(02-03-2026 11:09 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(02-02-2026 09:43 PM)BigTigerMike Wrote:  Contrary to the blatantly false and slanderous accusations being made against me by Members of Congress and their friends in the propaganda media, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence has and will continue to take action under my statutory authorities to secure our nation and ensure the integrity of our elections.

My response to Congress:

Miles has said this multiple times without referencing the "order". And if it was an "order", it could have already been revoked.

Until Miles gets more detailed about what exactly he is talking about, Miles is full of sh*t. Because Miles is trying to get gullible taint swallowers to believe there's an issue because Miles is the authority on this. He is not.

(02-03-2026 11:19 AM)ballantyneapp Wrote:  

(02-03-2026 10:50 AM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  I'll ask this one more time for the leftists on the board: If your side truly has nothing to hide -- if 2020 truly was the "most secure ever" as you claim, why are you squawking when we insist on investigating one county in a swing state? You say our election laws and rules are fine, but you just want us to take your word for it instead of letting us look into it so we can at least have piece of mind if you turn out to be right as a result of our investigation. I have a better idea. Quit fighting this and let the truth come to light, whatever that may be.

The problem GC is this has been investigated multiple times, Dear Leader didn’t like the findings.

Gabbard is another Russian asset doing the kremlins work.

I have zero trust in any “investigation” carried out by these people, this is to:
1. Satisfy dear leaders hurt butt over losing to Joe Biden
2. Grab more data in order to meddle in elections

As shown from this warrant, it really has never been investigated. That is a simple fact.

Since it can't change the result of the election, why do you oppose transparency? Why do you oppose making sure elections are run properly so all legal votes and only legal votes get counted?

(02-03-2026 11:22 AM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  Keep telling yourself that. Trump ain't a Russian agent. Gabbard, a former Democrat congresswoman who left the party because y'all have become absolutely batshit crazy, isn't either.

Not my fault you can't see the truth, balls.

Putting Gabbard on the no fly list is one of the more egregious things they did.

(02-03-2026 11:19 AM)ballantyneapp Wrote:  

(02-03-2026 10:50 AM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  I'll ask this one more time for the leftists on the board: If your side truly has nothing to hide -- if 2020 truly was the "most secure ever" as you claim, why are you squawking when we insist on investigating one county in a swing state? You say our election laws and rules are fine, but you just want us to take your word for it instead of letting us look into it so we can at least have piece of mind if you turn out to be right as a result of our investigation. I have a better idea. Quit fighting this and let the truth come to light, whatever that may be.

The problem GC is this has been investigated multiple times, Dear Leader didn’t like the findings.

Gabbard is another Russian asset doing the kremlins work.

I have zero trust in any “investigation” carried out by these people, this is to:
1. Satisfy dear leaders hurt butt over losing to Joe Biden
2. Grab more data in order to meddle in elections

You do know they investigated.... themselves

Why do you think they are losing their minds and shitting their panties

Bwhahahaha youre a goof.

Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

(02-03-2026 11:56 AM)bullet Wrote:  

(02-03-2026 11:22 AM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  Keep telling yourself that. Trump ain't a Russian agent. Gabbard, a former Democrat congresswoman who left the party because y'all have become absolutely batshit crazy, isn't either.

Not my fault you can't see the truth, balls.

Putting Gabbard on the no fly list is one of the more egregious things they did.

That Biden administration governed like hormonal high school mean girls.

(02-03-2026 12:29 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  

(02-03-2026 11:56 AM)bullet Wrote:  

(02-03-2026 11:22 AM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  Keep telling yourself that. Trump ain't a Russian agent. Gabbard, a former Democrat congresswoman who left the party because y'all have become absolutely batshit crazy, isn't either.

Not my fault you can't see the truth, balls.

Putting Gabbard on the no fly list is one of the more egregious things they did.

That Biden administration governed like hormonal high school mean girls.

That's the left for ya.

(02-03-2026 11:55 AM)bullet Wrote:  

(02-03-2026 11:19 AM)ballantyneapp Wrote:  

(02-03-2026 10:50 AM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  I'll ask this one more time for the leftists on the board: If your side truly has nothing to hide -- if 2020 truly was the "most secure ever" as you claim, why are you squawking when we insist on investigating one county in a swing state? You say our election laws and rules are fine, but you just want us to take your word for it instead of letting us look into it so we can at least have piece of mind if you turn out to be right as a result of our investigation. I have a better idea. Quit fighting this and let the truth come to light, whatever that may be.

The problem GC is this has been investigated multiple times, Dear Leader didn’t like the findings.

Gabbard is another Russian asset doing the kremlins work.

I have zero trust in any “investigation” carried out by these people, this is to:
1. Satisfy dear leaders hurt butt over losing to Joe Biden
2. Grab more data in order to meddle in elections

As shown from this warrant, it really has never been investigated. That is a simple fact.

Since it can't change the result of the election, why do you oppose transparency? Why do you oppose making sure elections are run properly so all legal votes and only legal votes get counted?

Can you link the warrant please, since you seem to be quoting from it? Thanks.

And again, this has nothing to do with transparency.

(02-03-2026 01:30 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(02-03-2026 11:55 AM)bullet Wrote:  

(02-03-2026 11:19 AM)ballantyneapp Wrote:  

(02-03-2026 10:50 AM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  I'll ask this one more time for the leftists on the board: If your side truly has nothing to hide -- if 2020 truly was the "most secure ever" as you claim, why are you squawking when we insist on investigating one county in a swing state? You say our election laws and rules are fine, but you just want us to take your word for it instead of letting us look into it so we can at least have piece of mind if you turn out to be right as a result of our investigation. I have a better idea. Quit fighting this and let the truth come to light, whatever that may be.

The problem GC is this has been investigated multiple times, Dear Leader didn’t like the findings.

Gabbard is another Russian asset doing the kremlins work.

I have zero trust in any “investigation” carried out by these people, this is to:
1. Satisfy dear leaders hurt butt over losing to Joe Biden
2. Grab more data in order to meddle in elections

As shown from this warrant, it really has never been investigated. That is a simple fact.

Since it can't change the result of the election, why do you oppose transparency? Why do you oppose making sure elections are run properly so all legal votes and only legal votes get counted?

Can you link the warrant please, since you seem to be quoting from it? Thanks.

And again, this has nothing to do with transparency.

The warrant exists because a judge found that a crime probably occurred.

Thats all you need to know.

(02-03-2026 01:33 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(02-03-2026 01:30 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(02-03-2026 11:55 AM)bullet Wrote:  

(02-03-2026 11:19 AM)ballantyneapp Wrote:  

(02-03-2026 10:50 AM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  I'll ask this one more time for the leftists on the board: If your side truly has nothing to hide -- if 2020 truly was the "most secure ever" as you claim, why are you squawking when we insist on investigating one county in a swing state? You say our election laws and rules are fine, but you just want us to take your word for it instead of letting us look into it so we can at least have piece of mind if you turn out to be right as a result of our investigation. I have a better idea. Quit fighting this and let the truth come to light, whatever that may be.

The problem GC is this has been investigated multiple times, Dear Leader didn’t like the findings.

Gabbard is another Russian asset doing the kremlins work.

I have zero trust in any “investigation” carried out by these people, this is to:
1. Satisfy dear leaders hurt butt over losing to Joe Biden
2. Grab more data in order to meddle in elections

As shown from this warrant, it really has never been investigated. That is a simple fact.

Since it can't change the result of the election, why do you oppose transparency? Why do you oppose making sure elections are run properly so all legal votes and only legal votes get counted?

Can you link the warrant please, since you seem to be quoting from it? Thanks.

And again, this has nothing to do with transparency.

The warrant exists because a judge found that a crime probably occurred.

Thats all you need to know.

Except when the target is a republican, AMIRITE? Hypocrite.

Also, I don't think we even know the name of this judge.

But trust the government, right...a Republican is in charge.

(02-03-2026 01:33 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(02-03-2026 01:30 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(02-03-2026 11:55 AM)bullet Wrote:  

(02-03-2026 11:19 AM)ballantyneapp Wrote:  

(02-03-2026 10:50 AM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  I'll ask this one more time for the leftists on the board: If your side truly has nothing to hide -- if 2020 truly was the "most secure ever" as you claim, why are you squawking when we insist on investigating one county in a swing state? You say our election laws and rules are fine, but you just want us to take your word for it instead of letting us look into it so we can at least have piece of mind if you turn out to be right as a result of our investigation. I have a better idea. Quit fighting this and let the truth come to light, whatever that may be.

The problem GC is this has been investigated multiple times, Dear Leader didn’t like the findings.

Gabbard is another Russian asset doing the kremlins work.

I have zero trust in any “investigation” carried out by these people, this is to:
1. Satisfy dear leaders hurt butt over losing to Joe Biden
2. Grab more data in order to meddle in elections

As shown from this warrant, it really has never been investigated. That is a simple fact.

Since it can't change the result of the election, why do you oppose transparency? Why do you oppose making sure elections are run properly so all legal votes and only legal votes get counted?

Can you link the warrant please, since you seem to be quoting from it? Thanks.

And again, this has nothing to do with transparency.

The warrant exists because a judge found that a crime probably occurred.

Thats all you need to know.

They cheated and want to hide it

Its not complicated.

(02-03-2026 01:33 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(02-03-2026 01:30 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(02-03-2026 11:55 AM)bullet Wrote:  

(02-03-2026 11:19 AM)ballantyneapp Wrote:  

(02-03-2026 10:50 AM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  I'll ask this one more time for the leftists on the board: If your side truly has nothing to hide -- if 2020 truly was the "most secure ever" as you claim, why are you squawking when we insist on investigating one county in a swing state? You say our election laws and rules are fine, but you just want us to take your word for it instead of letting us look into it so we can at least have piece of mind if you turn out to be right as a result of our investigation. I have a better idea. Quit fighting this and let the truth come to light, whatever that may be.

The problem GC is this has been investigated multiple times, Dear Leader didn’t like the findings.

Gabbard is another Russian asset doing the kremlins work.

I have zero trust in any “investigation” carried out by these people, this is to:
1. Satisfy dear leaders hurt butt over losing to Joe Biden
2. Grab more data in order to meddle in elections

As shown from this warrant, it really has never been investigated. That is a simple fact.

Since it can't change the result of the election, why do you oppose transparency? Why do you oppose making sure elections are run properly so all legal votes and only legal votes get counted?

Can you link the warrant please, since you seem to be quoting from it? Thanks.

And again, this has nothing to do with transparency.

The warrant exists because a judge found that a crime probably occurred.

Thats all you need to know.

He doesn't care.

SK: He doesn't care.

(02-03-2026 01:41 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(02-03-2026 01:33 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(02-03-2026 01:30 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(02-03-2026 11:55 AM)bullet Wrote:  

(02-03-2026 11:19 AM)ballantyneapp Wrote:  The problem GC is this has been investigated multiple times, Dear Leader didn’t like the findings.

Gabbard is another Russian asset doing the kremlins work.

I have zero trust in any “investigation” carried out by these people, this is to:
1. Satisfy dear leaders hurt butt over losing to Joe Biden
2. Grab more data in order to meddle in elections

As shown from this warrant, it really has never been investigated. That is a simple fact.

Since it can't change the result of the election, why do you oppose transparency? Why do you oppose making sure elections are run properly so all legal votes and only legal votes get counted?

Can you link the warrant please, since you seem to be quoting from it? Thanks.

And again, this has nothing to do with transparency.

The warrant exists because a judge found that a crime probably occurred.

Thats all you need to know.

Except when the target is a republican, AMIRITE? Hypocrite.

Also, I don't think we even know the name of this judge.

But trust the government, right...a Republican is in charge.

no moron. Unless the target is a FORMER PRESIDENT who has additional CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTIONS that your f*ing sh*t for brains administration didnt care about.


Which is why Trump has all of his materials back in his possession, and your side continuously got their asses handed to them as this played out.

(02-03-2026 01:41 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(02-03-2026 01:33 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(02-03-2026 01:30 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(02-03-2026 11:55 AM)bullet Wrote:  

(02-03-2026 11:19 AM)ballantyneapp Wrote:  The problem GC is this has been investigated multiple times, Dear Leader didn’t like the findings.

Gabbard is another Russian asset doing the kremlins work.

I have zero trust in any “investigation” carried out by these people, this is to:
1. Satisfy dear leaders hurt butt over losing to Joe Biden
2. Grab more data in order to meddle in elections

As shown from this warrant, it really has never been investigated. That is a simple fact.

Since it can't change the result of the election, why do you oppose transparency? Why do you oppose making sure elections are run properly so all legal votes and only legal votes get counted?

Can you link the warrant please, since you seem to be quoting from it? Thanks.

And again, this has nothing to do with transparency.

The warrant exists because a judge found that a crime probably occurred.

Thats all you need to know.

Except when the target is a republican, AMIRITE? Hypocrite.

Also, I don't think we even know the name of this judge.

But trust the government, right...a Republican is in charge.

Youve lost your opinion card on this board as well. Keep talking but no one takes you seriously due to the last 10 years of idiotic, moronic, retarded things you and your comrades have believed and defended.

No valid opinion card for you.

Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

(02-03-2026 02:01 PM)maximus Wrote:  

(02-03-2026 01:41 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(02-03-2026 01:33 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(02-03-2026 01:30 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(02-03-2026 11:55 AM)bullet Wrote:  As shown from this warrant, it really has never been investigated. That is a simple fact.

Since it can't change the result of the election, why do you oppose transparency? Why do you oppose making sure elections are run properly so all legal votes and only legal votes get counted?

Can you link the warrant please, since you seem to be quoting from it? Thanks.

And again, this has nothing to do with transparency.

The warrant exists because a judge found that a crime probably occurred.

Thats all you need to know.

Except when the target is a republican, AMIRITE? Hypocrite.

Also, I don't think we even know the name of this judge.

But trust the government, right...a Republican is in charge.

Youve lost your opinion card on this board as well. Keep talking but no one takes you seriously due to the last 10 years of idiotic, moronic, retarded things you and your comrades have believed and defended.

No valid opinion card for you.

Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

Fat retard never had an opinion to begin with. Just regurgitated leftists talking points.

(02-03-2026 01:41 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(02-03-2026 01:33 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(02-03-2026 01:30 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(02-03-2026 11:55 AM)bullet Wrote:  

(02-03-2026 11:19 AM)ballantyneapp Wrote:  The problem GC is this has been investigated multiple times, Dear Leader didn’t like the findings.

Gabbard is another Russian asset doing the kremlins work.

I have zero trust in any “investigation” carried out by these people, this is to:
1. Satisfy dear leaders hurt butt over losing to Joe Biden
2. Grab more data in order to meddle in elections

As shown from this warrant, it really has never been investigated. That is a simple fact.

Since it can't change the result of the election, why do you oppose transparency? Why do you oppose making sure elections are run properly so all legal votes and only legal votes get counted?

Can you link the warrant please, since you seem to be quoting from it? Thanks.

And again, this has nothing to do with transparency.

The warrant exists because a judge found that a crime probably occurred.

Thats all you need to know.

Except when the target is a republican, AMIRITE? Hypocrite.

Also, I don't think we even know the name of this judge.

But trust the government, right...a Republican is in charge.

"Also, I don't think we even know the name of this judge"

Are you serious, maybe you need to expand your News sources.

Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas

(02-03-2026 03:33 PM)Redbanksdog Wrote:  

(02-03-2026 01:41 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(02-03-2026 01:33 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(02-03-2026 01:30 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(02-03-2026 11:55 AM)bullet Wrote:  As shown from this warrant, it really has never been investigated. That is a simple fact.

Since it can't change the result of the election, why do you oppose transparency? Why do you oppose making sure elections are run properly so all legal votes and only legal votes get counted?

Can you link the warrant please, since you seem to be quoting from it? Thanks.

And again, this has nothing to do with transparency.

The warrant exists because a judge found that a crime probably occurred.

Thats all you need to know.

Except when the target is a republican, AMIRITE? Hypocrite.

Also, I don't think we even know the name of this judge.

But trust the government, right...a Republican is in charge.

"Also, I don't think we even know the name of this judge"

Are you serious, maybe you need to expand your News sources.

Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas

"But... but... ORANGE MAN BAD! REEEEEEE! " - Tom.

"I don't really care, Margaret." Vice President JD Vance; me. (And Andy B. with a slight variation. lol)

(02-03-2026 03:33 PM)Redbanksdog Wrote:  

(02-03-2026 01:41 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(02-03-2026 01:33 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(02-03-2026 01:30 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(02-03-2026 11:55 AM)bullet Wrote:  As shown from this warrant, it really has never been investigated. That is a simple fact.

Since it can't change the result of the election, why do you oppose transparency? Why do you oppose making sure elections are run properly so all legal votes and only legal votes get counted?

Can you link the warrant please, since you seem to be quoting from it? Thanks.

And again, this has nothing to do with transparency.

The warrant exists because a judge found that a crime probably occurred.

Thats all you need to know.

Except when the target is a republican, AMIRITE? Hypocrite.

Also, I don't think we even know the name of this judge.

But trust the government, right...a Republican is in charge.

"Also, I don't think we even know the name of this judge"

Are you serious, maybe you need to expand your News sources.

Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas

Thanks...yes...I clearly did not look in the right place for my query. So no, I was not aware of who it was.

I did find a nice analysis of this whole situation. It's long, but interesting. And yes, it's got a liberal tint, so I'm sure you won't bother trying to learn anything from it.

We Have Questions About the FBI’s Fulton County Search

What the hell is lawfaremedia.org? (Don't answer. I don't care.)

(02-03-2026 04:14 PM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  What the hell is lawfaremedia.org? (Don't answer. I don't care.)

Take a wild guess. I bet you can get it on the first try!

(02-03-2026 04:16 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(02-03-2026 04:14 PM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  What the hell is lawfaremedia.org? (Don't answer. I don't care.)

Take a wild guess. I bet you can get it on the first try!

Drunk Tanqs website...

Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk