(11-13-2025 11:21 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  10 replies to a rephrase. Neat circle jerk you clowns have going.

Most of them personal comments. About par for the bottom feeders one expects around here. Lolz.

Don't you ever get tired of coming here and being embarrassed b/c you're wrong so much?

(11-13-2025 11:20 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(11-13-2025 06:37 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(11-13-2025 06:19 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(11-13-2025 06:07 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Per an article yesterday which I posted a link to somewhere here, Jack Smith's investigation included over 400 people, all Republicans.

It wasn't about getting Trump. It was about bringing down the entire Republican Party.

I guess you folks think that the people Trump interacted with to short circuit the counting by congress on J6 or tried to promote invalid electors as proper would be Democrats.

Interesting take.

Lolz.

Au contraire mon frère ... we're still laughing at your take on it being an insurrection...

Please note where I said insurrection. My words are precise. But please feel free to change them willy nilly to whatever formulation *you* decide to rephrase them to. Sad stuff there. Your quick knee jerk rephrase needs a knee jerk specialist Im afraid.

fk that bs ... by default, claiming DJT was trying to illegally subjugate the election before it even happened puts you in the same category as the rest...

"insurrection" is nothing more than a placeholder ... you know XACLY! wtf I'm talking about ... I'm sick of your bs...

you can go screw yourself once more, Winston...

(11-13-2025 06:19 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(11-13-2025 06:07 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Per an article yesterday which I posted a link to somewhere here, Jack Smith's investigation included over 400 people, all Republicans.

It wasn't about getting Trump. It was about bringing down the entire Republican Party.

I guess you folks think that the people Trump interacted with to short circuit the counting by congress on J6 or tried to promote invalid electors as proper would be Democrats.

Interesting take.

Lolz.

Who is “you folks”?

You’re the third post, lolz

(11-14-2025 12:20 AM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(11-13-2025 11:20 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(11-13-2025 06:37 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(11-13-2025 06:19 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(11-13-2025 06:07 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Per an article yesterday which I posted a link to somewhere here, Jack Smith's investigation included over 400 people, all Republicans.

It wasn't about getting Trump. It was about bringing down the entire Republican Party.

I guess you folks think that the people Trump interacted with to short circuit the counting by congress on J6 or tried to promote invalid electors as proper would be Democrats.

Interesting take.

Lolz.

Au contraire mon frère ... we're still laughing at your take on it being an insurrection...

Please note where I said insurrection. My words are precise. But please feel free to change them willy nilly to whatever formulation *you* decide to rephrase them to. Sad stuff there. Your quick knee jerk rephrase needs a knee jerk specialist Im afraid.

fk that bs ... by default, claiming DJT was trying to illegally subjugate the election before it even happened puts you in the same category as the rest...

"insurrection" is nothing more than a placeholder ... you know XACLY! wtf I'm talking about ... I'm sick of your bs...

you can go screw yourself once more, Winston...

His song and Tap dance is getting old.

"Getting" old? Hell, it's been old forever. I can't believe he still thinks he's cool hanging out here. What a loser. The most self unaware person on the internet.

(11-14-2025 12:20 AM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(11-13-2025 11:20 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(11-13-2025 06:37 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(11-13-2025 06:19 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(11-13-2025 06:07 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Per an article yesterday which I posted a link to somewhere here, Jack Smith's investigation included over 400 people, all Republicans.

It wasn't about getting Trump. It was about bringing down the entire Republican Party.

I guess you folks think that the people Trump interacted with to short circuit the counting by congress on J6 or tried to promote invalid electors as proper would be Democrats.

Interesting take.

Lolz.

Au contraire mon frère ... we're still laughing at your take on it being an insurrection...

Please note where I said insurrection. My words are precise. But please feel free to change them willy nilly to whatever formulation *you* decide to rephrase them to. Sad stuff there. Your quick knee jerk rephrase needs a knee jerk specialist Im afraid.

fk that bs ... by default, claiming DJT was trying to illegally subjugate the election before it even happened puts you in the same category as the rest...

"insurrection" is nothing more than a placeholder ... you know XACLY! wtf I'm talking about ... I'm sick of your bs...

you can go screw yourself once more, Winston...

Maybe *you* should actually read the record on the subject. It’s actually the plan Trump sought. Testified to in multiple places by the participants. Open court under allocution, other places under deposition.

Sorry that gets you maddy poo and anxious as you show above.

To the point of Beavis level name calling. Cool cool.

(11-13-2025 11:36 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(11-13-2025 11:21 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  10 replies to a rephrase. Neat circle jerk you clowns have going.

Most of them personal comments. About par for the bottom feeders one expects around here. Lolz.

Don't you ever get tired of coming here and being embarrassed b/c you're wrong so much?

You being the ultimate whiny ***** in response to actual and actual issues is a great side treat. Kind of a neat counterpoint to your lazy ass ‘throw **** against the wall’ and refusal to back anything posting mode.

Cool combo, champ.

(11-13-2025 11:22 PM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  

(11-13-2025 09:46 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(11-13-2025 06:37 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(11-13-2025 06:19 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(11-13-2025 06:07 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Per an article yesterday which I posted a link to somewhere here, Jack Smith's investigation included over 400 people, all Republicans.

It wasn't about getting Trump. It was about bringing down the entire Republican Party.

I guess you folks think that the people Trump interacted with to short circuit the counting by congress on J6 or tried to promote invalid electors as proper would be Democrats.

Interesting take.

Lolz.

Au contraire mon frère ... we're still laughing at you...

Hey Stink, FIFY. You could have stopped with the above.

Yep. And we're still laughing at the Drunk Patent Lawyer. Cool. Cool cool cool. (Thanks, Community!)

Substantive comment - 0 (can’t give a negative to the **** you toss out above)

Whiny retard level defensive butthurt name calling — 9.5.

Good job chuckles.

It’s really wild what one or two posts will do to the mob here….. lolz.

The board idiot calling everybody else idiots. Rich.

That's your problem, hoss. You think you are smarter than everybody else. No, you're not.

(11-14-2025 09:11 AM)TripleA Wrote:  The board idiot calling everybody else idiots. Rich.

That's your problem, hoss. You think you are smarter than everybody else. No, you're not.

Cool cool, sparkles. Might want to try a new schtick. Or being the ‘smart’ guy you claim, just continue with your whiny crap. Lolz.

tanq: "I'm a big smart lawyer who pwns people on the internet. Durrr!"

This is also tanq:

Call me whe you graduate. From ‘12 year old bratty child whiny perjorative”. Or from ‘whiny child meme’ as a general course of action.

Sound like a plan there, punkin?

(11-14-2025 04:40 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  Call me whe you graduate. From ‘12 year old bratty child whiny perjorative”. Or from ‘whiny child meme’ as a general course of action.

Sound like a plan there, punkin?

We Todd

Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

I have a better idea, Drunk Patent Lawyer. How about you call us when you admit you were wrong about your "expert analysis" when it comes to legal issues?

Of course, that's asking too much so I won't hold my breath. Instead, I'll keep making fun of you. Because you suck. (It ain't my fault you suck; you just do.)

(11-14-2025 07:35 PM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  I have a better idea, Drunk Patent Lawyer. How about you call us when you admit you were wrong about your "expert analysis" when it comes to legal issues?

Of course, that's asking too much so I won't hold my breath. Instead, I'll keep making fun of you. Because you suck. (It ain't my fault you suck; you just do.)

So says the twerp that seemingly has to revert to explicit lies in his crybaby campaign of nothing but **** talk. Cool cool.

Keep crying and thrashing those arms and legs, punkin. Lolz.

Still can't admit you're wrong about anything, huh? Good for you. Really, it must be incredible to have your deeply inflated ego, Drunk Patent Lawyer.

Also, I ain't the one crying, buddy boy. It's hilarious to see everything you said would happen to Trump come crumbling down. And instead of saying, "whoops, I was wrong," you choose to insist that you are right when it's been proven otherwise time and time and time again. Yet I'm the one crying. Riiiiiiiiiiiight, and dihydrogen monoxide is the worst thing in the entire universe! (...And it's not.)

I'm done entertaining your sorry ass. Away with you!

(11-15-2025 09:53 AM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  Still can't admit you're wrong about anything, huh? Good for you. Really, it must be incredible to have your deeply inflated ego, Drunk Patent Lawyer.

Also, I ain't the one crying, buddy boy. It's hilarious to see everything you said would happen to Trump come crumbling down. And instead of saying, "whoops, I was wrong," you choose to insist that you are right when it's been proven otherwise time and time and time again. Yet I'm the one crying. Riiiiiiiiiiiight, and dihydrogen monoxide is the worst thing in the entire universe! (...And it's not.)

I'm done entertaining your sorry ass. Away with you!

Maybe you should dig up my exact words on that sparkles. As a supposed news media guy, I thought you might understand the difference between actual quoted words and what some **** ass twerp thinks he heard. Just saying, son.

Or just do your now normal **** and simply make up something.

Lolz.

And someone is still delusional, I see. Oh, well. I'm sure Fantasyland is still missing its mayor. Bye, Drunk Patent Lawyer.

(11-14-2025 12:20 AM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(11-13-2025 11:20 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(11-13-2025 06:37 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(11-13-2025 06:19 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(11-13-2025 06:07 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Per an article yesterday which I posted a link to somewhere here, Jack Smith's investigation included over 400 people, all Republicans.

It wasn't about getting Trump. It was about bringing down the entire Republican Party.

I guess you folks think that the people Trump interacted with to short circuit the counting by congress on J6 or tried to promote invalid electors as proper would be Democrats.

Interesting take.

Lolz.

Au contraire mon frère ... we're still laughing at your take on it being an insurrection...

Please note where I said insurrection. My words are precise. But please feel free to change them willy nilly to whatever formulation *you* decide to rephrase them to. Sad stuff there. Your quick knee jerk rephrase needs a knee jerk specialist Im afraid.

fk that bs ... by default, claiming DJT was trying to illegally subjugate the election before it even happened puts you in the same category as the rest...

"insurrection" is nothing more than a placeholder ... you know XACLY! wtf I'm talking about ... I'm sick of your bs...

you can go screw yourself once more, Winston...

Damn! And Stink used to like this guy. Shows Ofer’s exceptional ability to make friends.