Frick Kimmel

There. I simplified it.

Where was the lefts concern for constitutional rights back during the Covid years? Remember the lectures about media platforms not being the government back when they were censoring any opinion that didn't match the government's position?
Funny to watch them cry when they have a taste of what they have been spooning out for so long.

(09-22-2025 06:56 AM)TripleA Wrote:  What is it with peeps on here trying to tell other peeps how to post?

Just because someone disagrees with you doesn’t mean they’re telling you how to post.

(09-22-2025 07:48 AM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  

(09-22-2025 06:56 AM)TripleA Wrote:  What is it with peeps on here trying to tell other peeps how to post?

Just because someone disagrees with you doesn’t mean they’re telling you how to post.

Yall all need to poster better, more like me

Lol!

(09-22-2025 07:48 AM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  

(09-22-2025 06:56 AM)TripleA Wrote:  What is it with peeps on here trying to tell other peeps how to post?

Just because someone disagrees with you doesn’t mean they’re telling you how to post.

Good grief, if that were the criteria, it would be the majority of posts on this board.

No, I'm talking about comments like this:

Quote:...but you all can't see past the tree in front of you.

And you do it telling us not to reply to or quote Tom. That's not an opinion, that's an instruction, lol.

(09-22-2025 07:59 AM)shere khan Wrote:  

(09-22-2025 07:48 AM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  

(09-22-2025 06:56 AM)TripleA Wrote:  What is it with peeps on here trying to tell other peeps how to post?

Just because someone disagrees with you doesn’t mean they’re telling you how to post.

Yall all need to poster better, more like me

If we tried to be like you, we would both be blabbering idiots before the day was over.

I never said don’t reply to Tom. I was simply pointing out that, IMHO, it’s fruitless to reply to Tom. I don’t tell people what to do or how to think. Apparently I’m being told now how I can post.

(09-22-2025 08:07 AM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  I never said don’t reply to Tom. I was simply pointing out that, IMHO, it’s fruitless to reply to Tom. I don’t tell people what to do or how to think. Apparently I’m being told now how I can post.

Not by me. I'm just saying how it feels to me. Your opinion that it's fruitless. Others disagree.

Ok, not an instruction, lol.

(09-22-2025 08:07 AM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  I never said don’t reply to Tom. I was simply pointing out that, IMHO, it’s fruitless to reply to Tom. I don’t tell people what to do or how to think. Apparently I’m being told now how I can post.

Here I'll tell you how to post.. With reckless abandonment...

Sorry if I missed it but I cannot read through this entire 20+ pages....


Trump did not fire or have Kimmel fired... Why is that narrative not being called out for the blatant lie that it is?

Two large affiliate carriers pulled out of broadcasting the show... regardless of whether they were losing money or not leading up to that, they put the pressure on ABC, not Trump.

(09-22-2025 07:16 AM)Tiger1983 Wrote:  The Dem's suppressed free speech with abandon for the flimsiest of reasons (e.g., mean tweets). They are in no position to cry with outrage now.

Nevertheless, it is important to remember a retraction of Kimmel's lie would have very likely quelled the issue. It was the ABC's decision to axe Kimmel using his lie as cover for terrible ratings.

I oppose FTC interference on the matter, assuming it occurred.

That is what gets me the most. They openly cheered on the complete deplatforming of several people and wanted even more of it. That is 1000% times more of an attack on free speech that losing a late night talk show with putrid ratings.

Kimmel can still go 100 different place on social media or TV and exercise his free speech at will.

Cat was back yesterday. Must have gotten back from his All-inclusive vacation. (Since this thread has been diverted).

(09-22-2025 08:36 AM)Eldonabe Wrote:  Sorry if I missed it but I cannot read through this entire 20+ pages....


Trump did not fire or have Kimmel fired... Why is that narrative not being called out for the blatant lie that it is?

Two large affiliate carriers pulled out of broadcasting the show... regardless of whether they were losing money or not leading up to that, they put the pressure on ABC, not Trump.

It's a lefty talking point..

This weekend I saw that:

Trump had Kimmel fired
Disney had lost $4 Billion in the days since the suspension
Tons of libs saying they were ending their ESPN/Disney/Hulu subscription
One cheeky fellow saying he got a subscription just to cancel it

But cutting through the BS:

Trump didn't have Jimble Kimble fired.. Kimmel done it to himself and he's not even fired he's suspended

There is no way to quantify if there was a loss or not for a few weeks.

Do I think they lost subscribers, sure.. Do I think there's idiots that signed up for a subscription then canceled, yea but the thing is they paid for a month up front and can't get the money back.

(09-22-2025 09:12 AM)Eagleaidaholic Wrote:  Cat was back yesterday. Must have gotten back from his All-inclusive vacation. (Since this thread has been diverted).

Sure he just didn't go get laid for a few days

(09-22-2025 08:11 AM)gdunn Wrote:  

(09-22-2025 08:07 AM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  I never said don’t reply to Tom. I was simply pointing out that, IMHO, it’s fruitless to reply to Tom. I don’t tell people what to do or how to think. Apparently I’m being told now how I can post.

Here I'll tell you how to post.. With reckless abandonment...

Finally. Thank you.

(09-22-2025 09:21 AM)gdunn Wrote:  

(09-22-2025 08:36 AM)Eldonabe Wrote:  Sorry if I missed it but I cannot read through this entire 20+ pages....


Trump did not fire or have Kimmel fired... Why is that narrative not being called out for the blatant lie that it is?

Two large affiliate carriers pulled out of broadcasting the show... regardless of whether they were losing money or not leading up to that, they put the pressure on ABC, not Trump.

It's a lefty talking point..

This weekend I saw that:

Trump had Kimmel fired
Disney had lost $4 Billion in the days since the suspension
Tons of libs saying they were ending their ESPN/Disney/Hulu subscription
One cheeky fellow saying he got a subscription just to cancel it

But cutting through the BS:

Trump didn't have Jimble Kimble fired.. Kimmel done it to himself and he's not even fired he's suspended

There is no way to quantify if there was a loss or not for a few weeks.

Do I think they lost subscribers, sure.. Do I think there's idiots that signed up for a subscription then canceled, yea but the thing is they paid for a month up front and can't get the money back.

Sounds like Reddit. I imagine it's all the same as the "mass Netflix exit" promoted on Reddit when Netflix cracked down on password sharing. Netflix actually gained subscribers, not lost subscribers.

(09-22-2025 09:22 AM)gdunn Wrote:  

(09-22-2025 09:12 AM)Eagleaidaholic Wrote:  Cat was back yesterday. Must have gotten back from his All-inclusive vacation. (Since this thread has been diverted).

Sure he just didn't go get laid for a few days

Don't tomcats try to do that ALL the time?

(09-19-2025 02:21 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Tom, you are obfuscating again. You clearly said that guy didn't know one thing about you. That apparently is untue [sic]. He def knows that you are not married, or that you're a liar.

Talk about obfuscating!