(12-11-2025 11:59 AM)shere khan Wrote:  

(12-11-2025 10:57 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(12-11-2025 09:35 AM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(12-11-2025 08:24 AM)TripleA Wrote:  Blah blah blah. Not worth the effort. Leftist.

EDIT: Sen Sheehy of Montana says "Nanny nanny boo boo."

Sheehy says he has seen the evidence, and they are absolutely drug runners.

XACLY! ... poor ol' tanq and those 'fishermen' ... we bite different 'bait' ...

Quite the discerning palate you exhibit. If one person simply says 'X', without any visible support, you believe it straight down the line. If another says 'Y', without any visible support, you dont.

Life in the simple viewpoint.

Not much better than 3A's simple whiny avoidance, but at least you chose to adhere to the 'if someone says it (without objective backing), stink will quaff it down hard and full'. Where 3A walks away muttering whiny stuff. Lolz.

I guess you and 3A dont give a **** about showing objective facts that support a stance. Cool cool. What other speaker / position pairs are you going to sign up for your slavish acceptance of ?

Quiet piggy

Might want to rest that mind with that excess of brains reaction you have seem to grown attached to, Tigger. Im sure that level of conversation gets that ol' Tigger woodie pounding away for an hour or two -- lolz.

(12-11-2025 04:11 PM)andybible1995 Wrote:  

(12-11-2025 04:07 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  

(12-11-2025 01:45 PM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  So the Drunk Patent Lawyer couldn't stay away long enough to lick his wounds and is getting pummeled yet again and the Fat Commie Bastard continues to show his ignorance. You'd think they'd realize they're wrong on this, especially the former, but they just keep taking up for the bad guys.

Oh, well. I guess someone has to. Why not these two bozos?

Luckily for them gargleballs makes them both look semi-intelligent in comparison

These Sunbelt fans are weird. At least Drew and the angry Cajun don't come around here the way they used to.

I haven't seen the Ragin couyon anywhere. And Drew "picks his spots" if you will.

Ofer: There's nothing wrong with asking questions. There is, however, something wrong with deflecting, making strawman arguments, and using cognitive dissonance to do so. You and Tom do that. Don't like being called out for it? Don't do it. (But you're a raging narcissist so I don't expect you to take this as anything but a "low-blow" insult because you see all disagreements with you as a personal insult. That's just how you are.)

(12-11-2025 04:24 PM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  

(12-11-2025 04:11 PM)andybible1995 Wrote:  

(12-11-2025 04:07 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  

(12-11-2025 01:45 PM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  So the Drunk Patent Lawyer couldn't stay away long enough to lick his wounds and is getting pummeled yet again and the Fat Commie Bastard continues to show his ignorance. You'd think they'd realize they're wrong on this, especially the former, but they just keep taking up for the bad guys.

Oh, well. I guess someone has to. Why not these two bozos?

Luckily for them gargleballs makes them both look semi-intelligent in comparison

These Sunbelt fans are weird. At least Drew and the angry Cajun don't come around here the way they used to.

I haven't seen the Ragin couyon anywhere. And Drew "picks his spots" if you will.

Ofer: There's nothing wrong with asking questions. There is, however, something wrong with deflecting, making strawman arguments, and using cognitive dissonance to do so. You and Tom do that. Don't like being called out for it? Don't do it. (But you're a raging narcissist so I don't expect you to take this as anything but a "low-blow" insult because you see all disagreements with you as a personal insult. That's just how you are.)

I remember Drew came by here and threw a pot shot at us with a 'thoughts and prayers' post the day CK was murdered. Luckily he got neg repped for it, as he should have.

As for the angry Cajun, he's scurried back over to the Sunbelt board.

Tanq, you absolutely suck at trash talk. Like a slow middle schooler.

Quote:1989. Joe Biden delivers a televised message from the Democrat party, calling on then President Bush to do more to stop the flow of drugs into the country.

In addition to calling for more prisons and more cops, Biden said that Democrats want the creation of a strike force to attack drug dealers before they reach our borders.

"Let's go after the drug lords where they live with an international strike force. There must be no safe haven for these narco-terrorists and they must know it."

Times have changed a little.

(12-11-2025 06:41 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Tanq, you absolutely suck at trash talk. Like a slow middle schooler.

Cool, cool -- champ. Glad to know that 'trash talk' is a metric that is seemingly high enough as a 'thing' on your 'needs to have' list to have to make a comment about. Kind of explains you in a nutshell, I guess.

(12-11-2025 04:24 PM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  

(12-11-2025 04:11 PM)andybible1995 Wrote:  

(12-11-2025 04:07 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  

(12-11-2025 01:45 PM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  So the Drunk Patent Lawyer couldn't stay away long enough to lick his wounds and is getting pummeled yet again and the Fat Commie Bastard continues to show his ignorance. You'd think they'd realize they're wrong on this, especially the former, but they just keep taking up for the bad guys.

Oh, well. I guess someone has to. Why not these two bozos?

Luckily for them gargleballs makes them both look semi-intelligent in comparison

These Sunbelt fans are weird. At least Drew and the angry Cajun don't come around here the way they used to.

I haven't seen the Ragin couyon anywhere. And Drew "picks his spots" if you will.

Ofer: There's nothing wrong with asking questions. There is, however, something wrong with deflecting, making strawman arguments, and using cognitive dissonance to do so. You and Tom do that. Don't like being called out for it? Don't do it. (But you're a raging narcissist so I don't expect you to take this as anything but a "low-blow" insult because you see all disagreements with you as a personal insult. That's just how you are.)

Wow, your whiny **** reaches new highs there, lil boy. Good job. Feel better now? I guess not given the amount of rage induced **** talk that seems to be your *only* mode of communication. Cool cool.

(12-12-2025 06:09 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(12-11-2025 06:41 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Tanq, you absolutely suck at trash talk. Like a slow middle schooler.

Cool, cool -- champ. Glad to know that 'trash talk' is a metric that is seemingly high enough as a 'thing' on your 'needs to have' list to have to make a comment about. Kind of explains you in a nutshell, I guess.

Not to mention that it's basically a confession that you ARE good at it. Oops.

(12-11-2025 04:32 PM)andybible1995 Wrote:  

(12-11-2025 04:24 PM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  

(12-11-2025 04:11 PM)andybible1995 Wrote:  

(12-11-2025 04:07 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  

(12-11-2025 01:45 PM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  So the Drunk Patent Lawyer couldn't stay away long enough to lick his wounds and is getting pummeled yet again and the Fat Commie Bastard continues to show his ignorance. You'd think they'd realize they're wrong on this, especially the former, but they just keep taking up for the bad guys.

Oh, well. I guess someone has to. Why not these two bozos?

Luckily for them gargleballs makes them both look semi-intelligent in comparison

These Sunbelt fans are weird. At least Drew and the angry Cajun don't come around here the way they used to.

I haven't seen the Ragin couyon anywhere. And Drew "picks his spots" if you will.

Ofer: There's nothing wrong with asking questions. There is, however, something wrong with deflecting, making strawman arguments, and using cognitive dissonance to do so. You and Tom do that. Don't like being called out for it? Don't do it. (But you're a raging narcissist so I don't expect you to take this as anything but a "low-blow" insult because you see all disagreements with you as a personal insult. That's just how you are.)

I remember Drew came by here and threw a pot shot at us with a 'thoughts and prayers' post the day CK was murdered. Luckily he got neg repped for it, as he should have.

As for the angry Cajun, he's scurried back over to the Sunbelt board.

Who is this Drew person? Gamenole?

(12-12-2025 06:09 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(12-11-2025 06:41 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Tanq, you absolutely suck at trash talk. Like a slow middle schooler.

Cool, cool -- champ. Glad to know that 'trash talk' is a metric that is seemingly high enough as a 'thing' on your 'needs to have' list to have to make a comment about. Kind of explains you in a nutshell, I guess.

Not for nothing, but you are responsible for a lot of the trash talking here, not all but enough. And it's juvenile-level smack. My 14 year old granddaughter would smack talk both of our asses into the ground. So the obvious question is, why must you do it?

There are times when you go on the defensive, and I agree there are times you're justified in doing so, but c'mon, man, with every single post? You can do much better. I know because I've seen it.

I'm trying to stop being so accusatory and angry towards people with whom I disagree. I believe I've demonstrated in our own back-and-forths that I'm trying to be non-inflammatory, at least now, unlike I used to be.

With all due respect and without being a smartass, perhaps you could try it.

And andybible, with all due respect, I'll respond and collaborate with whom and however I please. I don't need you explaining to me how this place works. You've probably noticed how long I've been here and the number of posts I've made (ridiculous now that I think about it), which should be an indication that I'm not new to this game we play over here. If you would rather not see my responses to someone you have on ignore, then you have two options: keep scrolling or put me on ignore. I'm just stating my position in response to something you said that was directed my way.

I hope you'll choose to relax over the issue you brought up and continue engaging with the rest of us. I enjoy much of your input, and it would be missed.

(12-12-2025 06:31 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(12-12-2025 06:09 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(12-11-2025 06:41 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Tanq, you absolutely suck at trash talk. Like a slow middle schooler.

Cool, cool -- champ. Glad to know that 'trash talk' is a metric that is seemingly high enough as a 'thing' on your 'needs to have' list to have to make a comment about. Kind of explains you in a nutshell, I guess.

Not for nothing, but you are responsible for a lot of the trash talking here, not all but enough. And it's juvenile-level smack. My 14 year old granddaughter would smack talk both of our asses into the ground. So the obvious question is, why must you do it?

There are times when you go on the defensive, and I agree there are times you're justified in doing so, but c'mon, man, with every single post? You can do much better. I know because I've seen it.

I'm trying to stop being so accusatory and angry towards people with whom I disagree. I believe I've demonstrated in our own back-and-forths that I'm trying to be non-inflammatory, at least now, unlike I used to be.

With all due respect and without being a smartass, perhaps you could try it.

Not even close.

He gets attacked solely for being a conservative that doesn't swallow every trump act hook, line, and sinker.

Yes he's brash, but he's like me. Doesn't have time for those here who refuse to try and learn or source anything...so he will be short with them.

(12-12-2025 06:40 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  And andybible, with all due respect, I'll respond and collaborate with whom and however I please. I don't need you explaining to me how this place works. You've probably noticed how long I've been here and the number of posts I've made (ridiculous now that I think about it), which should be an indication that I'm not new to this game we play over here. If you would rather not see my responses to someone you have on ignore, then you have two options: keep scrolling or put me on ignore. I'm just stating my position in response to something you said that was directed my way.

I hope you'll choose to relax over the issue you brought up and continue engaging with the rest of us. I enjoy much of your input, and it would be missed.

TB4E,

I find that putting a resident leftist on ignore is childish, immature, and not helpful to the situation.

My new approach to them is this:

Do not respond to them at all.

That's it. It's that simple.

No matter what people like you or I say, the leftists on here will take it out of context, and twist it to fit their agenda. That and they are desperate for attention.

I've decided that it's better to not respond to them directly at all than to put them on ignore.

(12-12-2025 06:22 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(12-11-2025 04:32 PM)andybible1995 Wrote:  

(12-11-2025 04:24 PM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  

(12-11-2025 04:11 PM)andybible1995 Wrote:  

(12-11-2025 04:07 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  Luckily for them gargleballs makes them both look semi-intelligent in comparison

These Sunbelt fans are weird. At least Drew and the angry Cajun don't come around here the way they used to.

I haven't seen the Ragin couyon anywhere. And Drew "picks his spots" if you will.

Ofer: There's nothing wrong with asking questions. There is, however, something wrong with deflecting, making strawman arguments, and using cognitive dissonance to do so. You and Tom do that. Don't like being called out for it? Don't do it. (But you're a raging narcissist so I don't expect you to take this as anything but a "low-blow" insult because you see all disagreements with you as a personal insult. That's just how you are.)

I remember Drew came by here and threw a pot shot at us with a 'thoughts and prayers' post the day CK was murdered. Luckily he got neg repped for it, as he should have.

As for the angry Cajun, he's scurried back over to the Sunbelt board.

Who is this Drew person? Gamenole?

Drew is a Sunbelt poster like balls is. He roots for Georgia Southern.

(12-12-2025 06:31 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(12-12-2025 06:09 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(12-11-2025 06:41 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Tanq, you absolutely suck at trash talk. Like a slow middle schooler.

Cool, cool -- champ. Glad to know that 'trash talk' is a metric that is seemingly high enough as a 'thing' on your 'needs to have' list to have to make a comment about. Kind of explains you in a nutshell, I guess.

Not for nothing, but you are responsible for a lot of the trash talking here, not all but enough. And it's juvenile-level smack. My 14 year old granddaughter would smack talk both of our asses into the ground. So the obvious question is, why must you do it?

There are times when you go on the defensive, and I agree there are times you're justified in doing so, but c'mon, man, with every single post? You can do much better. I know because I've seen it.

I'm trying to stop being so accusatory and angry towards people with whom I disagree. I believe I've demonstrated in our own back-and-forths that I'm trying to be non-inflammatory, at least now, unlike I used to be.

With all due respect and without being a smartass, perhaps you could try it.

I suggest you look at the initiation of **** talking in pretty much *every* *SINGLE* instance, good sir.

When you do, you will pretty much find it is not me that starts the ****.

If responding to smack with smack is 'being responsible' -- then your bolded is on point. I dont denote my response as being responsible as you seem to view it.

And TB, I have followed your 'non smack' to me with an equivalent 'non smack' to you.

And to your last sentence, I do try it. Until the **** talking starts up with me. Then I dont. Its really that simple.

I suggest that perhaps for once you lecture your compadres in the above manner, instead of me.

(12-12-2025 09:59 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(12-12-2025 06:31 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(12-12-2025 06:09 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(12-11-2025 06:41 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Tanq, you absolutely suck at trash talk. Like a slow middle schooler.

Cool, cool -- champ. Glad to know that 'trash talk' is a metric that is seemingly high enough as a 'thing' on your 'needs to have' list to have to make a comment about. Kind of explains you in a nutshell, I guess.

Not for nothing, but you are responsible for a lot of the trash talking here, not all but enough. And it's juvenile-level smack. My 14 year old granddaughter would smack talk both of our asses into the ground. So the obvious question is, why must you do it?

There are times when you go on the defensive, and I agree there are times you're justified in doing so, but c'mon, man, with every single post? You can do much better. I know because I've seen it.

I'm trying to stop being so accusatory and angry towards people with whom I disagree. I believe I've demonstrated in our own back-and-forths that I'm trying to be non-inflammatory, at least now, unlike I used to be.

With all due respect and without being a smartass, perhaps you could try it.

I suggest you look at the initiation of **** talking in pretty much *every* *SINGLE* instance, good sir.

When you do, you will pretty much find it is not me that starts the ****.

If responding to smack with smack is 'being responsible' -- then your bolded is on point. I dont denote my response as being responsible as you seem to view it.

And TB, I have followed your 'non smack' to me with an equivalent 'non smack' to you.

And to your last sentence, I do try it. Until the **** talking starts up with me. Then I dont. Its really that simple.

I suggest that perhaps for once you lecture your compadres in the above manner, instead of me.

I must interject and agree counselor ... you simply suck at the smack ...

Hell, he sucks at sucking.

(12-12-2025 11:18 AM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(12-12-2025 09:59 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(12-12-2025 06:31 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(12-12-2025 06:09 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(12-11-2025 06:41 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Tanq, you absolutely suck at trash talk. Like a slow middle schooler.

Cool, cool -- champ. Glad to know that 'trash talk' is a metric that is seemingly high enough as a 'thing' on your 'needs to have' list to have to make a comment about. Kind of explains you in a nutshell, I guess.

Not for nothing, but you are responsible for a lot of the trash talking here, not all but enough. And it's juvenile-level smack. My 14 year old granddaughter would smack talk both of our asses into the ground. So the obvious question is, why must you do it?

There are times when you go on the defensive, and I agree there are times you're justified in doing so, but c'mon, man, with every single post? You can do much better. I know because I've seen it.

I'm trying to stop being so accusatory and angry towards people with whom I disagree. I believe I've demonstrated in our own back-and-forths that I'm trying to be non-inflammatory, at least now, unlike I used to be.

With all due respect and without being a smartass, perhaps you could try it.

I suggest you look at the initiation of **** talking in pretty much *every* *SINGLE* instance, good sir.

When you do, you will pretty much find it is not me that starts the ****.

If responding to smack with smack is 'being responsible' -- then your bolded is on point. I dont denote my response as being responsible as you seem to view it.

And TB, I have followed your 'non smack' to me with an equivalent 'non smack' to you.

And to your last sentence, I do try it. Until the **** talking starts up with me. Then I dont. Its really that simple.

I suggest that perhaps for once you lecture your compadres in the above manner, instead of me.

I must interject and agree counselor ... you simply suck at the smack ...

At least it isnt a knee jerk automatic reaction to a different point of view. Funny that.

(12-12-2025 09:04 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(12-12-2025 06:31 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(12-12-2025 06:09 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(12-11-2025 06:41 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Tanq, you absolutely suck at trash talk. Like a slow middle schooler.

Cool, cool -- champ. Glad to know that 'trash talk' is a metric that is seemingly high enough as a 'thing' on your 'needs to have' list to have to make a comment about. Kind of explains you in a nutshell, I guess.

Not for nothing, but you are responsible for a lot of the trash talking here, not all but enough. And it's juvenile-level smack. My 14 year old granddaughter would smack talk both of our asses into the ground. So the obvious question is, why must you do it?

There are times when you go on the defensive, and I agree there are times you're justified in doing so, but c'mon, man, with every single post? You can do much better. I know because I've seen it.

I'm trying to stop being so accusatory and angry towards people with whom I disagree. I believe I've demonstrated in our own back-and-forths that I'm trying to be non-inflammatory, at least now, unlike I used to be.

With all due respect and without being a smartass, perhaps you could try it.

Not even close.

He gets attacked solely for being a conservative that doesn't swallow every trump act hook, line, and sinker.

Yes he's brash, but he's like me. Doesn't have time for those here who refuse to try and learn or source anything...so he will be short with them.

Yeah yeah, he's nothing like you so stop humping his leg.

(12-12-2025 09:07 AM)andybible1995 Wrote:  

(12-12-2025 06:40 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  And andybible, with all due respect, I'll respond and collaborate with whom and however I please. I don't need you explaining to me how this place works. You've probably noticed how long I've been here and the number of posts I've made (ridiculous now that I think about it), which should be an indication that I'm not new to this game we play over here. If you would rather not see my responses to someone you have on ignore, then you have two options: keep scrolling or put me on ignore. I'm just stating my position in response to something you said that was directed my way.

I hope you'll choose to relax over the issue you brought up and continue engaging with the rest of us. I enjoy much of your input, and it would be missed.

TB4E,

I find that putting a resident leftist on ignore is childish, immature, and not helpful to the situation.

My new approach to them is this:

Do not respond to them at all.

That's it. It's that simple.

No matter what people like you or I say, the leftists on here will take it out of context, and twist it to fit their agenda. That and they are desperate for attention.

I've decided that it's better to not respond to them directly at all than to put them on ignore.