’ll jump in LOL

The whole threat was a broader war if we prosecuted the war reasonably and successfully. The nuclear threat was not from us. The nuclear threat was still the specter of Russian aggression and was palpable following the Cuban Missile Crisis.

To say we could have won it is not in dispute, and our military knew that as well. To say we could win it employing the same restrictions to a similar scenario we faced in Korea (another war which was also winnable by conventional means) was far from encouraging. It is why the CIA conducted operations "allegedly" in Laos and Cambodia, and why all of our command officers wanted to obliterate the Ho Chi Minh Trail and bomb Haiphong Harbor. You can't win if you can't advance and destroy the means of resupply and that resupply was coming down the trail and through Laos and Cambodia.

And again, Nixon's resignation was one event in a panorama of world issues, not the least of which was his previous attempt to "play the China card". It's hard to maintain a threat against the ally of an enemy you are courting for a relationship.

History is great at recording events and lousy at adequately describing the sitz im leben of those events and the public attitudes surrounding it. The question sir, is not did we have the means and ability, but rather why we didn't use them?

I don't think it was "winnable." If we invaded the North, the Chinese would come in again like in Korea. It would have been another stalemate. The Chinese would have thrown in endless men and we didn't have the tech advantage we have now. The North Vietnamese had better artillery than we did. We had to rely on the Air Force.

And the real problem was half the South was for the other side, making it even more difficult.

Of course what LBJ did was criminal. He tied the military's hands behind their back, knew his strategy couldn't win (there are records of that), yet still kept sending our soldiers there to die. Nixon at least started blowing the hell out of them and arranged a peace. But when Congress tied Nixon's hands, the South Vietnamese fell apart.

And the end result ended up not being that bad for us. Cambodia and Laos were the only dominos.
03-05-2026 09:01 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Attackcoog Offline
Moderator
*

Posts: 49,223
Joined: Oct 2011
Reputation: 3527
I Root For: Houston
Location:
Post: #675
RE: Israel Is Attacking Iran...Now US
(03-05-2026 09:01 PM)bullet Wrote:  
(03-05-2026 08:47 PM)JRsec Wrote:  
(03-05-2026 08:29 PM)Native Georgian Wrote:  
(03-05-2026 08:05 PM)TripleA Wrote:  
(03-05-2026 07:29 PM)Native Georgian Wrote:  Even after all these years, that subject is still so painful to think about. America truly did wage the war in the most incompetent manner, and then made a collective political decision to lose the war outright.

It simply did not have to end that way.
For someone born in 1970, who is my oldest daughter's age, and did not cognitively live through the era, what I would say was it was much more complex than you make it out to be.
Point taken. I admit I was just offering a hot take, nothing more.

Quote:a war which everyone knew was unwinnable with a repeat of a DMZ as we learned from Korea
It was unwinnable based on the strategies/tactics the U.S. actually used from 1961-1975. But other strategies and other tactics — non-nuclear tactics, I hasten to add — were readily available and would have resulted in American victory if used at any time prior to (roughly) Nixon’s resignation. By the time Ford stepped in, I admit it was probably just too late.

I’ll leave it there. If there is a thread on this subject maybe I’ll jump in LOL

The whole threat was a broader war if we prosecuted the war reasonably and successfully. The nuclear threat was not from us. The nuclear threat was still the specter of Russian aggression and was palpable following the Cuban Missile Crisis.

To say we could have won it is not in dispute, and our military knew that as well. To say we could win it employing the same restrictions to a similar scenario we faced in Korea (another war which was also winnable by conventional means) was far from encouraging. It is why the CIA conducted operations "allegedly" in Laos and Cambodia, and why all of our command officers wanted to obliterate the Ho Chi Minh Trail and bomb Haiphong Harbor. You can't win if you can't advance and destroy the means of resupply and that resupply was coming down the trail and through Laos and Cambodia.

And again, Nixon's resignation was one event in a panorama of world issues, not the least of which was his previous attempt to "play the China card". It's hard to maintain a threat against the ally of an enemy you are courting for a relationship.

History is great at recording events and lousy at adequately describing the sitz im leben of those events and the public attitudes surrounding it. The question sir, is not did we have the means and ability, but rather why we didn't use them?

I don't think it was "winnable." If we invaded the North, the Chinese would come in again like in Korea. It would have been another stalemate. The Chinese would have thrown in endless men and we didn't have the tech advantage we have now. The North Vietnamese had better artillery than we did. We had to rely on the Air Force.

And the real problem was half the South was for the other side, making it even more difficult.

Of course what LBJ did was criminal. He tied the military's hands behind their back, knew his strategy couldn't win (there are records of that), yet still kept sending our soldiers there to die.
Nixon at least started blowing the hell out of them and arranged a peace. But when Congress tied Nixon's hands, the South Vietnamese fell apart.

And the end result ended up not being that bad for us. Cambodia and Laos were the only dominos.

Thats what I think. The S Vietnamese president was a crook and the people disliked him. Add to that the poor political decisions that meant we were never fighting to win---it was just a terrible terrible situation to send our soldiers into. That said, I dont think thats anything like the current situation.
(This post was last modified: 03-05-2026 09:48 PM by Attackcoog.)
03-05-2026 09:17 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
WKUYG Away
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 16,227
Joined: Oct 2012
Reputation: 2326
I Root For: WKU
Location:
Post: #676
RE: Israel Is Attacking Iran...Now US
One thing I think its safe to say about President Trump, if he's going to OK our arm forces fight a battle. He's going to let the leadership do most of the shot calling. Unless there are really major screwups....

he's going to basically do what the Generals in charge want. Or what they need to win.
03-05-2026 09:30 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
TripleA Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 83,865
Joined: Jun 2008
Reputation: 5715
I Root For: Nice weather
Location: Following the sun

Memphis Hall of Fame
Post: #677
RE: Israel Is Attacking Iran...Now US
(03-05-2026 09:30 PM)WKUYG Wrote:  One thing I think its safe to say about President Trump, if he's going to OK our arm forces fight a battle. He's going to let the leadership do most of the shot calling. Unless there are really major screwups....

he's going to basically do what the Generals in charge want. Or what they need to win.

You mean he's not going to be planning sortie flight paths, like Johnson and McNamara did in Nam? Effing morons.
03-05-2026 09:43 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
JRsec Offline
Super Moderator
*

Posts: 44,954
Joined: Mar 2012
Reputation: 13486
I Root For: SEC
Location:
Post: #678
RE: Israel Is Attacking Iran...Now US
(03-05-2026 09:43 PM)TripleA Wrote:  
(03-05-2026 09:30 PM)WKUYG Wrote:  One thing I think its safe to say about President Trump, if he's going to OK our arm forces fight a battle. He's going to let the leadership do most of the shot calling. Unless there are really major screwups....

he's going to basically do what the Generals in charge want. Or what they need to win.

You mean he's not going to be planning sortie flight paths, like Johnson and McNamara did in Nam? Effing morons.
Trump would have promoted Robin Olds and let him win it. If you don't know about him, it's a great read. It's another one of those things your history professor will never mention. He was a great American fighter pilot!
(This post was last modified: 03-05-2026 09:46 PM by JRsec.)
03-05-2026 09:45 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
TripleA Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 83,865
Joined: Jun 2008
Reputation: 5715
I Root For: Nice weather
Location: Following the sun

Memphis Hall of Fame
Post: #679
RE: Israel Is Attacking Iran...Now US
(03-05-2026 09:45 PM)JRsec Wrote:  
(03-05-2026 09:43 PM)TripleA Wrote:  
(03-05-2026 09:30 PM)WKUYG Wrote:  One thing I think its safe to say about President Trump, if he's going to OK our arm forces fight a battle. He's going to let the leadership do most of the shot calling. Unless there are really major screwups....

he's going to basically do what the Generals in charge want. Or what they need to win.

You mean he's not going to be planning sortie flight paths, like Johnson and McNamara did in Nam? Effing morons.
Trump would have promoted Robin Olds and let him win it. If you don't know about him, it's a great read. It's another one of those things your history professor will never mention. He was a great American fighter pilot!

Didn't know him. Looked him up. Triple ace across 2 wars. Cool.

Dude flew Phantoms. That's my plane. I'll have to read up on him now. Thanks.
03-05-2026 09:55 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
58-56 Offline
Blazer Revolutionary
*

Posts: 13,865
Joined: Mar 2006
Reputation: 952
I Root For: Fire Ray Watts
Location: CathedraloftheDragon

BlazerTalk Award
Post: #680
RE: Israel Is Attacking Iran...Now US
(03-05-2026 09:45 PM)JRsec Wrote:  Trump would have promoted Robin Olds and let him win it. If you don't know about him, it's a great read. It's another one of those things your history professor will never mention. He was a great American fighter pilot!

Read about him? My father flew with him.
03-05-2026 11:04 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2026 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group.